找了很多篇，这个博主写的很详细
一开始，还是导入库：
-
import numpy
as np
-
import pandas
as pd
-
import matplotlib.pyplot
as plt
-
-
data = pd.read_csv(
'creditcard.csv')
-
#data.head(10)
-
print (data.shape)
我们发现，最后一列"Class"要么是 0 ，要么是 1，而且是 0 的样本很多，1 的样本很少。这也符合正常情况：利用信用卡欺诈的情况毕竟是少数，大多数人都是守法的公民。由于样本太多了，我们不可能去数 0 和 1 的个数到底是多少。因此，需要做一下统计：
-
count_class = pd.value_counts(data[
'Class'],sort =
True).sort_index()
-
print (count_class)
输出结果为：
0 284315
1 492
Name: Class, dtype: int64
结果也显示了，0的个数远远多于1的个数。那么，这样就会使正负样本的个数严重失衡。为了解决这个问题，我们需要针对样本不均衡，提出两种解决方案：过采样和下采样。
在对样本处理之前，我们需要对样本中的数据先进行处理。我们发现，有一列为 Time ，这一列显然与咱们的训练结果没有直接或间接关系，因此需要把这一列去掉。我们还发现，在 v1 ~v28特征中，取值范围大致在 -1 ~ +1 之间，而Amount 这一类数值非常大，如果我们不对这一列进行处理，这一列对结果的影响，可能非常巨大。因此，要对这一列做标准化：使均值为0，方差为1。 此部分代码如下：
-
from sklearn.preprocessing
import StandardScaler
#导入数据预处理模块
-
data[
'normAmount'] = StandardScaler().fit_transform(data[
'Amount'].values.reshape(
-1,
1))
# -1表示系统自动计算得到的行，1表示1列
-
data = data.drop([
'Time',
'Amount'],axis =
1)
# 删除两列，axis =1表示按照列删除，即删除特征。而axis=0是按行删除，是删除样本
-
#print (data.head(3))
-
#print (data['normAmount'])
解决样本不均衡：两种方法可以采用——过采样和下采样。过采样是对少的样本（此例中是类别为 1 的样本）再多生成些，使 类别为 1 的样本和 0 的样本一样多。而下采样是指，随机选取类别为 0 的样本，是类别为 0 的样本和类别为 1 的样本一样少。下采样的代码如下：
-
X = data.ix[:,data.columns !=
'Class']
#ix 是通过行号和行标签进行取值
-
y = data.ix[:,data.columns ==
'Class']
# y 为标签，即类别
-
number_records_fraud = len(data[data.Class==
1])
#统计异常值的个数
-
#print (number_records_fraud) # 492 个
-
#print (data[data.Class == 1].index)
-
fraud_indices = np.array(data[data.Class ==
1].index)
#统计欺诈样本的下标，并变成矩阵的格式
-
#print (fraud_indices)
-
normal_indices = data[data.Class ==
0].index
# 记录正常值的索引
-
random_normal_indices =np.random.choice(normal_indices,number_records_fraud,replace =
False)
# 从正常值的索引中，选择和异常值相等个数的样本
-
random_normal_indices = np.array(random_normal_indices)
-
#print (len(random_normal_indices)) #492 个
-
-
under_sample_indices = np.concatenate([fraud_indices,random_normal_indices])
# 将正负样本的索引进行组合
-
#print (under_sample_indices) # 984个
-
under_sample_data = data.iloc[under_sample_indices,:]
# 按照索引进行取值
-
X_undersample = under_sample_data.iloc[:,under_sample_data.columns !=
'Class']
#下采样后的训练集
-
y_undersample = under_sample_data.iloc[:,under_sample_data.columns ==
'Class']
#下采样后的标签
-
-
print (len(under_sample_data[under_sample_data.Class==
1])/len(under_sample_data))
# 正负样本的比例都是 0.5
下一步：交叉验证。交叉验证可以辅助调参，使模型的评估效果更好。举个例子，对于一个数据集，我们需要拿出一部分作为训练集（比如 80%），计算我们需要的参数。需要拿出剩下的样本，作为测试集，评估我们的模型的好坏。但是，对于训练集，我们也并不是一股脑地拿去训练。比如把训练集又分成三部分：1,2,3.第 1 部分和第 2 部分作为训练集，第 3 部分作为验证集。然后，再把第 2 部分和第 3 部分作为训练集，第 1 部分作为验证集，然后，再把第 1部分和第 3 部分作为训练集，第 2 部分作为验证集。
-
from sklearn.cross_validation
import train_test_split
# 导入交叉验证模块的数据切分
-
X_train,X_test,y_train,y_test = train_test_split(X,y,test_size =
