mc官方认证服务器_有关MC *认证的更多信息*

mc官方认证服务器

So I guess the point of all this rambling is that it is easy for those of us who are authors, speakers, etc., and who have years of experience under our belts to make light of the utility of certifications, and to be annoyed when we see the those 3- and 4-letter marks of the certified. But I try hard not to forget that absent certification, it's entirely possible that I would still be building scenery somewhere, and still struggling to pay my bills.[Andrew Duthie]

因此，我想所有这些杂乱无章的要点是，对于我们这些作家，演讲者等，并且拥有多年经验的人来说，使用认证的实用性很容易，并且当他们感到烦恼时我们看到了认证的3个字母和4个字母的标记。 但是我尽力不忘记缺少认证，我很有可能仍然会在某个地方营造风景，并且仍在努力支付账单。[安德鲁·杜西( Andrew Duthie) ]

This whole certification thing sure is an interesting discussion.  I seem to remember having the same talks a few years back when the MCSD came out.  I still stand by my previous (last week) opinion on certification.  If Mort wants a certification, more power to Mort. But, when it comes time to choose the team, Mort had better have a resume like Elvis or Einstein. 

整个认证过程肯定是一个有趣的讨论。 我似乎记得几年前MCSD出台时也有过同样的谈话。 我仍然坚持以前(上周)关于认证的意见。 如果Mort需要认证，则Mort拥有更大的权力。 但是，在选择球队时，莫特最好有像猫王或爱因斯坦这样的简历。

I hear what Andrew is saying, there but for the grace go I.  I got the MCP in '93 or '94 and felt pretty darn good about it.  But did it kick of the whole thing for me?  I think it was passion for technology that did it.  It was the TI/89A and the Apple II. It was the Commodore PET and the TRS(Trash)-80.  It was caring so much about an elegant solution that I'd stay up nights refactoring perfectly operational big ball of mud code.

我听到了安德鲁所说的话，但我还是为了宽限期而去。我在93或94年获得了MCP，对此感到非常不愉快。 但是，这对我有帮助吗？ 我认为这是对技术的热情。 它是TI / 89A和Apple II。 它是准将PET和TRS(垃圾)-80。 它非常关心一个优雅的解决方案，以至于我彻夜难眠地重构完美运行的大代码泥泞球。

I'm not trying to down play the paper - as Rebecca Dias says, documents are central to life.  Why else would I be on my 11th year of my Software Engineering degree? (Reminder: June 6th is Graduation!)  Something in myself says that THAT is a piece of paper I really want to have.  I wouldn't mind it if Mort had a B.S. or M.S. and a few MC*.*s, as well as some experience under his belt, not to mention the ability to grok and ephiphanize.

我并不是想淡化纸张-正如丽贝卡·迪亚斯(Rebecca Dias)所说，文件对于生活至关重要。 为什么我还要进入软件工程专业的11年级？ (提醒：6月6日是毕业！)我自己说我真的很想拿那张纸。 我不会介意，如果莫特有本科或硕士和几个MC *。* S，以及一些经验，在他的皮带，更不用说能力神交和ephiphanize 。

I'm getting off on a rant here, but here's the real rub - there are a lot of people in the technology industry who got in for the quick dot-com-dollar.  Certainly the industry can't support this many people can we?  Certification may be a great way to stay in the game, but, I mean, there's the whole competence issue to deal with.  80% of the world business logic runs in Microsoft Excel for Pete's Sake.  .NET is fantastic, but Visual Studio drag and drop can make bad programmers WORSE faster than ever.  I know lots of people who are certified that I woudn't hire. 

我在这里大声疾呼，但这才是真正的难题-科技行业的很多人都加入了快速的点对点美元制。 当然，行业不能支持这么多人吗？ 认证可能是留在游戏中的好方法，但是，我的意思是，还有整个能力问题要处理。 世界上80％的业务逻辑都在Microsoft Excel中为Pete's Sake运行。 .NET太棒了，但是Visual Studio的拖放可以使糟糕的程序员WORSE变得比以往更快。 我知道很多人都证明我不会雇用。

A great example of why I take certification with a grain of salt is a friend at work who is a biscuit away from his PhD...in History - and, he's a fantastic, brilliant, talented, completely uncertified engineer.  And darnit if he doesn't ship good code to production.

一个为什么我要获得一粒盐的证书的一个很好的例子是一个工作中的朋友，与他的历史学博士学位背道而驰-而且，他是一位出色，出色，才华横溢，完全未经认证的工程师。 如果他没有将好的代码发布到生产环境，那就行了。

Bottom line, certification, degrees, experience, are each just checkboxs on a long list of qualifications.  Full stop.

底线，证书，学位，经验仅是一长串资格证书上的复选框。 句号

private short mytwocents[2];Scott

私人短mytwocents [2];斯科特

翻译自: https://www.hanselman.com/blog/more-talk-about-certification-from-an-mc

mc官方认证服务器