Levenberg-Marquardt算法与透视变换矩阵优化

一般来说我们利用牛顿法使用来求f(x)=0的解。求解方法如下: 
先对f(x)一阶泰勒展开得
 
                                \LARGE f(x+\triangle ) = f(x) +f'(x)\triangle

所以我们有
                    \LARGE \triangle = x -x_{0} = -\frac{f(x_{0})}{f'(x_{0}},即\LARGE \LARGE x = x_{0}-\frac{f(x_{0})}{f'(x_{0})}

因此也就得到了我们的牛顿迭代公式: 
                               \LARGE x_{n} = x_{n-1}-\frac{f(x_{n-1})}{f'(x_{n-1})}
求解最优化问题
                                \LARGE min f(x)

牛顿法首先则是将问题转化为求
                                \LARGE f'(x) = 0
这个方程的根。 
        一阶展开:
                                \LARGE f'(x) \approx f'(x_{_{0}}) +(x - x_{_{0}})f''(x_{_{0}})                    


                               \LARGE f'(x_{_{0}}) +(x - x_{_{0}})f''(x_{_{0}}) = 0

         求解得到\LARGE x,相比于\LARGE x_{0}\LARGE f'(x) < f'(x_{0})
 

高斯牛顿法

在讲牛顿法的时候,我们举的例子\LARGE x是一维的,若如果我们遇到多维的x该如何办呢?这时我们就可以利用雅克比,海赛矩阵之类的来表示高维求导函数了。 
比如
                             \LARGE f(X) = 0有,其中\LARGE X = [x_{0},x_{1},...,x_{n}]
 

所以我们有雅克比矩阵: 
                                      \LARGE J_{f} = \begin{bmatrix} \frac{\partial f_{1} }{\partial x_{0}} &... &\frac{\partial f_{1} }{\partial x_{n}}\\ &. .. & \\ \frac{\partial f_{n} }{\partial x_{0}}& ... & \frac{\partial f_{n} }{\partial x_{n}} \end{bmatrix}

有海赛矩阵: 
                                     \LARGE H_{f} = \begin{bmatrix} \frac{\partial^2 f_{1} }{\partial x_{0}^2}& \frac{\partial^2 f_{1} }{\partial x_{0}\partial x_{1}}&...&\frac{\partial^2 f_{1} }{\partial x_{0}\partial x_{n}}\\ ...& ... & ...&...\\ \frac{\partial^2 f_{n} }{\partial x_{0}^2}& \frac{\partial^2 f_{n} }{\partial x_{0}\partial x_{1}}&...&\frac{\partial^2 f_{n} }{\partial x_{0}\partial x_{n}} \end{bmatrix}
所以高维牛顿法解最优化问题又可写成: 
                                   \LARGE X_{n} = X_{n-1} - H_{f}\triangle
 

梯度 代替了低维情况中的一阶导 
Hessian矩阵代替了二阶导 
求逆代替了除法 
例:不妨设目标函数为: 
                               \LARGE s(x) = \sum_{i=0}^{n} f^{2}(x_{i})

所以梯度向量在方向上的分量: 
                              \LARGE g_{j} = 2\sum_{i=0}^{n} f_{i}\frac{\partial f_{i}}{\partial x_{j}}

Hessian 矩阵的元素则直接在梯度向量的基础上求导: 
                             \LARGE H_{jk} = 2\sum_{i=0}^{n} (\frac{\partial f_{i}}{\partial x_{j}}\frac{\partial f_{i}}{\partial x_{k}} + \frac{\partial^2 f_{i}}{\partial x_{j}\partial x_{k}})
 

高斯牛顿法的一个小技巧是,将二次偏导省略,于是: 
                             \LARGE H_{jk} \approx 2\sum_{i=0}^{n} \frac{\partial f_{i}}{\partial x_{j}}\frac{\partial f_{i}}{\partial x_{k}} = 2\sum_{i=0}^{n} J_{ij}J_{ik}

其中\LARGE J_{ij}J_{ik}为雅克比矩阵中的第i行j列元素 
改写成 矩阵相乘形式: 