0.3,random_state =
0)
# 返回 4 个值
-
#print (len(X_train)+len(X_test))
-
#print (len(X))
-
-
X_undersample_train,X_undersample_test,y_undersample_train,y_undersample_train = train_test_split(X_undersample,y_undersample,test_size =
0.3,random_state =
0)
-
print (len(X_undersample_train)+len(X_undersample_test))
-
print (len(X_undersample))
我们需要注意，对数据进行切分，既要对原始数据进行一定比例的切分，测试时能用到；又要对下采样后的样本进行切分，训练的时候用。而且，切分之前，每次都要进行洗牌。
下一步：模型评估。利用交叉验证，选择较好的参数
-
#Recall = TP/(TP+FN)
-
from sklearn.linear_model
import LogisticRegression
#
-
from sklearn.cross_validation
import KFold, cross_val_score
#
-
from sklearn.metrics
import confusion_matrix,recall_score,classification_report
#
先说一个召回率 Recall，这个recall 是需要依据问题本身的含义的，比如，本例中让预测异常值，假设有100个样本，95个正常，5个异常。实际中，对于异常值，预测出来4个，所以，精度就是 80%。也就是说，我需要召回 5 个，实际召回 4 个。
引入四个小定义：TP、TN、FP、FN。
TP,即 True Positive ，判断成了正例，判断正确；把正例判断为正例了
TN,即 True negative, 判断成了负例，判断正确，这叫去伪；把负例判断为负例了
FP，即False Positive ,判断成了正例，但是判断错了，也就是把负例判断为正例了
FN ,即False negative ，判断成了负例，但是判断错了，也就是把正例判断为负例了
正则化惩罚项：为了提高模型的泛化能力，需要加了诸如 L1 、L2惩罚项一类的东西，对于这一部分内容，请参见我以前的博客。
-
def printing_Kfold_scores(x_train_data,y_train_data):
-
fold = KFold(len(y_train_data),
5,shuffle=
False)
-
c_param_range = [
0.01,
0.1,
1,
10,
100]
# 惩罚力度参数
-
results_table = pd.DataFrame(index = range(len(c_param_range),
2),columns = [
'C_parameter',
'Mean recall score'])
-
results_table[
'C_parameter'] = c_param_range
-
-
# k折交叉验证有两个；列表: train_indices = indices[0], test_indices = indices[1]
-
j =
0
-
for c_param
in c_param_range:
#
-
print(
'------------------------------------------')
-
print(
'C parameter:',c_param)
-
print(
'-------------------------------------------')
-
print(
'')
-
-
recall_accs = []
-
-
for iteration, indices
in enumerate(fold,start=
1):
#循环进行交叉验证
-
-
# Call the logistic regression model with a certain C parameter
-
lr = LogisticRegression(C = c_param, penalty =
'l1')
#实例化逻辑回归模型，L1 正则化
-
-
# Use the training data to fit the model. In this case, we use the portion of the fold to train the model
-
# with indices[0]. We then predict on the portion assigned as the 'test cross validation' with indices[1]
-
lr.fit(x_train_data.iloc[indices[
0],:],y_train_data.iloc[indices[
0],:].values.ravel())
# 套路：使训练模型fit模型
-
-
# Predict values using the test indices in the training data
-
y_pred_undersample = lr.predict(x_train_data.iloc[indices[
1],:].values)
# 利用交叉验证进行预测
-
-
# Calculate the recall score and append it to a list for recall scores representing the current c_parameter
-
recall_acc = recall_score(y_train_data.iloc[indices[
1],:].values,y_pred_undersample)
#评估预测结果
-
recall_accs.append(recall_acc)
-
print(
'Iteration ', iteration,
': recall score = ', recall_acc)
