CVPR2022人脸识别Partial FC论文及代码学习笔记

论文链接：https://openaccess.thecvf.com/content/CVPR2022/papers/An_Killing_Two_Birds_With_One_Stone_Efficient_and_Robust_Training_CVPR_2022_paper.pdf

代码链接：insightface/recognition/arcface_torch at master · deepinsight/insightface · GitHub

背景

使用基于百万规模的数据集和基于margin的softmax损失函数来学习区分性的embeddings是当前人脸识别的SOTA方法。然而，全连接层的内存和计算成本随着训练集中ID数量的增加而线性增加。此外，大规模训练数据存在类间冲突（同一个人被分成不同ID）和长尾分布的问题。

传统FC

将传统的FC层应用在大规模的数据集上时，存在以下缺陷：

1、gradient confusion under interclass conflict

WebFace42M里有很多不同类别对之间的余弦相似度大于0.4，这表明类间冲突仍然存在于这些清洗过的数据集中。直接优化的话会导致gradient confusion（同一个人的特征非常相似却要掰成两个ID）

2、centers of tail classes undergo too many passive updates

每个iteration都优化图片数量很少的id，可能会导致负优化

3、the storage and calculation of the FC layer can easily exceed current GPU capabilities

PartialFC

在训练期间仍然维护所有类别中心，但只随机采样一小部分负类别中心来计算基于margin的softmax损失，而不是在每次迭代中使用所有负类别中心。更具体地说，首先从每个GPU收集embeddings和标签，然后将组合的特征和标签分布到所有GPU。为了平衡每个GPU的内存使用和计算成本，为每个GPU设置了一个内存缓冲区（下面代码中的perm，大小为self.sample_rate * self.num_local）。内存缓冲区的大小由类别总数和负类别中心的采样率决定。在每个GPU上，首先通过标签选择正类中心并放入缓冲区，然后随机选择一小部分负类中心（负类中心的数量为self.sample_rate * self.num_local-positive.shape[0]）填充缓冲区的其余部分，

def sample(self, labels, index_positive):
    """
    This functions will change the value of labels
    Parameters:
    -----------
    labels: torch.Tensor
        pass
    index_positive: torch.Tensor
        pass
    optimizer: torch.optim.Optimizer
        pass
    """
    with torch.no_grad():
        positive = torch.unique(labels[index_positive], sorted=True).cuda()
        if self.num_sample - positive.size(0) >= 0:
            perm = torch.rand(size=[self.num_local]).cuda()
            perm[positive] = 2.0
            index = torch.topk(perm, k=self.num_sample)[1].cuda()
            index = index.sort()[0].cuda()
        else:
            index = positive
        self.weight_index = index

        labels[index_positive] = torch.searchsorted(index, labels[index_positive])

    return self.weight[self.weight_index]

随后，使用选出的样本中心去与特征相乘并计算基于margin的softmax损失。

PFC在DDP框架下的流程图如下图所示，

整体代码如下，

class PartialFC_V2(torch.nn.Module):
    """
    https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.15565
    A distributed sparsely updating variant of the FC layer, named Partial FC (PFC).
    When sample rate less than 1, in each iteration, positive class centers and a random subset of
    negative class centers are selected to compute the margin-based softmax loss, all class
    centers are still maintained throughout the whole training process, but only a subset is
    selected and updated in each iteration.
    .. note::
        When sample rate equal to 1, Partial FC is equal to model parallelism(default sample rate is 1).
    Example:
    --------
    >>> module_pfc = PartialFC(embedding_size=512, num_classes=8000000, sample_rate=0.2)
    >>> for img, labels in data_loader:
    >>>     embeddings = net(img)
    >>>     loss = module_pfc(embeddings, labels)
    >>>     loss.backward()
    >>>     optimizer.step()
    """
    _version = 2

    def __init__(
        self,
        margin_loss: Callable,
        embedding_size: int,
        num_classes: int,
        sample_rate: float = 1.0,
        fp16: bool = False,
    ):
        """
        Paramenters:
        -----------
        embedding_size: int
            The dimension of embedding, required
        num_classes: int
            Total number of classes, required
        sample_rate: float
            The rate of negative centers participating in the calculation, default is 1.0.
        """
        super(PartialFC_V2, self).__init__()
        assert (
            distributed.is_initialized()
        ), "must initialize distributed before create this"
        self.rank = distributed.get_rank()
        self.world_size = distributed.get_world_size()

        self.dist_cross_entropy = DistCrossEntropy()
        self.embedding_size = embedding_size
        self.sample_rate: float = sample_rate
        self.fp16 = fp16
        self.num_local: int = num_classes // self.world_size + int(
            self.rank < num_classes % self.world_size
        )
        self.class_start: int = num_classes // self.world_size * self.rank + min(
            self.rank, num_classes % self.world_size
        )
        self.num_sample: int = int(self.sample_rate * self.num_local)
        self.last_batch_size: int = 0

        self.is_updated: bool = True
        self.init_weight_update: bool = True
        self.weight = torch.nn.Parameter(torch.normal(0, 0.01, (self.num_local, embedding_size)))

