Ref: https://blog.csdn.net/u010159842/article/details/83614791
https://blog.csdn.net/u011534057/article/details/51452564
train loss 不断下降,test loss趋于不变,说明网络过拟合;
Thus I will redesign the network .
To go througth the data of the classes, I use keyboard from matlab to view them
matlab keyboard
i=1;
while(1)
[~,~,button]=ginput(1);
button
switch button
case 28 %left
i=i-1
case 29 %right
i=i+1
case 27
break;
end
end
Although the three classes are ovbvious different, but the deep model is still not sensitve to classify them.
deep learning with time-frequency features
CWT and its frequecyfilter have been taken to improve its accuracy, the major problem is the mis-classify with joint and moisture...
Use Resenet 18 network
Accuracy of Validation is 89.4% for time-frequency features.
Although it has high accuracy on test dataset, the result is very bad on field dataset.
Try use image ,not data.