CHECKER1.C
/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHECKER1.C -- Mouse Hit-Test Demo Program No. 1
(c) Charles Petzold, 1998
--------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
#include <windows.h>
#define DIVISIONS 5
LRESULT CALLBACK WndProc (HWND, UINT, WPARAM, LPARAM) ;
int WINAPI WinMain (HINSTANCE hInstance, HINSTANCE hPrevInstance,PSTR szCmdLine, int iCmdShow)
{ static TCHAR szAppName[] = TEXT ("Checker1") ;
HWND hwnd ;
MSG msg ;
WNDCLASS wndclass ;
wndclass.style = CS_HREDRAW | CS_VREDRAW ;
wndclass.lpfnWndProc = WndProc ;
wndclass.cbClsExtra = 0 ;
wndclass.cbWndExtra = 0 ;
wndclass.hInstance = hInstance ;
wndclass.hIcon = LoadIcon (NULL, IDI_APPLICATION) ;
wndclass.hCursor = LoadCursor (NULL, IDC_ARROW) ;
wndclass.hbrBackground = (HBRUSH) GetStockObject (WHITE_BRUSH) ;
wndclass.lpszMenuName = NULL ;
wndclass.lpszClassName = szAppName ;
if (!RegisterClass (&wndclass))
{
MessageBox ( NULL, TEXT ("Program requires Windows NT!"),
szAppName, MB_ICONERROR) ;
return 0 ;
}
hwnd = CreateWindow (szAppName, TEXT ("Checker1 Mouse Hit-Test Demo"),
WS_OVERLAPPEDWINDOW,
CW_USEDEFAULT, CW_USEDEFAULT,
CW_USEDEFAULT, CW_USEDEFAULT,
NULL, NULL, hInstance, NULL) ;
ShowWindow (hwnd, iCmdShow) ;
UpdateWindow (hwnd) ;
while (GetMessage (&msg, NULL, 0, 0))
{
TranslateMessage (&msg) ;
DispatchMessage (&msg) ;
}
return msg.wParam ;
}
LRESULT CALLBACK WndProc (HWND hwnd, UINT message, WPARAM wParam,LPARAMlParam)
{
static BOOL fState[DIVISIONS][DIVISIONS] ;
static int cxBlock, cyBlock ;
HDC hdc ;
int x, y ;
PAINTSTRUCT ps ;
RECT rect ;
switch (message)
{
case WM_SIZE :
cxBlock = LOWORD (lParam) / DIVISIONS ;
cyBlock = HIWORD (lParam) / DIVISIONS ;
return 0 ;
case WM_LBUTTONDOWN :
x = LOWORD (lParam) / cxBlock ;
y = HIWORD (lParam) / cyBlock ;
if (x < DIVISIONS && y < DIVISIONS)
{
fState [x][y] ^= 1 ; //异或指令,这是“X”能够点一下显示,再点一下消失的原因。
rect.left = x * cxBlock ;
rect.top = y * cyBlock ;
rect.right = (x + 1) * cxBlock ;
rect.bottom = (y + 1) * cyBlock ;
InvalidateRect (hwnd, &rect, FALSE) ;//该函数第三个参数针对的是“background ”即
//背景,其使用方法还进一步实践。
}
else
MessageBeep (0) ;
return 0 ;
case WM_PAINT :
hdc = BeginPaint (hwnd, &ps) ;
for (x = 0 ; x < DIVISIONS ; x++)
for (y = 0 ; y < DIVISIONS ; y++)
{
Rectangle (hdc, x * cxBlock, y * cyBlock,
(x + 1) * cxBlock, (y + 1) * cyBlock) ;
if (fState [x][y])
{
MoveToEx (hdc, x * cxBlock, y * cyBlock, NULL) ;
LineTo(hdc, (x+1) * cxBlock, (y+1) * cyBlock) ;
MoveToEx (hdc, x * cxBlock, (y+1) * cyBlock, NULL) ;
LineTo (hdc, (x+1) * cxBlock, y * cyBlock) ;
}
}
EndPaint (hwnd,&ps);
return 0 ;
case WM_DESTROY :
PostQuitMessage (0) ;
return 0 ;
}
return DefWindowProc (hwnd, message, wParam, lParam) ;
}
/------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
在处理WM_PAINT期间,CHECKER1在重新绘制之前并不检查每个矩形区域的有效性,尽管它可以这样做。检查有效性的一种方法是在循环中为每个矩形块建立RECT结构(使用与WM_LBUTTONDOWN处理程序中相同的公式),并使用IntersectRect函数检查它是否与无效矩形(ps.rcPaint)相交。
/-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
该程序的paint部分重绘所有的小矩形,这不是必要的,因为只有一个小矩形无效而引发paint消息,也就是说,只要更新这个无效的小矩形就行了,我想原程序为了简便起见,更新了整个客户区。如果要检查每个矩形区域的有效性,paint部分可改为:
(先定义一个用来充放目标矩形的: RECT DesRect;)
case WM_PAINT :
hdc = BeginPaint (hwnd, &ps) ;
for (x = 0 ; x < DIVISIONS ; x++)
for (y = 0 ; y < DIVISIONS ; y++)
{
rect.left = x * cxBlock ;
rect.top = y * cyBlock ;
rect.right = (x + 1) * cxBlock ;
rect.bottom = (y + 1) * cyBlock ;
if(IntersectRect(&DesRect,&rect,&ps.rcPaint));
Rectangle (hdc, x * cxBlock, y * cyBlock, (x + 1) * cxBlock, (y + 1) * cyBlock) ;
if (fState [x][y])
{
MoveToEx (hdc, x *cxBlock, y *cyBlock, NULL) ;
LineTo (hdc, (x+1)*cxBlock, (y+1)*cyBlock) ;
MoveToEx (hdc, x *cxBlock, (y+1)*cyBlock, NULL) ;
LineTo (hdc, (x+1)*cxBlock, y *cyBlock) ;
}//end if
}//end for
EndPaint (hwnd, &ps) ;
return 0 ;
问题:我不知道这种pain方式和原来的paint方式哪一种更合理,效率更高一些?