Small Data Transmission (二)具体过程

37 篇文章 ¥199.90 ¥299.90
本文深入探讨了5G NR中CG-SDT(Configured Grant Single Data Transmission)的具体过程,包括RRC层的初始化条件、MAC层的判断逻辑、TA验证、路径损耗参考推导等关键环节,详细阐述了CG-SDT在RRC INACTIVE状态下的传输流程,是理解5G数据传输机制的重要参考资料。

摘要生成于 C知道 ,由 DeepSeek-R1 满血版支持, 前往体验 >

 

 

这篇是SDT相关的具体过程,包括RRC层初始化SDT 的条件,MAC 层初始化SDT过程的判断,CG-SDT的具体过程,TA Validation for CG-SDT, CG-SDT TA 验证的路径损耗参考推导,SDT Uplink Time Alignment,RRC inactive中的CG based PUSCH传输和RA based PUSCH传输,依次看下。

初始化SDT的条件(38.331) 

5f7dd1e42f46e3cf4005c4cdd227df3f.png

当满足以下所有条件时,RRC_INACTIVE中的UE就会发起SDT的resume过程:

(1)上层请求恢复RRC连接; 

(2)SIB1包括sdt-ConfigCommon; 

(3)sdt-Config配置完毕; 

(4)UL中的所有待处理数据有映射到为SDT配置的RB; 

(5)对于RedCap UE,当RedCap specific initial DL BWP不包括CD-SSB时,有配置ncd-SSB-RedCapInitialBWP-SDT

### Payload vs Form Data in HTTP Requests In the context of HTTP requests, both **payload** and **form data** refer to different ways of sending information from a client to a server. Understanding how each works helps developers choose the appropriate method based on their needs. #### Definition and Usage A payload generally refers to any data sent within an HTTP request body that is intended for processing by the recipient service or application. This term encompasses various formats including JSON, XML, plain text, binary files, etc., depending upon what type of content-type header has been specified[^1]. Form data specifically pertains to key-value pairs transmitted via POST methods using `application/x-www-form-urlencoded` or `multipart/form-data`. The former encodes characters as URL parameters while multipart form data allows uploading multiple pieces of data such as file attachments alongside textual inputs without being constrained by size limits imposed by URLs[^2]. #### Differences Between Payload and Form Data The primary distinction lies in encoding mechanisms used during transmission: - With payloads, applications have greater flexibility regarding format choice since they aren't restricted solely to simple name-value collections. - Conversely, traditional web forms typically utilize either urlencoded strings (suitable only for small amounts of non-binary info) or multi-part entities designed primarily around submitting documents along with metadata describing them like filenames & MIME types[^3]. For example, consider this Python code snippet demonstrating how one might construct these two kinds of submissions programmatically: ```python import requests # Example of sending JSON payload json_payload = {"key": "value"} response_json = requests.post('https://example.com/api', json=json_payload) # Example of posting form-encoded data form_data = {'field': 'data'} files = {'file_field': open('document.pdf', 'rb')} response_form = requests.post('https://example.com/upload', data=form_data, files=files) ``` --related questions-- 1. What are some common use cases where you would prefer using a JSON payload over form data? 2. How does setting Content-Type affect handling of incoming requests at the server side? 3. Can you explain under which circumstances should multipart/form-data be utilized instead of application/x-www-form-urlencoded? 4. Are there performance implications associated with choosing between these submission styles? 5. In RESTful API design principles, do recommendations exist concerning selection among available media types?
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包

打赏作者

modem协议笔记

你的鼓励将是我创作的最大动力

¥1 ¥2 ¥4 ¥6 ¥10 ¥20
扫码支付:¥1
获取中
扫码支付

您的余额不足,请更换扫码支付或充值

打赏作者

实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值