z世代中的z是什么意思
A study by College Reaction carried out for Axios concludes that members of Generation Z, those born between 1995 and 2010, are more likely to see fake news for what it is because they apply more context, nuance and skepticism when consuming information.
College Reaction针对Axios进行的一项研究得出的结论是，出生于1995年至2010年之间的Z世代成员更容易看到虚假新闻，因为他们在消费信息时运用了更多的语境，细微差别和怀疑态度。
As a business school professor who has been teaching Generation Z for a few years now, my experience suggests otherwise, and that assuming that this cohort is somehow immune or, as the article claims, possess some sort of “innate superiority” is a big mistake, comparable to the now discredited idea of digital natives.
作为已经教授Z代几年的商学院教授，我的经验提出了另外一个建议，并且假设这个队列在某种程度上是免疫的，或者如本文所述，拥有某种“先天优势”是一个大错误。相当于现在失去信誉的数字原住民的想法。
Believing that young people are somehow imbued with greater awareness of how the digital world works will only perpetuate the problem, because it implies there’s no need to teach them how to make the most of the internet. The simple truth is that no generation is more or less prepared than the previous one for anything: there are no genetic differences between one generation and another, evolution moves slowly, and changes to the species come through mutations that occur by chance and somehow condition the reproductive success of some individuals with respect to others. In other words, it is just flat wrong to think that Generation Z’s genetics are different to those of its parents or grandparents. That’s not how genetics work.
相信年轻人对数字世界的运作方式有了更深入的了解只会使这个问题永存，因为这意味着没有必要教他们如何充分利用互联网。 一个简单的事实是，没有任何一个世代比前一个世代有更多或更少的准备：一个世代与另一个世代之间没有遗传差异，进化缓慢，物种的变化是通过偶然发生的突变而发生的，并以某种方式调节了一些人相对于其他人的生殖成功。 换句话说，认为Z世代的遗传与其父母或祖父母的遗传不同是完全错误的。 这不是遗传学的工作原理。
It is true that Generation Z was born into a world in which the internet already existed and so will be familiar with it from an early age, which in turn might influence experience-based learning processes, as the genius Randall Munroe pointed out in one of his comic strips. But this experience produces very unequal results and, above all, not sufficiently structured or formalized: it is possible that the members of Generation Z are less likely to believe hoaxes or fake news than their parents and grandparents, but that does not mean at all that they are somehow “immunized” against them. In fact, in discussions in my classes with Generation Z students I am constantly confronted with myths, fake news or misinterpreted headlines, and I am constantly having to explain reality to them.
的确，Z世代出生于一个已经存在互联网的世界，因此从小就熟悉互联网，这反过来可能会影响基于经验的学习过程，正如天才Randall Munroe指出的那样：他的漫画。 但是这种经历会产生非常不平等的结果，最重要的是，这种结构化或形式化不够充分： Z世代的成员相信其骗局或假新闻的可能性可能比其父母和祖父母少，但这并不意味着他们以某种方式“免疫”了他们。 实际上，在与Z代学生的课堂讨论中，我经常遇到神话，虚假新闻或误解性的头条新闻，而且我不断向他们解释现实。
If learning how to verify, fact-check and use critical judgment is not a central part of the educational process, then a great many members of this and every generation will, in all likelihood grow up believing a lot of the garbage circulating online. Finland’s decision to formalize the teaching of these skills, instead of assuming that children are somehow “born ready” seems to be working well, and should serve as a model for other countries. Vulnerability to fake news depends not only on age, but to a large extent on our online experience, willingness to invest effort in fact checking, and other factors, such as hearing the same lies repeated over and over again.
如果学习如何验证，事实核对和使用批判性判断不是教育过程的中心部分，那么这一代以及每一代的许多成员很可能会长大，并相信很多在线上流传的垃圾。 芬兰决定将这些技能的教学正规化，而不是假设孩子已经以某种方式“天生就准备好了”，这似乎是行之有效的，应该成为其他国家的榜样。 虚假新闻的脆弱性不仅取决于年龄，而且在很大程度上取决于我们的在线体验，是否愿意投入精力进行事实核查以及其他因素，例如一遍又一遍地听到相同的谎言。
A balanced diet of information and a systematic and structured knowledge of the processes of viral transmission or of the profiles that tend to spread false information are fundamental if we are to expose fake news for what it is. Social networks lacking any kind of ethical principles, like Facebook — which puts its metrics above applying mechanisms to stop the spread of fake news — are extremely dangerous, as we have seen in Myanmar, Nigeria and many other countries, and as we are now unfortunately about to see in Ethiopia. In this sense, young people may learn more quickly than their elders, but they are still exposed to fake news, which is increasingly being spread through sophisticated strategies that require properly formalized learning processes.
如果我们要揭露虚假新闻的本质，那么就必须保持均衡的信息饮食以及对病毒传播过程或易于传播虚假信息的系统信息的系统化和结构化了解。 正如我们在缅甸，尼日利亚和许多其他国家所看到的那样，缺乏任何道德原则的社交网络，例如Facebook (其指标超出应用制止假新闻传播的机制)，都极为危险，正如我们在缅甸，尼日利亚和许多其他国家所看到的那样，现在很不幸即将在埃塞俄比亚见到。 从这个意义上讲，年轻人可能比年长者学习得更快，但他们仍然容易受到假新闻的影响，假新闻正通过要求适当正规化学习过程的复杂策略不断传播。
Let’s learn from previous mistakes: young people are not “digital natives”, and thinking that because they are young, we don’t need to worry about educating them to use their critical faculties, will only produce “digital orphans”, condemned to learn by trial and error, and even then, only if they really show a will and an interest in learning. Social networks operate in a specific context with their own rules, rules that are fundamental to know and understand. Focusing education on the development of critical thinking is the only alternative we have to avoid turning fake news into a legacy that will be perpetuated by the next generation.
让我们从以前的错误中学习：年轻人不是“数字原住民”，并认为因为他们年轻，我们不必担心要教育他们使用批判性的能力，只会产生“数字孤儿”，注定要学习通过反复试验，即使如此，也只有在他们真的表现出意志和对学习的兴趣时。 社交网络在特定的上下文中使用自己的规则运行，这些规则是了解和理解的基础。 将教育集中在批判性思维的发展上是我们唯一的选择，可以避免将假新闻转变为下一代将延续的遗产。
z世代中的z是什么意思
扫一扫
6039
被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?
到【灌水乐园】发言