-
-
# The mean value of those recall scores is the metric we want to save and get hold of.
-
results_table.ix[j,
'Mean recall score'] = np.mean(recall_accs)
-
j +=
1
-
print(
'')
-
print(
'Mean recall score ', np.mean(recall_accs))
-
print(
'')
-
-
best_c = results_table.loc[results_table[
'Mean recall score'].idxmax()][
'C_parameter']
-
-
# Finally, we can check which C parameter is the best amongst the chosen.
-
print(
'*********************************************************************************')
-
print(
'Best model to choose from cross validation is with C parameter = ', best_c)
-
print(
'*********************************************************************************')
-
-
return best_c
运行：
best_c = printing_Kfold_scores(X_train_undersample,y_train_undersample)
上面程序中，我们选择进行 5 折的交叉验证，对应地选择了5个惩罚力度参数：0.01,0.1,1,10,100。不同的惩罚力度参数，得到的 Recall 是不一样的。
C parameter: 0.01
-------------------------------------------
Iteration 1 : recall score = 0.958904109589
Iteration 2 : recall score = 0.917808219178
Iteration 3 : recall score = 1.0
Iteration 4 : recall score = 0.972972972973
Iteration 5 : recall score = 0.954545454545
Mean recall score 0.960846151257
-------------------------------------------
C parameter: 0.1
-------------------------------------------
Iteration 1 : recall score = 0.835616438356
Iteration 2 : recall score = 0.86301369863
Iteration 3 : recall score = 0.915254237288
Iteration 4 : recall score = 0.932432432432
Iteration 5 : recall score = 0.878787878788
Mean recall score 0.885020937099
-------------------------------------------
C parameter: 1
-------------------------------------------
Iteration 1 : recall score = 0.835616438356
Iteration 2 : recall score = 0.86301369863
Iteration 3 : recall score = 0.966101694915
Iteration 4 : recall score = 0.945945945946
Iteration 5 : recall score = 0.893939393939
Mean recall score 0.900923434357
-------------------------------------------
C parameter: 10
-------------------------------------------
Iteration 1 : recall score = 0.849315068493
Iteration 2 : recall score = 0.86301369863
Iteration 3 : recall score = 0.966101694915
Iteration 4 : recall score = 0.959459459459
Iteration 5 : recall score = 0.893939393939
Mean recall score 0.906365863087
-------------------------------------------
C parameter: 100
-------------------------------------------
Iteration 1 : recall score = 0.86301369863
Iteration 2 : recall score = 0.86301369863
Iteration 3 : recall score = 0.966101694915
Iteration 4 : recall score = 0.959459459459
Iteration 5 : recall score = 0.893939393939
Mean recall score 0.909105589115
*********************************************************************************
Best model to choose from cross validation is with C parameter = 0.01
*********************************************************************************
接下来，介绍混淆矩阵。虽然上面的
-
def plot_confusion_matrix(cm, classes,
-
title='Confusion matrix',
-
cmap=plt.cm.Blues):
-
"""
-
This function prints and plots the confusion matrix.
-
"""
-
plt.imshow(cm, interpolation=
'nearest', cmap=cmap)
-
plt.title(title)
-
plt.colorbar()
-
tick_marks = np.arange(len(classes))
-
plt.xticks(tick_marks, classes, rotation=
0)
-
plt.yticks(tick_marks, classes)
-
-
thresh = cm.max() /
2.