                                 \LARGE H\approx 2J_{f}^{T}J_{f}  

代入牛顿法高维迭代方程的基本形式,得到高斯牛顿法迭代方程: 
                           \LARGE X_{n+1} = X_{n} - \triangle,其中\LARGE \triangle = -(J_{f}^{T}J_{f})^{-1}J_{f}^{T}f

Levenberg-Marquardt算法

引用维基百科的一句话就是:
莱文贝格-马夸特方法(Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm)能提供数非线性最小化(局部最小)的数值解。此算法能借由执行时修改参数达到结合高斯-牛顿算法以及梯度下降法的优点,并对两者之不足作改善(比如高斯-牛顿算法之反矩阵不存在或是初始值离局部极小值太远)

在我看来,就是在高斯牛顿基础上修改了一点。 
在高斯牛顿迭代法中,我们已经知道 
                            \LARGE \triangle = -(J_{f}^{T}J_{f})^{-1}J_{f}^{}

在莱文贝格-马夸特方法算法中则是 
                \LARGE \triangle = -(J_{f}^{T}J_{f} + \lambda I)^{-1}J            

在我看来好像就这点区别。至少我看的维基百科是这样的。 
然后Levenberg-Marquardt方法的好处就是在于可以调节: 
如果下降太快,使用较小的λ,使之更接近高斯牛顿法 
如果下降太慢,使用较大的λ,使之更接近梯度下降法

 

H矩阵本身已经最优,手动改变了一点测试LM。

close all;
clear all;
clc;

% 返回值 H 是一个3*3的矩阵
% pts1 和 pts2是2*n的坐标矩阵对应特征点的(x,y)坐标
CordReal = load('TestReal.txt');
CordImg = load('TestImg.txt');
pts1 = CordReal(:,1:2)';
pts2 = CordImg(:,1:2)';
n = size(pts1,2);
A = zeros(2*n,9);
A(1:2:2*n,1:2) = pts1';
A(1:2:2*n,3) = 1;
A(2:2:2*n,4:5) = pts1';
A(2:2:2*n,6) = 1;
x1 = pts1(1,:)';
y1 = pts1(2,:)';
x2 = pts2(1,:)';
y2 = pts2(2,:)';
A(1:2:2*n,7) = -x2.*x1;
A(2:2:2*n,7) = -y2.*x1;
A(1:2:2*n,8) = -x2.*y1;
A(2:2:2*n,8) = -y2.*y1;
A(1:2:2*n,9) = -x2;
A(2:2:2*n,9) = -y2;

[evec,D] = eig(A'*A);
H = reshape(evec(:,1),[3,3])';
H = H/H(end); % make H(3,3) = 1

TestReal = load('TestReal.txt');
TestImg = load('TestImg.txt');
N = size(TestReal,1);
TestRealQici = [TestReal(:,1:2),ones(N,1)];
TestImgQici = [TestImg(:,1:2),ones(N,1)];
Result = zeros(N,3);
ImgInvH = zeros(N,3);
for i=1:N
    Result(i,1)=((H(1,1)+0.01)*x1(i)+H(1,2)*y1(i)+H(1,3))./(H(3,1)*x1(i)+H(3,2)*y1(i)+H(3,3));
    Result(i,2)=(H(2,1)*x1(i)+H(2,2)*y1(i)+H(2,3))./(H(3,1)*x1(i)+H(3,2)*y1(i)+H(3,3));

%     Result(i,:)=H*TestRealQici(i,:)';
%     ImgInvH(i,:)=H\TestImgQici(i,:)';
end
 D = TestImg(:,1:2)-Result(:,1:2);
xlswrite('Result.xls',[TestImgQici Result])

%%
width = round(max(TestReal(:,1)))+50;
height = round(max(TestReal(:,2)))+50;
RealGen = 255*ones(height,width);
imshow(RealGen);
hold on;
plot(TestReal(:,1),TestReal(:,2),'k+');%黑十字
hold on;
plot(ImgInvH(:,1),ImgInvH(:,2),'r.');%红点

%___________
figure();
width = round(max(TestImg(:,1)))+30;
height = round(max(TestImg(:,2)))+30;
ImgGen = 255*ones(height,width);
imshow(ImgGen);
hold on;
plot(TestImg(:,1),TestImg(:,2),'k+');%黑十字
%___________
hold on;
plot(Result(:,1),Result(:,2),'R.');%红点



