JSON和TLV，两种编解码的比较

我这的测试用例是，定义了一个简单的正方体（Cube）对象，它还有个颜色（Color）属性对象。
TLV的编解码是我们自己写的；JSON编解码，使用的是阿里巴巴的fastjson-1.1.39.jar。

	public static class Color {
		@TLV(tag = 1)
		long value; // 值
		@TLV(tag = 2)
		String name; // 名称
		// setter and getter
		@Override
		public String toString() {
			return "Color [value=" + value + ", name=" + name + "]";
		}
	}

	public static class Cube {
		@TLV(tag = 1)
		int id; // 编号
		@TLV(tag = 2)
		Long size; // 大小
		@TLV(tag = 3)
		String name; // 名称
		@TLV(tag = 4)
		Color color;
		// setter and getter
		@Override
		public String toString() {
			return "Cube [id=" + id + ", size=" + size + ", name=" + name
					+ ", color=" + color + "]";
		}
	}
  
	public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
			Color color = new Color();
			color.setValue(0xFFFF);
			color.setName("白色");
			Cube cube = new Cube();
			cube.setId(1);
			cube.setSize(6L);
			cube.setName("正方体");
			cube.setColor(color);
			//下面用两种方法测试  
			boolean test = true;
			final long CYCEL_NUM = 1;
			System.out.println(cube);
			System.out.println("CYCEL_NUM:" + CYCEL_NUM);
			if (test) { // TLV编解码
				System.out.println("-----TLV-----");
				byte[] bytes = null;
				long time1 = (new Date()).getTime();
				for (int i = 0; i < CYCEL_NUM; i++) {
					bytes = CodecUtil.encode(cube);
				}
				long time2 = (new Date()).getTime();
				System.out.println("encode time:" + (time2 - time1));
				System.out.println("length:" + bytes.length);
				Cube cb = null;
				long time3 = (new Date()).getTime();
				for (int i = 0; i < CYCEL_NUM; i++) {
					cb = CodecUtil.decode(bytes, Cube.class);
				}
				long time4 = (new Date()).getTime();
				System.out.println("decode time:" + (time4 - time3));
				System.out.println(cb);
			}
			if (test) { // JSON编解码
				System.out.println("-----JSON-----");
				String jsonString = null;
				long time1 = (new Date()).getTime();
				for (int i = 0; i < CYCEL_NUM; i++) {
					jsonString = JSON.toJSONString(cube);
				}
				long time2 = (new Date()).getTime();
				System.out.println("encode time:" + (time2 - time1));
				System.out.println("length:" + jsonString.length() + ",data:\n"
						+ jsonString);
				Cube cb = null;
				long time3 = (new Date()).getTime();
				for (int i = 0; i < CYCEL_NUM; i++) {
					cb = JSON.parseObject(jsonString, Cube.class);
				}
				long time4 = (new Date()).getTime();
				System.out.println("decode time:" + (time4 - time3));
				System.out.println(cb);
			}
		}

执行结果为：TLV和JSON的编码 长度几乎相当（ 71和 66）；TLV是JSON的 编码速度的 5倍， 解码速度的 30倍。

Cube [id=1, size=6, name=正方体, color=Color [value=65535, name=白色]]
CYCEL_NUM:1
-----TLV-----
encode time:27
length:71
decode time:1
Cube [id=1, size=6, name=正方体, color=Color [value=65535, name=白色]]
-----JSON-----
encode time:146
length:66,data:
{"color":{"name":"白色","value":65535},"id":1,"name":"正方体","size":6}
decode time:34
Cube [id=1, size=6, name=正方体, color=Color [value=65535, name=白色]]

如果将循环次数（CYCEL_NUM）加大到1000，JSON的编解码速度几乎能赶上TLV（同一个数量级）了。

Cube [id=1, size=6, name=正方体, color=Color [value=65535, name=白色]]
CYCEL_NUM:1000
-----TLV-----
encode time:122
length:71
decode time:89
Cube [id=1, size=6, name=正方体, color=Color [value=65535, name=白色]]
-----JSON-----
encode time:169
length:66,data:
{"color":{"name":"白色","value":65535},"id":1,"name":"正方体","size":6}
decode time:58
Cube [id=1, size=6, name=正方体, color=Color [value=65535, name=白色]]

如果将循环次数（CYCEL_NUM加大到1000000，JSON的编解码速度远远超过TLV（8倍）了。

Cube [id=1, size=6, name=正方体, color=Color [value=65535, name=白色]]
CYCEL_NUM:1000000
-----TLV-----
encode time:5538
length:71
decode time:4877
Cube [id=1, size=6, name=正方体, color=Color [value=65535, name=白色]]
-----JSON-----
encode time:756
length:66,data:
{"color":{"name":"白色","value":65535},"id":1,"name":"正方体","size":6}
decode time:677
Cube [id=1, size=6, name=正方体, color=Color [value=65535, name=白色]]

由此可见，FASTJSON在缓存方面，做的挺不错啊！