GEM5教程： stats.txt 结果分析

常用的结果1：仿真指令数 simInst

不影响结果，只是跑的慢一点，花地球时间花的久一点才进系统。
下面是我们运行的代码，然后我们来看stat.txt

cd /home/gem5/parsec-benchmark; source env.sh; parsecmgmt -a run -p blackscholes  -c gcc-hooks -i simsmall  -n 2; sleep 5; m5 exit;

模拟运行了11.6s,我们的simInsts 仿真指令数是3，710，533，377，也就是3.7x1e9.
地球时间花了 11577.30 s，也就是192分钟，3个小时多。
我们的simOps 仿真操作数是 7659803667也就是 7.7x1e9.

--------- Begin Simulation Statistics ----------
simSeconds                                  11.651543                       # Number of seconds simulated (Second)
simTicks                                 11,651,542,566,501                       # Number of ticks simulated (Tick)
finalTick                                11651542566501                       # Number of ticks from beginning of simulation (restored from checkpoints and never reset) (Tick)
simFreq                                  1000,000,000,000                       # The number of ticks per simulated second ((Tick/Second))
hostSeconds                                  11577.30                       # Real time elapsed on the host (Second)
hostTickRate                               1006412843                       # The number of ticks simulated per host second (ticks/s) ((Tick/Second))
hostMemory                                   17317040                       # Number of bytes of host memory used (Byte)
simInsts                                   3710533377                       # Number of instructions simulated (Count)
simOps                                     7659803667                       # Number of ops (including micro ops) simulated (Count)
hostInstRate                                   320501                       # Simulator instruction rate (inst/s) ((Count/Second))
hostOpRate                                     661623                       # Simulator op (including micro ops) rate (op/s) ((Count/Second))

很多文章不喜欢给绝对值,但我还是努力找了一些。
作为对比，看看arm rsk给的结果。用的simsmall， 模拟的2-core 4Ghz ，花了2x1e9。


如果是gem5 的教程，用了一堆gem5art的，单核跑blackscholes，simsmall是 ～4x1e3 million=4x1e9。

作为对比，我们的用了garnet的x86-moeshi hammer是3.7x1e9的指令，gem5教程的x86用的是看上去4x1e9的指令，arm的则用了2x1e9多一点。

常用的结果1：仿真时间 simSeconds

gem5 parsec教程用的无garnet的cpu，仿真时间是0.2s左右。作为对比，我们的是11.6左右。

其他结果： IPC

我们的IPC结果是0.053，0.024,0.043,0.038。其中cpu1的ipc很低，可以留待以后观察。

system.cpu0.commitStats0.cpi                18.805689                       # CPI: cycles per instruction (thread level) ((Cycle/Count))
system.cpu0.commitStats0.ipc                 0.053175                       # IPC: instructions per cycle (thread level) ((Count/Cycle))
system.cpu1.cpi                             41.318331                       # CPI: cycles per instruction (core level) ((Cycle/Count))
system.cpu1.ipc                              0.024202                       # IPC: instructions per cycle (core level) ((Count/Cycle))
system.cpu2.cpi                             22.875346                       # CPI: cycles per instruction (core level) ((Cycle/Count))
system.cpu2.ipc                              0.043715                       # IPC: instructions per cycle (core level) ((Count/Cycle))
system.cpu3.commitStats0.cpi                26.217850                       # CPI: cycles per instruction (thread level) ((Cycle/Count))
system.cpu3.commitStats0.ipc                 0.038142                       # IPC: instructions per cycle (thread level) ((Count/Cycle))