vivado windows linux,Vivado 2017.4和2018.2不同的Linux和Windows之间的实现结果

嗨，

我有一个越来越难以在Vivado 2017.4中路由的设计。

我的大多数运行都是在Linux上完成的。

我也尝试过使用Windows机器，它可以产生更好的效果。

我切换到Vivado 2018.2，它在Linux中提供了更好的结果(非常低的TNS)和Windows中的良好时序(没有时序违规)。

我比较了Linux和Windows运行之间的综合日志，发现没有相关的差异。

但是比较实施日志显示，在Linux中，该工具发现设计难以路由(高拥塞)，而在Windows中，该工具没有报告拥塞问题，并且能够关闭时间。

如何在Linux中复制Windows结果(我需要在Linux机器上提交构建版本)？

谢谢，

米歇尔

以上来自于谷歌翻译以下为原文

Hi,

I have a design which is increasingly dIFficult to route in Vivado 2017.4. Most of my runs have been done on Linux. I have also tried with a Windows machine which yielded much better results.

I switched to Vivado 2018.2 which provided better results in Linux (very low TNS) and good timing in Windows (no timing violations).

I have compared the synthesis logs between the Linux and Windows runs and found no relevant differences. But comparing the implementation logs showed that in Linux the tool found the design difficult to route (high congestion) while in Windows the tool did not report congestion issues and was able to close timing.

How can I replicate the Windows results in Linux (I need to submit builds on Linux machines)?

Thanks,

Michel

0