-
for i, j
in itertools.product(range(cm.shape[
0]), range(cm.shape[
1])):
-
plt.text(j, i, cm[i, j],
-
horizontalalignment=
"center",
-
color=
"white"
if cm[i, j] > thresh
else
"black")
-
-
plt.tight_layout()
-
plt.ylabel(
'True label')
-
plt.xlabel(
'Predicted label')
-
import itertools
-
lr = LogisticRegression(C = best_c, penalty =
'l1')
-
lr.fit(X_train_undersample,y_train_undersample.values.ravel())
-
y_pred_undersample = lr.predict(X_test_undersample.values)
-
-
# Compute confusion matrix
-
cnf_matrix = confusion_matrix(y_test_undersample,y_pred_undersample)
-
np.set_printoptions(precision=
2)
-
-
print(
"Recall metric in the testing dataset: ", cnf_matrix[
1,
1]/(cnf_matrix[
1,
0]+cnf_matrix[
1,
1]))
-
-
# Plot non-normalized confusion matrix
-
class_names = [
0,
1]
-
plt.figure()
-
plot_confusion_matrix(cnf_matrix
-
, classes=class_names
-
, title=
'Confusion matrix')
-
plt.show()
结果如下：
Recall metric in the testing dataset: 0.931972789116
我们发现：
-
lr = LogisticRegression(C = best_c, penalty =
'l1')
-
lr.fit(X_train_undersample,y_train_undersample.values.ravel())
-
y_pred = lr.predict(X_test.values)
-
-
# Compute confusion matrix
-
cnf_matrix = confusion_matrix(y_test,y_pred)
-
np.set_printoptions(precision=
2)
-
-
print(
"Recall metric in the testing dataset: ", cnf_matrix[
1,
1]/(cnf_matrix[
1,
0]+cnf_matrix[
1,
1]))
-
-
# Plot non-normalized confusion matrix
-
class_names = [
0,
1]
-
plt.figure()
-
plot_confusion_matrix(cnf_matrix
-
, classes=class_names
-
, title=
'Confusion matrix')
-
plt.show()
运行：
best_c = printing_Kfold_scores(X_train,y_train)
C parameter: 0.01
-------------------------------------------
Iteration 1 : recall score = 0.492537313433
Iteration 2 : recall score = 0.602739726027
Iteration 3 : recall score = 0.683333333333
Iteration 4 : recall score = 0.569230769231
Iteration 5 : recall score = 0.45
Mean recall score 0.559568228405
-------------------------------------------
C parameter: 0.1
-------------------------------------------
Iteration 1 : recall score = 0.567164179104
Iteration 2 : recall score = 0.616438356164
Iteration 3 : recall score = 0.683333333333
Iteration 4 : recall score = 0.584615384615
Iteration 5 : recall score = 0.525
Mean recall score 0.595310250644
-------------------------------------------
C parameter: 1
-------------------------------------------
Iteration 1 : recall score = 0.55223880597
Iteration 2 : recall score = 0.616438356164
Iteration 3 : recall score = 0.716666666667
Iteration 4 : recall score = 0.615384615385
Iteration 5 : recall score = 0.5625
Mean recall score 0.612645688837
-------------------------------------------
C parameter: 10
-------------------------------------------
Iteration 1 : recall score = 0.55223880597
Iteration 2 : recall score = 0.616438356164
Iteration 3 : recall score = 0.733333333333
Iteration 4 : recall score = 0.615384615385
Iteration 5 : recall score = 0.575
Mean recall score 0.61847902217
-------------------------------------------
C parameter: 100
-------------------------------------------
Iteration 1 : recall score = 0.55223880597
Iteration 2 : recall score = 0.616438356164
Iteration 3 : recall score = 0.733333333333
Iteration 4 : recall score = 0.615384615385
Iteration 5 : recall score = 0.575
Mean recall score 0.61847902217
*********************************************************************************
Best model to choose from cross validation is with C parameter = 10.0
*********************************************************************************
我们发现：
-
lr = LogisticRegression(C = best_c, penalty =
'l1')
-
lr.fit(X_train,y_train.values.ravel())
-
y_pred_undersample = lr.predict(X_test.values)
-
-
# Compute confusion matrix
-
cnf_matrix = confusion_matrix(y_test,y_pred_undersample)
-
np.set_printoptions(precision=
2)
-
-
print(
