对冲基金经理的告别信 (ZT)

转载 2008年10月18日 05:50:00

写信的人叫Andrew,是加州对冲基金Lahde Capital的基金经理。去年做空次贷,使得他的基金年回报高达866%。今年他决定牛放桃林,马勒戈壁,关掉基金回家追寻逝水流年,就写了这封言辞激烈的信。嘿嘿,慢慢欣赏吧。

Dear Investor:

Today I write not to gloat. Given the pain that nearly everyone is experiencing, that would be entirely inappropriate. Nor am I writing to make further predictions, as most of my forecasts in previous letters have unfolded or are in the process of unfolding. Instead, I am writing to say goodbye.

Recently, on the front page of Section C of the Wall Street Journal, a hedge fund manager who was also closing up shop (a $300 million fund), was quoted as saying, “What I have learned about the hedge fund business is that I hate it.” I could not agree more with that statement. I was in this game for the money. The low hanging fruit, i.e. idiots whose parents paid for prep school, Yale, and then the Harvard MBA, was there for the taking. These people who were (often) truly not worthy of the education they received (or supposedly received) rose to the top of companies such as AIG, Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers and all levels of our government. All of this behavior supporting the Aristocracy, only ended up making it easier for me to find people stupid enough to take the other side of my trades. God bless America.

There are far too many people for me to sincerely thank for my success. However, I do not want to sound like a Hollywood actor accepting an award. The money was reward enough. Furthermore, the endless list those deserving thanks know who they are.

I will no longer manage money for other people or institutions. I have enough of my own wealth to manage. Some people, who think they have arrived at a reasonable estimate of my net worth, might be surprised that I would call it quits with such a small war chest. That is fine; I am content with my rewards. Moreover, I will let others try to amass nine, ten or eleven figure net worths. Meanwhile, their lives suck. Appointments back to back, booked solid for the next three months, they look forward to their two week vacation in January during which they will likely be glued to their Blackberries or other such devices. What is the point? They will all be forgotten in fifty years anyway. Steve Balmer, Steven Cohen, and Larry Ellison will all be forgotten. I do not understand the legacy thing. Nearly everyone will be forgotten. Give up on leaving your mark. Throw the Blackberry away and enjoy life.

So this is it. With all due respect, I am dropping out. Please do not expect any type of reply to emails or voicemails within normal time frames or at all. Andy Springer and his company will be handling the dissolution of the fund. And don’t worry about my employees, they were always employed by Mr. Springer’s company and only one (who has been well-rewarded) will lose his job.

I have no interest in any deals in which anyone would like me to participate. I truly do not have a strong opinion about any market right now, other than to say that things will continue to get worse for some time, probably years. I am content sitting on the sidelines and waiting. After all, sitting and waiting is how we made money from the subprime debacle. I now have time to repair my health, which was destroyed by the stress I layered onto myself over the past two years, as well as my entire life — where I had to compete for spaces in universities and graduate schools, jobs and assets under management — with those who had all the advantages (rich parents) that I did not. May meritocracy be part of a new form of government, which needs to be established.

On the issue of the U.S. Government, I would like to make a modest proposal. First, I point out the obvious flaws, whereby legislation was repeatedly brought forth to Congress over the past eight years, which would have reigned in the predatory lending practices of now mostly defunct institutions. These institutions regularly filled the coffers of both parties in return for voting down all of this legislation designed to protect the common citizen. This is an outrage, yet no one seems to know or care about it. Since Thomas Jefferson and Adam Smith passed, I would argue that there has been a dearth of worthy philosophers in this country, at least ones focused on improving government. Capitalism worked for two hundred years, but times change, and systems become corrupt. George Soros, a man of staggering wealth, has stated that he would like to be remembered as a philosopher. My suggestion is that this great man start and sponsor a forum for great minds to come together to create a new system of government that truly represents the common man’s interest, while at the same time creating rewards great enough to attract the best and brightest minds to serve in government roles without having to rely on corruption to further their interests or lifestyles. This forum could be similar to the one used to create the operating system, Linux, which competes with Microsoft’s near monopoly. I believe there is an answer, but for now the system is clearly broken.