        # margin_loss
        if isinstance(margin_loss, Callable):
            self.margin_softmax = margin_loss
        else:
            raise

    def sample(self, labels, index_positive):
        """
            This functions will change the value of labels
            Parameters:
            -----------
            labels: torch.Tensor
                pass
            index_positive: torch.Tensor
                pass
            optimizer: torch.optim.Optimizer
                pass
        """
        with torch.no_grad():
            positive = torch.unique(labels[index_positive], sorted=True).cuda()
            if self.num_sample - positive.size(0) >= 0:
                perm = torch.rand(size=[self.num_local]).cuda()
                perm[positive] = 2.0
                index = torch.topk(perm, k=self.num_sample)[1].cuda()
                index = index.sort()[0].cuda()
            else:
                index = positive
            self.weight_index = index

            labels[index_positive] = torch.searchsorted(index, labels[index_positive])

        return self.weight[self.weight_index]

    def forward(
        self,
        local_embeddings: torch.Tensor,
        local_labels: torch.Tensor,
    ):
        """
        Parameters:
        ----------
        local_embeddings: torch.Tensor
            feature embeddings on each GPU(Rank).
        local_labels: torch.Tensor
            labels on each GPU(Rank).
        Returns:
        -------
        loss: torch.Tensor
            pass
        """
        local_labels.squeeze_()
        local_labels = local_labels.long()

        batch_size = local_embeddings.size(0)
        if self.last_batch_size == 0:
            self.last_batch_size = batch_size
        assert self.last_batch_size == batch_size, (
            f"last batch size do not equal current batch size: {self.last_batch_size} vs {batch_size}")

        _gather_embeddings = [
            torch.zeros((batch_size, self.embedding_size)).cuda()
            for _ in range(self.world_size)
        ]
        _gather_labels = [
            torch.zeros(batch_size).long().cuda() for _ in range(self.world_size)
        ]
        _list_embeddings = AllGather(local_embeddings, *_gather_embeddings)
        distributed.all_gather(_gather_labels, local_labels)

        embeddings = torch.cat(_list_embeddings)
        labels = torch.cat(_gather_labels)
        
        ## 选出落在本进程对应的类别范围内的数据
        labels = labels.view(-1, 1)
        index_positive = (self.class_start <= labels) & (
            labels < self.class_start + self.num_local
        )
        ## 标签不在本类别段的, 将其类别标签设为-1
        labels[~index_positive] = -1
        ## 将类别ID平移到原点（因为不同进程都会初始化对应的self.weight, 若不平移回去, 则label与self.weight中的index会对应不上）
        labels[index_positive] -= self.class_start

        if self.sample_rate < 1:
            weight = self.sample(labels, index_positive)
        else:
            weight = self.weight

        with torch.cuda.amp.autocast(self.fp16):
            norm_embeddings = normalize(embeddings)
            norm_weight_activated = normalize(weight)
            logits = linear(norm_embeddings, norm_weight_activated)
        if self.fp16:
            logits = logits.float()
        logits = logits.clamp(-1, 1)

        logits = self.margin_softmax(logits, labels)
        loss = self.dist_cross_entropy(logits, labels)
        return loss

实验结果

将PFC替换掉传统FC后，模型在WebFace（包括4m、12m、42m）上的性能会有所提升，

 消融实验的结果如下，

与SOTA方法的性能对比如下， 

结论与讨论

结论

作者提出了一种用于在大规模数据集上训练人脸识别模型的方法——Partial FC (PFC)。在PFC的每次迭代中，仅选择一小部分类别中心来计算基于边际的softmax损失，这样可以显著减少类间冲突的概率、尾类中心的被动更新频率以及计算需求。通过广泛的实验，作者验证了所提出的PFC的有效性、鲁棒性和高效性。

局限性

尽管在WebFace上训练的PFC模型在高质量测试集上取得了不错的结果，但在人脸分辨率较低或低光照条件下拍摄的人脸上，PFC模型的表现可能较差。