更便捷的画决策分支图的工具_做出更好决策的3个要素

更便捷的画决策分支图的工具

Have you ever wondered:

您是否曾经想过：

• How did Google dominate 92.1% of the search engine market share?

  Google如何占领搜索引擎92.1％的市场份额？

• How did Facebook achieve 74.1% of social media market share?

  Facebook如何取得社交媒体市场份额的74.1％ ？

• How did Microsoft win over 77.7% of the Desktop OS market share?

  Microsoft如何赢得超过77.7％的桌面操作系统市场份额？

Aside from great vision, they all decided on how they do things, leading them to their triumph. Google decided to focus its search engine to provide better user experience, instead of monetization. Learning from the early adopters, Facebook decided to plan its growth, time its entry, and manage its public relation wisely. Microsoft decided to build Windows with compatibility in mind, reducing future issues so they can innovate even more.

除了有远见，他们都决定如何做事，带领他们走向胜利。 Google决定将重点放在搜索引擎上，以提供更好的用户体验，而不是通过获利 。 向早期采用者学习，Facebook决定计划其发展，安排其进入时间并明智地管理其公共关系 。 微软决定在构建Windows时考虑到兼容性 ，以减少将来出现的问题，以便他们可以进行更多创新。

They all made great decisions, bet on it — and won.

他们都做出了伟大的决定，下了赌注，并且赢了。

As one who’s in the data science field, being data-driven is a must. Deciding our actions based on data is a normal thing to do. It’s in the job description after all. Yet, my mentor once said, “be more than a data scientist”. I figured out what it means later on. Not all problems can be solved using data. Maybe it can, but is it the best approach?

作为数据科学领域的一员，必须以数据驱动。 根据数据确定我们的行动是正常的事情。 毕竟它在职位描述中。 但是，我的导师曾经说过，“不仅仅是一名数据科学家”。 后来我弄清楚了这是什么意思。 使用数据并不能解决所有问题。 也许可以，但这是最好的方法吗？

Other than data science and analytics, 2 more es