首先需要知道一点，只要你触摸到了任何一个控件，首先一定会调用该控件的dispatchTouchEvent方法。当我们去点击按钮的时候，就会去调用Button类里的dispatchTouchEvent方法，可是你会发现Button类里并没有这个方法，那么就到它的父类TextView里去找一找，你会发现TextView里也没有这个方法，那没办法了，只好继续在TextView的父类View里找一找，这个时候你终于在View里找到了这个方法，示意图如下：
然后我们来看一下View中dispatchTouchEvent方法的源码：
public boolean dispatchTouchEvent(MotionEvent event) {
boolean result = false;
…………
//noinspection SimplifiableIfStatement
ListenerInfo li = mListenerInfo;
if (li != null && li.mOnTouchListener != null
&& (mViewFlags & ENABLED_MASK) == ENABLED
&& li.mOnTouchListener.onTouch(this, event)) {
result = true;
}
if (!result && onTouchEvent(event)) {
result = true;
}
…………
return result;
}这里只展示了能够反应事件分发的主要代码。我们可以看到，在这个方法内，首先是进行了一个判断，如果li !=null，li.mOnTouchListener != null，(mViewFlags & ENABLED_MASK) == ENABLED和li.mOnTouchListener.onTouch(this, event)这三个条件都为真，li.mOnTouchListener.onTouch(this, event)为true说明点击时间被消耗掉了，这个时候直接返回true，不往下执行了，否则就去执行onTouchEvent(event)方法并返回。
li是ListenerInfo的一个实例，ListenerInfo是View的一个静态内部类，其中包含了View的各种事件监听。例如 OnFocusChangeListener，OnClickListener，OnLongClickListener，OnTouchListener等。当我们通过set**Listener()给view设置事件监听的时候，li即会被创建，并对其内部的On**Listener进行赋值。
所以说如果我们给一个控件注册了touch事件，那么li就一定被创建了，并且li.mOnTouchListener也一定被赋值了。
第三个条件(mViewFlags & ENABLED_MASK) == ENABLED是判断当前点击的控件是否是enable的，按钮默认都是enable的，因此这个条件恒定为true。
第四个条件就比较关键了，mOnTouchListener.onTouch(this, event)，其实也就是去回调控件注册touch事件时的onTouch方法。也就是说如果我们在onTouch方法里返回true，就会让这三个条件全部成立，从而整个方法直接返回true。如果我们在onTouch方法里返回false，就会再去执行onTouchEvent(event)方法。
小结一下view事件分发函数调用顺序:
mOnTouchListener.onTouch返回false就会去执行onTouchEvent(event)方法，，下面我们来看看onTouchEvent(event)方法：
public boolean onTouchEvent(MotionEvent event) {
final float x = event.getX();
final float y = event.getY();
final int viewFlags = mViewFlags;
if ((viewFlags & ENABLED_MASK) == DISABLED) {
if (event.getAction() == MotionEvent.ACTION_UP && (mPrivateFlags & PFLAG_PRESSED) != 0) {
setPressed(false);
}
// A disabled view that is clickable still consumes the touch
// events, it just doesn't respond to them.
return (((viewFlags & CLICKABLE) == CLICKABLE ||
(viewFlags & LONG_CLICKABLE) == LONG_CLICKABLE));
}
if (mTouchDelegate != null) {
if (mTouchDelegate.onTouchEvent(event)) {
return true;
}
}
if (((viewFlags & CLICKABLE) == CLICKABLE ||
(viewFlags & LONG_CLICKABLE) == LONG_CLICKABLE)) {
switch (event.getAction()) {
case MotionEvent.ACTION_UP:
boolean prepressed = (mPrivateFlags & PFLAG_PREPRESSED) != 0;
if ((mPrivateFlags & PFLAG_PRESSED) != 0 || prepressed) {
// take focus if we don't have it already and we should in
// touch mode.
