https://id.tudou.com/i/UNDA3OTMyMjUyOA==/playlists?spm=a2hzp.8244740.0.0
There are videos about the principle and characteristic of CCD and CMOS in ths website from the company Exachroma Technology Limited in which the lecture is clear enough for me.like it.As is shown in the table below.
The above video is about CCD and CMOS, too.It is more about the different image result for rotation image caused by rolling shutter.
https://v.youku.com/v_show/id_XOTQ5MzQ1NTA0.html?spm=a2h0j.11185381.listitem_page1.5!8~A
This is a video about the tralling effect of them two showing that CMOS is much better.
monolitic/hybrizedvis | CCD | CMOS |
name | charged coupled device | complimentary metal-oxide semi |
principle | serial | parallel |
virtues | low noise (special tdi for space imc) | low power fast easy to fabricate |
vices | high power slow no standard fabrication | high noise
|
application | space vision | cllphone |
http://www.teledynedalsa.com/en/learn/knowledge-center/ccd-vs-cmos/
There is detailed discription about them two in many application areas, which is
translated in the below wedsite:
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_56b3ca3c0102uzbn.html
extracted:
在多数可见光成像应用中,CMOS面阵和线阵成像器优于CCD成像器。
然而,在高速低照明应用中,CCD时间延迟积分成像器优于CMOS时间延迟积分成像器。
在近红外成像方面, CCD面阵和线阵成像器是更好的选择。
在紫外成像中,考虑到全局快照要求,能否实施背面减薄表面处理是关键。
此外,低噪声要求也是一个因素。在这一方面,因为拥有高读出速度,CMOS的优势比CCD更为明显。
总而言之,价格和性能之间的权衡都会影响对CCD或是CMOS的评定,具体取决于杠杆、规模和供应安全性。