Lastly, while I still have an audience, I would like to bring attention to an alternative food and energy source. You won’t see it included in BP’s, “Feel good. We are working on sustainable solutions,” television commercials, nor is it mentioned in ADM’s similar commercials. But hemp has been used for at least 5,000 years for cloth and food, as well as just about everything that is produced from petroleum products. Hemp is not marijuana and vice versa. Hemp is the male plant and it grows like a weed, hence the slang term. The original American flag was made of hemp fiber and our Constitution was printed on paper made of hemp. It was used as recently as World War II by the U.S. Government, and then promptly made illegal after the war was won. At a time when rhetoric is flying about becoming more self-sufficient in terms of energy, why is it illegal to grow this plant in this country? Ah, the female. The evil female plant — marijuana. It gets you high, it makes you laugh, it does not produce a hangover. Unlike alcohol, it does not result in bar fights or wife beating. So, why is this innocuous plant illegal? Is it a gateway drug? No, that would be alcohol, which is so heavily advertised in this country. My only conclusion as to why it is illegal, is that Corporate America, which owns Congress, would rather sell you Paxil, Zoloft, Xanax and other additive drugs, than allow you to grow a plant in your home without some of the profits going into their coffers. This policy is ludicrous. It has surely contributed to our dependency on foreign energy sources. Our policies have other countries literally laughing at our stupidity, most notably Canada, as well as several European nations (both Eastern and Western). You would not know this by paying attention to U.S. media sources though, as they tend not to elaborate on who is laughing at the United States this week. Please people, let’s stop the rhetoric and start thinking about how we can truly become self-sufficient.

With that I say good-bye and good luck.

All the best,

Andrew Lahde”


  • wowotuo
  • wowotuo
  • 2016年12月18日 11:19
  • 635


詹姆斯·西蒙斯是世界级的数学家,也是最伟大的对冲基金经理之一。2005年,西蒙斯成为全球收入最高的对冲基金经理,净赚15亿美元,差不多是索罗斯的两倍。07 年收入28亿美元排名第三.从1988年开始,...
  • itbright
  • itbright
  • 2008年06月17日 23:52
  • 613


作者 本·格策尔 全文翻译自《连线》“The Rise of the Artificially Intelligent Hedge Fund”一文 今年1月下旬,本·格策尔(Ben Goertz...
  • Richard_More
  • Richard_More
  • 2016年11月09日 16:15
  • 1742


全球顶级对冲基金TOP50原创 2016-08-22 胡逸豪、郑明 对冲笔记http://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzI0MTIwNjkzMA==&mid=265295793...
  • wowotuo
  • wowotuo
  • 2016年08月22日 21:33
  • 1253


作者:flyerye 链接:https://www.zhihu.com/question/26594258/answer/271090168 来源:知乎 著作权归作者所有。商业转载请联系作者获得...
  • xuxiatian
  • xuxiatian
  • 2018年01月08日 13:39
  • 120


区块链及其相关技术是否会被用来复制现有的在线垄断市场或让他们真正地开放,使所有市场参与者都能参与更民主、更开放的市场? 有可能的是现有的参与者(银行、券商、交易所等)将试图把中介为基础的商业模式转为...
  • qq53016353
  • qq53016353
  • 2016年04月18日 22:08
  • 181


  • IJXR1A64JI53L
  • IJXR1A64JI53L
  • 2018年01月28日 00:00
  • 74

(转)知乎:如何看待巴菲特有望赢得与对冲基金 10 年赌局?

  • wowotuo
  • wowotuo
  • 2017年05月06日 20:35
  • 607


  • kittyjie
  • kittyjie
  • 2017年05月19日 10:45
  • 603


当被问及是否知道有不利用内幕信息的基金时,一位交易员的回答是:“No,这样的基金将永远无法生存!” 这是2017年2月出版的新书,《黑色优势:内幕信息,脏钱,和将华尔街头号“要犯”拉下马的旅程......
  • wowotuo
  • wowotuo
  • 2017年04月17日 22:16
  • 1759
您举报文章:对冲基金经理的告别信 (ZT)