boolean focusTaken = false;
if (isFocusable() && isFocusableInTouchMode() && !isFocused()) {
focusTaken = requestFocus();
}
if (prepressed) {
// The button is being released before we actually
// showed it as pressed. Make it show the pressed
// state now (before scheduling the click) to ensure
// the user sees it.
setPressed(true, x, y);
}
if (!mHasPerformedLongPress) {
// This is a tap, so remove the longpress check
removeLongPressCallback();
// Only perform take click actions if we were in the pressed state
if (!focusTaken) {
// Use a Runnable and post this rather than calling
// performClick directly. This lets other visual state
// of the view update before click actions start.
if (mPerformClick == null) {
mPerformClick = new PerformClick();
}
if (!post(mPerformClick)) {
performClick();
}
}
}
if (mUnsetPressedState == null) {
mUnsetPressedState = new UnsetPressedState();
}
if (prepressed) {
postDelayed(mUnsetPressedState,
ViewConfiguration.getPressedStateDuration());
} else if (!post(mUnsetPressedState)) {
// If the post failed, unpress right now
mUnsetPressedState.run();
}
removeTapCallback();
}
……
break;
}
return true;
}
return false;
}
相较于刚才的dispatchTouchEvent方法，onTouchEvent方法复杂了很多，不过没关系，我们只挑重点看就可以了。
首先在第22行我们可以看出，如果该控件是可以点击的就会进入到第24行的switch判断中去，而如果当前的事件是抬起手指，则会进入到MotionEvent.ACTION_UP这个case当中。在经过种种判断之后，会执行到第56行的performClick()方法，那我们进入到这个方法里瞧一瞧：
public boolean performClick() {
final boolean result;
final ListenerInfo li = mListenerInfo;
if (li != null && li.mOnClickListener != null) {
playSoundEffect(SoundEffectConstants.CLICK);
li.mOnClickListener.onClick(this);
result = true;
} else {
result = false;
}
sendAccessibilityEvent(AccessibilityEvent.TYPE_VIEW_CLICKED);
return result;
}可以看到，只要li不为null且li.mOnClickListener不是null，就会去调用它的onClick方法
这样View的整个事件分发的流程就让我们搞清楚了！还有一个很重要的知识点需要说明，就是touch事件的层级传递。我们都知道如果给一个控件注册了touch事件，每次点击它的时候都会触发一系列的ACTION_DOWN，ACTION_MOVE，ACTION_UP等事件。这里需要注意，如果你在执行ACTION_DOWN的时候返回了false，后面一系列其它的action就不会再得到执行了。简单的说，就是当dispatchTouchEvent在进行事件分发的时候，只有前一个action返回true，才会触发后一个action。
当ACTION_DOWN的时候返回 false，ACTION_MOVE，ACTION_UP等事件事件也不回执行。
Android中touch事件的传递，绝对是先传递到ViewGroup，再传递到View的。实际情况是，当你点击了某个控件，首先会去调用该控件所在布局的dispatchTouchEvent方法，然后在布局的dispatchTouchEvent方法中找到被点击的相应控件，再去调用该控件的dispatchTouchEvent方法。
如果我们点击了MyLayout中的按钮，会先去调用MyLayout的dispatchTouchEvent方法，可是你会发现MyLayout中并没有这个方法。那就再到它的父类LinearLayout中找一找，发现也没有这个方法。那只好继续再找LinearLayout的父类ViewGroup，你终于在ViewGroup中看到了这个方法，按钮的dispatchTouchEvent方法就是在这里调用的。修改后的示意图如下所示：
接下来，我们去看一看ViewGroup中的dispatchTouchEvent方法的源码吧
@Override
public boolean dispatchTouchEvent(MotionEvent ev) {
if (mInputEventConsistencyVerifier != null) {
mInputEventConsistencyVerifier.onTouchEvent(ev, 1);
}
// If the event targets the accessibility focused view and this is it, start
// normal event dispatch. Maybe a descendant is what will handle the click.
if (ev.isTargetAccessibilityFocus() && isAccessibilityFocusedViewOrHost()) {
ev.setTargetAccessibilityFocus(false);
}
boolean handled = false;
if (onFilterTouchEventForSecurity(ev)) {
final int action = ev.getAction();
final int actionMasked = action & MotionEvent.ACTION_MASK;
// Handle an initial down.
if (actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN) {
// Throw away all previous state when starting a new touch gesture.