%%
%H的LM优化
% % 计算函数f的雅克比矩阵,是解析式
% syms h1 h2 h3 h4 h5 h6 h7 h8 h9 xi yi xo yo real;
% % f=(xout-(h1*xin+h2*yin+h3)./(h7*xin+h8*yin+h9)).^2+(yout-(h4*xin+h5*yin+h6)./(h7*xin+h8*yin+h9)).^2; %自己定义误差函数为各点的误差和
% f1=(h1*xi+h2*yi+h3)./(h7*yi+h8*yi+h9);
% f2=(h4*xi+h5*yi+h6)./(h7*yi+h8*yi+h9);
% Jsym = jacobian([f1;f2],[h1 h2 h3 h4 h5 h6 h7 h8 h9])
 
% 拟合用数据为x1,y1,x2,y2。
 
% 2. LM算法
% 以近似解H作为迭代初始值
h1_0 = H(1,1);
h2_0 = H(1,2);
h3_0 = H(1,3);
h4_0 = H(2,1);
h5_0 = H(2,2);
h6_0 = H(2,3);
h7_0 = H(3,1);
h8_0 = H(3,2);
h9_0 = H(3,3);

% 数据个数
Ndata=length(x1);
% 参数维数
Nparams=9;
% 迭代最大次数
n_iters=50;
% LM算法的阻尼系数初值
lamda=0.01;
lamda1=0.0001;

 
% step1: 变量赋值
updateJ=1;
h1_est = h1_0+0.01;
h2_est = h2_0;
h3_est = h3_0;
h4_est = h4_0;
h5_est = h5_0;
h6_est = h6_0;
h7_est = h7_0;
h8_est = h8_0;
h9_est = h9_0;
x_Cord_est = x2;
y_Cord_est = y2;

% step2: 迭代
% step2: 迭代
it = 1;     % 迭代计数
id = 1;     % 有效结果计数
repeat = 1; % 若误差未减小的情况连续出现次数
while repeat < 10   % 连续出现10次
    if updateJ==1
        % 根据当前估计值,计算雅克比矩阵
        J=zeros(2,Nparams);
        Jit = zeros(2*length(x1),Nparams);
        DeltaF = zeros(Nparams,2 );
        Fh0 =0;
        for i=1:length(x1)
            Jit(i,:)=[x1(i)./(h7_est*x1(i)+h8_est*y1(i)+h9_est),y1(i)./(h7_est*x1(i)+h8_est*y1(i)+h9_est),1./(h7_est*x1(i)+h8_est*y1(i)+h9_est),0,0,0,(-x1(i)*(h1_est*x1(i)+h2_est*y1(i)+h3_est))./((h7_est*x1(i)+h8_est*y1(i)+h9_est)^2),(-y1(i)*(h1_est*x1(i)+h2_est*y1(i)+h3_est))./((h7_est*x1(i)+h8_est*y1(i)+h9_est)^2),(-(h1_est*x1(i)+h2_est*y1(i)+h3_est))./((h7_est*x1(i)+h8_est*y1(i)+h9_est)^2)];
            Jit(i+1,:)=[0,0,0,x1(i)./(h7_est*x1(i)+h8_est*y1(i)+h9_est),y1(i)./(h7_est*x1(i)+h8_est*y1(i)+h9_est),1./(h7_est*x1(i)+h8_est*y1(i)+h9_est),-(x1(i)*(h4_est*x1(i)+h5_est*y1(i)+h6_est))./((h7_est*x1(i)+h8_est*y1(i)+h9_est)^2),(-y1(i)*(h4_est*x1(i)+h5_est*y1(i)+h6_est))./((h7_est*x1(i)+h8_est*y1(i)+h9_est)^2),(-(h4_est*x1(i)+h5_est*y1(i)+h6_est))./((h7_est*x1(i)+h8_est*y1(i)+h9_est)^2)];
        end 
            f1_est = (h1_est*x1+h2_est*y1+h3_est)./(h7_est*x1+h8_est*y1+h9_est);
            f2_est = (h4_est*x1+h5_est*y1+h6_est)./(h7_est*x1+h8_est*y1+h9_est);
           
