3D Vision Rebuttal
最近投递了一篇文章至CCF C类3D Vision 会议,对审稿人的审稿意见的格式进行简要的总结。主要从6个方面来呈现审稿人的审稿意见。
1. Summary
In 3-5 sentences, describe the key ideas, experiments, and their significance.
大意:让审稿人用3~5句话,描述论文的关键思想,实验,以及重要性。
简而言之:这篇文章写了啥。
2. Strengths
What are the strengths of the paper ? Clearly explain why these aspects of the paper are valuable.
大意:文章的优势是什么?清晰地解释为什么这个优势是有价值的?
3. Weaknesses
What are the weaknesses of the paper ? Clearly explain why these aspects of the paper are weak. Please make concrete comments based on facts (e.g. list relevant citations if you feel the ideas are not novel). Note that comparisons to unpublished papers and papers published after the 3DV 2020 deadline are not required
大意:该论文的弱点是什么?清晰地解释论文这个方面为什么是弱点?请给出具体的评论。(例如:如果你觉得这个想法没有创新性,请列出相关的引用。)请注意,不需要与未发表的论文和3DV 2020截止日期后发表的论文进行比较。
4. Rating
Pre-rebuttal paper rating
审稿结果:接受 Accept, Weak Reject, Reject, Strong Reject …
5. Justification of rating
Please explain how the rating was determined. Also mention what the rebuttal is expected to address.
请解释是如何确定审稿的结果。同时要提到rebuttal 期望要解决的问题。
6. Additional comments
Any further comments to the authors, including suggestions for strengthening the submission.