// The framework may have dropped the up or cancel event for the previous gesture
// due to an app switch, ANR, or some other state change.
cancelAndClearTouchTargets(ev);
resetTouchState();
}
// Check for interception.
final boolean intercepted;
if (actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN
|| mFirstTouchTarget != null) {
final boolean disallowIntercept = (mGroupFlags & FLAG_DISALLOW_INTERCEPT) != 0;
if (!disallowIntercept) {
intercepted = onInterceptTouchEvent(ev);
ev.setAction(action); // restore action in case it was changed
} else {
intercepted = false;
}
} else {
// There are no touch targets and this action is not an initial down
// so this view group continues to intercept touches.
intercepted = true;
}
// If intercepted, start normal event dispatch. Also if there is already
// a view that is handling the gesture, do normal event dispatch.
if (intercepted || mFirstTouchTarget != null) {
ev.setTargetAccessibilityFocus(false);
}
// Check for cancelation.
final boolean canceled = resetCancelNextUpFlag(this)
|| actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_CANCEL;
// Update list of touch targets for pointer down, if needed.
final boolean split = (mGroupFlags & FLAG_SPLIT_MOTION_EVENTS) != 0;
TouchTarget newTouchTarget = null;
boolean alreadyDispatchedToNewTouchTarget = false;
if (!canceled && !intercepted) {
// If the event is targeting accessiiblity focus we give it to the
// view that has accessibility focus and if it does not handle it
// we clear the flag and dispatch the event to all children as usual.
// We are looking up the accessibility focused host to avoid keeping
// state since these events are very rare.
View childWithAccessibilityFocus = ev.isTargetAccessibilityFocus()
? findChildWithAccessibilityFocus() : null;
if (actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN
|| (split && actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_POINTER_DOWN)
|| actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_HOVER_MOVE) {
final int actionIndex = ev.getActionIndex(); // always 0 for down
final int idBitsToAssign = split ? 1 << ev.getPointerId(actionIndex)
: TouchTarget.ALL_POINTER_IDS;
// Clean up earlier touch targets for this pointer id in case they
// have become out of sync.
removePointersFromTouchTargets(idBitsToAssign);
final int childrenCount = mChildrenCount;
if (newTouchTarget == null && childrenCount != 0) {
final float x = ev.getX(actionIndex);
final float y = ev.getY(actionIndex);
// Find a child that can receive the event.
// Scan children from front to back.
final ArrayList<View> preorderedList = buildTouchDispatchChildList();
final boolean customOrder = preorderedList == null
&& isChildrenDrawingOrderEnabled();
final View[] children = mChildren;
for (int i = childrenCount - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
final int childIndex = getAndVerifyPreorderedIndex(
childrenCount, i, customOrder);
final View child = getAndVerifyPreorderedView(
preorderedList, children, childIndex);
// If there is a view that has accessibility focus we want it
// to get the event first and if not handled we will perform a
// normal dispatch. We may do a double iteration but this is
// safer given the timeframe.
if (childWithAccessibilityFocus != null) {
if (childWithAccessibilityFocus != child) {
continue;
}
childWithAccessibilityFocus = null;
i = childrenCount - 1;
}
if (!canViewReceivePointerEvents(child)
|| !isTransformedTouchPointInView(x, y, child, null)) {
ev.setTargetAccessibilityFocus(false);
continue;
}
newTouchTarget = getTouchTarget(child);
if (newTouchTarget != null) {
// Child is already receiving touch within its bounds.
