美赛数模论文之优缺点写作

美赛数模论文之优缺点写作

Evaluations of solutions

Strengths

  • Our main model's strength is its enormous edibility. For instance,……..Including all these factors into a single, robust framework, our model enables.
  • We developed a theoretical line formation model which agrees without rough data. Our computer model agrees with both despite working on different principles, implying it behaves as we want.
  • This allows us to make substantive conclusions about
  • Finally, our model is strong because of
  • The Monte Carlo simulation has been perfectly used in our models, and the simulationresults are consistent with the reality.
  • We introduced …… in order to improve the exchange quality. The chain rules can also modified in a degree.
  • The models used in our paper is promotional, in view of different consideration,
  • We can modify our models conveniently.
  • The model is independent of the site simulated( )…
  • the( )model is .intuitive
  • the algorithm is efficient ::
  • A corresponding strength of our model is that it would be relatively easy to include a parameter for probability of ……
  • Our model is particularly appropriate for simulation of ……, a problem that naturally lends itself to such discrete modeling.
  • The fundamental strengths of our model are…
  • The model is independent of…
  • Processor-based model has few input parameters, leading to good robustness and sensitivity.
  • Uses a variety of modeling techniques in an integrated, holistic model.
  • Our model effectivelyachieved all of the goals we set initially. It was fast and could handle large quantities of data, but also had the flexibility we desired. Though we did not test all possibilities, we showed that our model optimizes state districts for any of a number of variables. If we had chosen to input income, poverty, crime or education data into our interest function, we could have produced high-quality results with virtually no added difficulty. As well, our method was robust.
  • Our main model's strength is its enormous flexibility. For instance
  • This allows us to make substantive conclusions about policy issues, even without extensive data sets. By varying parameters, allocation rules, and our program's objective function——all quite feasible within the structure——we can examine the guts of policymaking: the ethical principles underlying a policy, the implementation rules designed to fulfill them, and the sometimes nebulous numbers that govern the results.
  • Finally, our model is strong because of its discrete setup.
  • The fundamental strengths of our model are its robustness and flexibility. All of the data is fully parameterized, so the model can be applied to……

Weaknesses

  • Some special data can't be found, and it makes that we have to do some proper assumption before the solution of our models. A more abundant data resource can guarantee a better result in our models. Current line length is not taken into account by the line formation model. In real life……
  • Weaknesses of the model included assumptions made for simplicity that likely do not hold. For instance, in most runs of our model on(sides……), cases (impact/conclusion) to…… This feature is likely a result of our assumption that /The primary weakness of this model is the( ),    It should be possible to eliminate this, another weakness that could be corrected with more analysis is ( )`
  • The primary weakness of this model is the…

Another weakness that could be corrected with more analysis is …

  • Parameters have to be derived from physical occurrences.
  • The other primary weakness of our model is our lack of metrics for comparison.
  • Although we list the model's comprehensive, discrete simulation as a strength, it is
  • (Paradoxically) also the most notable weakness. Our results lack clear….Second ,our model demands great attention to….While its general structure and methodology are valid, the specific figures embedded in its code are not airtight.
  • Although we list the model's comprehensive, …… as a strength, it is (paradoxically) also the most notable weakness. Our results lack clear illustrative power; data manipulated through a computer program cannot achieve the same effect as ……
  • Indeed, there is a fundamental tradeoff here between realism and elegance, and our model arguably veers toward over realism.
  • 7
    点赞
  • 38
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论
Our planet is getting thirstier and thirstier. Water scarcity has become an increasingly hard but urgent problem. To make contributions to solve the water problems, we proposed a metric model to identify the ability of each country to manage water scarcity, and offered solutions to a country considered water over-loaded. First we developed our metric, Total Scarcity Metric, and divided it into Physical Scarcity Metric (affected by environmental factors and population) and Economic Scarcity Metric (affected by social factors other than population) by the two causes of water scarcity. The detailed factors were selected to make a difference. We made some adjustments to an indicator we found widely-used in the literatures, and determine Physical Scarcity Metric based on it. For Economic Scarcity Metric, we built a factor model with its weight calculated by Grey Relational Analysis. To combine them, we introduced a parameter  revealing the relative emphasis between physical scarcity and economic scarcity of each country. Its value varies by countries, so it’s more proper to discuss it in the country level. Then we used data from 83 countries to verify our model, and found a similar water scarcity distribution compared to UN’s “World Scarcity Map”. By providing sensitivity analysis on  ,we indicated the importance of its selection for each country. Based on that result, we chose Pakistan for further analysis. First we discussed the possible factors accounting for its current water situation, including 2 environmental factors and 5 social factors. We made it clear how and what kind of scarcity they affect. To forecast the water situation in 2030 by our metric, we determined the predicted value of influential factors by Grey Forecasting Model and Regression Analysis with little error. We found Pakistan less susceptible to economic scarcity but more to physical scarcity at that time. Its total water scarcity will be alleviated. Next, we devised an intervention plan to improve the ability of Pakistan to deal with its water scarcity. The plan is made up of physical scarcity plan and economic scarcity plan. Considering the impact of each policy, we analyzed the overall strengths and weaknesses in a larger context. To see how our plan performs, we ran our model again under some hypothesized settings. Although Pakistan performed better with our plan and its economic scarcity can be alleviated, it will still face water scarcity, especially physical water scarcity. In conclusion, Pakistan still has a long way to go.
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值