             dx = x_Cord_est- f1_est;
             dy = y_Cord_est- f2_est;
             d = cat(1,dx,dy);
             Hess=Jit'*Jit;
             if repeat==1
                e=dot(d,d);
             end            
    end 
        H_lm=Hess+(lamda*eye(Nparams,Nparams));    
    % 计算步长dp,并根据步长计算新的可能的参数估计值
    if(rank(H_lm) == 9)
        break;
    end
     dp=(H_lm)\(Jit'*d(:));   
     h1_lm=h1_est+dp(1);
     h2_lm=h2_est+dp(2);
     h3_lm=h3_est+dp(3);
     h4_lm=h4_est+dp(4);
     h5_lm=h5_est+dp(5);
     h6_lm=h6_est+dp(6);
     h7_lm=h7_est+dp(7);
     h8_lm=h8_est+dp(8);
     h9_lm=h9_est+dp(9);

 
     f1_est_lm = (h1_lm*x1+h2_lm*y1+h3_lm)./(h7_lm*x1+h8_lm*y1+h9_lm);
     f2_est_lm = (h4_lm*x1+h5_lm*y1+h6_lm)./(h7_lm*x1+h8_lm*y1+h9_lm);
     dx_lm = x_Cord_est- f1_est_lm ;
     dy_lm = y_Cord_est- f2_est_lm;
     d_lm = cat(1,dx_lm ,dy_lm );
     e_lm=dot(d_lm,d_lm);
     if e_lm<e
%         if e_lm<10
%             break;
%         else
            lamda=lamda1/10;
            h1_est=h1_lm;
            h2_est=h2_lm;
            h3_est=h3_lm;
            h4_est=h4_lm;
            h5_est=h5_lm;
            h6_est=h6_lm;
            h7_est=h7_lm;
            h8_est=h8_lm;
            h9_est=h9_lm;
            e=e_lm;
            disp(e);
            updateJ=1;
            repeat=repeat+1;
%          end
    else
        updateJ=0;
        lamda=lamda*5;
     end
end
%显示优化的结果
H(1,1)=h1_est;
H(1,2)=h2_est;
H(1,3)=h3_est;
H(2,1)=h4_est;
H(2,2)=h5_est;
H(2,3)=h6_est;
H(3,1)=h7_est;
H(3,2)=h8_est;
H(3,3)=h9_est;

TestReal = load('TestReal.txt');
TestImg = load('TestImg.txt');
N = size(TestReal,1);
TestRealQici = [TestReal(:,1:2),ones(N,1)];
TestImgQici = [TestImg(:,1:2),ones(N,1)];
Result = zeros(N,3);
ImgInvH = zeros(N,3);
for i=1:N
     Result(i,1)=(H(1,1)*x1(i)+H(1,2)*y1(i)+H(1,3))./(H(3,1)*x1(i)+H(3,2)*y1(i)+H(3,3));
     Result(i,2)=(H(2,1)*x1(i)+H(2,2)*y1(i)+H(2,3))./(H(3,1)*x1(i)+H(3,2)*y1(i)+H(3,3));
    %Result(i,:)=H\TestRealQici(i,:)';
    %ImgInvH(i,:)=H*TestImgQici(i,:)';
end

xlswrite('Result.xls',[TestImgQici Result])

%%
width = round(max(TestReal(:,1)))+50;
height = round(max(TestReal(:,2)))+50;
RealGen = 255*ones(height,width);
imshow(RealGen);
hold on;
plot(TestReal(:,1),TestReal(:,2),'k+');%黑十字
hold on;
plot(ImgInvH(:,1),ImgInvH(:,2),'r.');%红点

%___________
figure();
width = round(max(TestImg(:,1)))+30;
height = round(max(TestImg(:,2)))+30;
ImgGen = 255*ones(height,width);
imshow(ImgGen);
hold on;
plot(TestImg(:,1),TestImg(:,2),'k+');%黑十字
%___________
hold on;
plot(Result(:,1),Result(:,2),'R.');%红点


 

优化后结果

 

  • 0
    点赞
  • 5
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 1
    评论

“相关推荐”对你有帮助么?

  • 非常没帮助
  • 没帮助
  • 一般
  • 有帮助
  • 非常有帮助
提交
评论 1
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值