【雷达与对抗】【2017.03】偏振成像相机比较研究

本文为美国海军研究生院（作者：Jarrad A. Smoke）的硕士论文，共100页。

本文是对两台偏振成像相机的分析比较。以前的论文基于Salsa Bossa Nova偏振相机研究该相机在遥感领域中确定偏振的操作用途时，没有取得任何效果。本论文的目的是比较两台相机的偏振数据，并从Fluxdata分析一台新获得的偏振相机的性能。Fluxdata和Salsa相机使用两种不同的技术来捕获偏振光。Salsa使用对运动敏感的时间分频旋光计（DoTP），而Fluxdata相机使用振幅分频旋光计（DoAmP），其设计用于在不产生场景移动误差的情况下分割入射光。假设新的Fluxdata相机能够捕获更高质量的偏振数据，这些数据可用于对移动场景中的物体进行分类。研究结果证实了相机能够显示正确的偏振信号，物体的运动不受Fluxdata的影响。Fluxdata显示出更详细的偏振特征，但仍然存在配准误差，这是DoAmP设计的焦平面对准存在的固有问题。

This thesis is an analysis and comparisonof two polarimetric imaging cameras. Previous thesis work utilizing the SalsaBossa Nova polarimetric camera provided null results in the application of thecamera in determining operational uses of polarization in the field of remotesensing. The goal of this thesis is to compare polarimetric data between twocameras and analyze the capabilities of a newly obtained polarimetric camerafrom Fluxdata. The Fluxdata and Salsa cameras utilize two different techniquesto capture polarized light. The Salsa uses a Division of Time Polarimeter(DoTP), which is sensitive to movement, and the Fluxdata camera uses a Divisionof Amplitude Polarimeter (DoAmP), which is designed to split the incoming lightwithout errors from scene movement. The assumption is that the new Fluxdatacamera will be able to capture higher quality polarization data that can beused in classifying objects in moving scenes. The results of the studyconfirmed both camera’s display correct polarization signatures and themovement of objects is not affected by the Fluxdata. The Fluxdata displays moredetailed polarization signatures, but still suffers from registration errorswhich are inherent of the focal plane alignment of the DoAmP design.

1 引言
2 历史回顾
3 相机操作
4 研究方法
5 数据分析
6 结论与研究建议
附录A Fluxdata图像

更多精彩文章请关注公众号：