// Give it the new pointer in addition to the ones it is handling.
newTouchTarget.pointerIdBits |= idBitsToAssign;
break;
}
resetCancelNextUpFlag(child);
if (dispatchTransformedTouchEvent(ev, false, child, idBitsToAssign)) {
// Child wants to receive touch within its bounds.
mLastTouchDownTime = ev.getDownTime();
if (preorderedList != null) {
// childIndex points into presorted list, find original index
for (int j = 0; j < childrenCount; j++) {
if (children[childIndex] == mChildren[j]) {
mLastTouchDownIndex = j;
break;
}
}
} else {
mLastTouchDownIndex = childIndex;
}
mLastTouchDownX = ev.getX();
mLastTouchDownY = ev.getY();
newTouchTarget = addTouchTarget(child, idBitsToAssign);
alreadyDispatchedToNewTouchTarget = true;
break;
}
// The accessibility focus didn't handle the event, so clear
// the flag and do a normal dispatch to all children.
ev.setTargetAccessibilityFocus(false);
}
if (preorderedList != null) preorderedList.clear();
}
if (newTouchTarget == null && mFirstTouchTarget != null) {
// Did not find a child to receive the event.
// Assign the pointer to the least recently added target.
newTouchTarget = mFirstTouchTarget;
while (newTouchTarget.next != null) {
newTouchTarget = newTouchTarget.next;
}
newTouchTarget.pointerIdBits |= idBitsToAssign;
}
}
}
// Dispatch to touch targets.
if (mFirstTouchTarget == null) {
// No touch targets so treat this as an ordinary view.
handled = dispatchTransformedTouchEvent(ev, canceled, null,
TouchTarget.ALL_POINTER_IDS);
} else {
// Dispatch to touch targets, excluding the new touch target if we already
// dispatched to it. Cancel touch targets if necessary.
TouchTarget predecessor = null;
TouchTarget target = mFirstTouchTarget;
while (target != null) {
final TouchTarget next = target.next;
if (alreadyDispatchedToNewTouchTarget && target == newTouchTarget) {
handled = true;
} else {
final boolean cancelChild = resetCancelNextUpFlag(target.child)
|| intercepted;
if (dispatchTransformedTouchEvent(ev, cancelChild,
target.child, target.pointerIdBits)) {
handled = true;
}
if (cancelChild) {
if (predecessor == null) {
mFirstTouchTarget = next;
} else {
predecessor.next = next;
}
target.recycle();
target = next;
continue;
}
}
predecessor = target;
target = next;
}
}
// Update list of touch targets for pointer up or cancel, if needed.
if (canceled
|| actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_UP
|| actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_HOVER_MOVE) {
resetTouchState();
} else if (split && actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_POINTER_UP) {
final int actionIndex = ev.getActionIndex();
final int idBitsToRemove = 1 << ev.getPointerId(actionIndex);
removePointersFromTouchTargets(idBitsToRemove);
}
}
if (!handled && mInputEventConsistencyVerifier != null) {
mInputEventConsistencyVerifier.onUnhandledEvent(ev, 1);
}
return handled;
} 这个方法代码比较长，我们只挑重点看。从第28到第42行，如果disallowIntercept=true（不允许拦截）或者disallowIntercept = false且 onInterceptTouchEvent(ev) = false （允许拦截但是没拦截）就会进入到就会进入到第58行这个条件判断中。
disallowIntercept是指是否禁用掉事件拦截的功能，默认是false，也可以通过调用requestDisallowInterceptTouchEvent方法对这个值进行修改。
ViewGroup的onInterceptTouchEvent方法对事件传递进行拦截，onInterceptTouchEvent方法返回true代表不允许事件继续向子View传递，返回false代表不对事件进行拦截，默认返回false。
一下用流程图的方式，向大家展示一下view的事件分发流程：
扫一扫
2875
被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?
到【灌水乐园】发言
