B站 刘二大人 ,传送门PyTorch深度学习实践——卷积神经网络(高级篇)
首先介绍inception Module
卷积核超参数选择困难,通过inception Module从候选组合里自动找到卷积的最佳组合。
1x1卷积核,不同通道的信息融合。使用1x1卷积核虽然参数量增加了,但是能够显著的降低计算量
代码如下(实现可视化)
import torch
import torch.nn as nn
from torchvision import transforms
from torchvision import datasets
from torch.utils.data import DataLoader
import torch.nn.functional as F
import torch.optim as optim
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
# prepare dataset
batch_size = 64
transform = transforms.Compose([transforms.ToTensor(), transforms.Normalize((0.1307,), (0.3081,))]) # 归一化,均值和方差
train_dataset = datasets.MNIST(root='../mnist_dataset/mnist_dataset/', train=True, download=True, transform=transform)
train_loader = DataLoader(train_dataset, shuffle=True, batch_size=batch_size)
# 同样的方式加载一下测试集
test_dataset = datasets.MNIST(root='../mnist_dataset/mnist_dataset/', train=False, download=True, transform=transform)
test_loader = DataLoader(test_dataset, shuffle=False, batch_size=batch_size)
# design model using class
class InceptionA(nn.Module):
def __init__(self, in_channels):
super(InceptionA, self).__init__()
self.branch1x1 = nn.Conv2d(in_channels, 16, kernel_size=1)
self.branch5x5_1 = nn.Conv2d(in_channels, 16, kernel_size=1)
self.branch5x5_2 = nn.Conv2d(16, 24, kernel_size=5, padding=2)
self.branch3x3_1 = nn.Conv2d(in_channels, 16, kernel_size=1)
self.branch3x3_2 = nn.Conv2d(16, 24, kernel_size=3, padding=1)
self.branch3x3_3 = nn.Conv2d(24, 24, kernel_size=3, padding=1)
self.branch_pool = nn.Conv2d(in_channels, 24, kernel_size=1)
def forward(self, x):
branch1x1 = self.branch1x1(x)
branch5x5 = self.branch5x5_1(x)
branch5x5 = self.branch5x5_2(branch5x5)
branch3x3 = self.branch3x3_1(x)
branch3x3 = self.branch3x3_2(branch3x3)
branch3x3 = self.branch3x3_3(branch3x3)
branch_pool = F.avg_pool2d(x, kernel_size=3, stride=1, padding=1)
branch_pool = self.branch_pool(branch_pool)
outputs = [branch1x1, branch5x5, branch3x3, branch_pool]
return torch.cat(outputs, dim=1) # b,c,w,h c对应的是dim=1
class Net(nn.Module):
def __init__(self):
super(Net, self).__init__()
self.conv1 = nn.Conv2d(1, 10, kernel_size=5)
self.conv2 = nn.Conv2d(88, 20, kernel_size=5) # 88 = 24x3 + 16
self.incep1 = InceptionA(in_channels=10) # 与conv1 中的10对应
self.incep2 = InceptionA(in_channels=20) # 与conv2 中的20对应
self.mp = nn.MaxPool2d(2)
self.fc = nn.Linear(1408, 10)
def forward(self, x):
in_size = x.size(0)
x = F.relu(self.mp(self.conv1(x)))
x = self.incep1(x)
x = F.relu(self.mp(self.conv2(x)))
x = self.incep2(x)
x = x.view(in_size, -1)
x = self.fc(x)
return x
model = Net()
# 把计算迁移到GPU
device = torch.device("cuda" if torch.cuda.is_available() else "cpu")
model.to(device)
# construct loss and optimizer
criterion = torch.nn.CrossEntropyLoss()
optimizer = optim.SGD(model.parameters(), lr=0.01, momentum=0.5)
# training cycle forward, backward, update
def train(epoch):
running_loss = 0.0
for batch_idx, data in enumerate(train_loader, 0):
inputs, target = data
inputs, target = inputs.to(device), target.to(device)
optimizer.zero_grad()
outputs = model(inputs)
loss = criterion(outputs, target)
loss.backward()
optimizer.step()
running_loss += loss.item()
if batch_idx % 300 == 299:
print('[%d, %5d] loss: %.3f' % (epoch + 1, batch_idx + 1, running_loss / 300))
running_loss = 0.0
def test():
correct = 0
total = 0
with torch.no_grad():
for data in test_loader:
images, labels = data
images, labels = images.to(device), labels.to(device)
outputs = model(images)
_, predicted = torch.max(outputs.data, dim=1)
total += labels.size(0)
correct += (predicted == labels).sum().item()
global result
result = 100 * correct / total
print('accuracy on test set: %d %% ' % result)
if __name__ == '__main__':
result_list = []
epoch_list = []
for epoch in range(10):
train(epoch)
test()
result_list.append(result)
epoch_list.append(epoch)
#if epoch % 10 == 9:
plt.plot(epoch_list, result_list)
plt.xlabel('epoch')
plt.ylabel('cost')
plt.show()
输出结果
[1, 300] loss: 0.816
[1, 600] loss: 0.194
[1, 900] loss: 0.150
accuracy on test set: 96 %
[2, 300] loss: 0.118
[2, 600] loss: 0.096
[2, 900] loss: 0.096
accuracy on test set: 97 %
[3, 300] loss: 0.080
[3, 600] loss: 0.073
[3, 900] loss: 0.075
accuracy on test set: 98 %
[4, 300] loss: 0.068
[4, 600] loss: 0.064
[4, 900] loss: 0.058
accuracy on test set: 98 %
[5, 300] loss: 0.053
[5, 600] loss: 0.057
[5, 900] loss: 0.056
accuracy on test set: 98 %
[6, 300] loss: 0.048
[6, 600] loss: 0.047
[6, 900] loss: 0.053
accuracy on test set: 98 %
[7, 300] loss: 0.046
[7, 600] loss: 0.040
[7, 900] loss: 0.046
accuracy on test set: 98 %
[8, 300] loss: 0.038
[8, 600] loss: 0.042
[8, 900] loss: 0.041
accuracy on test set: 98 %
[9, 300] loss: 0.034
[9, 600] loss: 0.037
[9, 900] loss: 0.040
accuracy on test set: 98 %
[10, 300] loss: 0.036
[10, 600] loss: 0.034
[10, 900] loss: 0.032
accuracy on test set: 98 %