"Recall metric in the testing dataset: ", cnf_matrix[
1,
1]/(cnf_matrix[
1,
0]+cnf_matrix[
1,
1]))
-
-
# Plot non-normalized confusion matrix
-
class_names = [
0,
1]
-
plt.figure()
-
plot_confusion_matrix(cnf_matrix
-
, classes=class_names
-
, title=
'Confusion matrix')
-
plt.show()
结果：
Recall metric in the testing dataset: 0.619047619048
我们发现：
设置阈值。
-
lr = LogisticRegression(C =
0.01, penalty =
'l1')
-
lr.fit(X_train_undersample,y_train_undersample.values.ravel())
-
y_pred_undersample_proba = lr.predict_proba(X_test_undersample.values)
#原来时预测类别值，而此处是预测概率。方便后续比较
-
-
thresholds = [
0.1,
0.2,
0.3,
0.4,
0.5,
0.6,
0.7,
0.8,
0.9]
-
-
plt.figure(figsize=(
10,
10))
-
-
j =
1
-
for i
in thresholds:
-
y_test_predictions_high_recall = y_pred_undersample_proba[:,
1] > i
-
-
plt.subplot(
3,
3,j)
-
j +=
1
-
-
# Compute confusion matrix
-
cnf_matrix = confusion_matrix(y_test_undersample,y_test_predictions_high_recall)
-
np.set_printoptions(precision=
2)
-
-
print(
"Recall metric in the testing dataset: ", cnf_matrix[
1,
1]/(cnf_matrix[
1,
0]+cnf_matrix[
1,
1]))
-
-
# Plot non-normalized confusion matrix
-
class_names = [
0,
1]
-
plot_confusion_matrix(cnf_matrix
-
, classes=class_names
-
, title=
'Threshold >= %s'%i)
结果：
换种思路，采用上采样，进行数据增广。
-
import pandas
as pd
-
from imblearn.over_sampling
import SMOTE
#上采样库，导入SMOTE算法
-
from sklearn.ensemble
import RandomForestClassifier
-
from sklearn.metrics
import confusion_matrix
-
from sklearn.model_selection
import train_test_split
-
credit_cards=pd.read_csv(
'creditcard.csv')
-
-
columns=credit_cards.columns
-
# The labels are in the last column ('Class'). Simply remove it to obtain features columns
-
features_columns=columns.delete(len(columns)
-1)
-
-
features=credit_cards[features_columns]
-
labels=credit_cards[
'Class']
-
features_train, features_test, labels_train, labels_test = train_test_split(features,
-
labels,
-
test_size=
0.2,
-
random_state=
0)
-
oversampler=SMOTE(random_state=
0)
#实例化参数，只对训练集增广，测试集不动
-
os_features,os_labels=oversampler.fit_sample(features_train,labels_train)
# 使 0 和 1 样本相等
-
os_features = pd.DataFrame(os_features)
-
os_labels = pd.DataFrame(os_labels)
-
best_c = printing_Kfold_scores(os_features,os_labels)
参数选择的结果：
C parameter: 0.01
-------------------------------------------
Iteration 1 : recall score = 0.890322580645
Iteration 2 : recall score = 0.894736842105
Iteration 3 : recall score = 0.968861347792
Iteration 4 : recall score = 0.957595541926
Iteration 5 : recall score = 0.958430881173
Mean recall score 0.933989438728
-------------------------------------------
C parameter: 0.1
-------------------------------------------
Iteration 1 : recall score = 0.890322580645
Iteration 2 : recall score = 0.894736842105
Iteration 3 : recall score = 0.970410534469
Iteration 4 : recall score = 0.959980655302
Iteration 5 : recall score = 0.960178498807
Mean recall score 0.935125822266
-------------------------------------------
C parameter: 1
-------------------------------------------
Iteration 1 : recall score = 0.890322580645
Iteration 2 : recall score = 0.894736842105
Iteration 3 : recall score = 0.970454796946
Iteration 4 : recall score = 0.96014552489
Iteration 5 : recall score = 0.960596168431
Mean recall score 0.935251182603
-------------------------------------------
C parameter: 10
-------------------------------------------
Iteration 1 : recall score = 0.890322580645
Iteration 2 : recall score = 0.894736842105
Iteration 3 : recall score = 0.97065397809
Iteration 4 : recall score = 0.960343368396
Iteration 5 : recall score = 0.960530220596
Mean recall score 0.935317397966
-------------------------------------------
C parameter: 100
-------------------------------------------
Iteration 1 : recall score = 0.890322580645
Iteration 2 : recall score = 0.894736842105
Iteration 3 : recall score = 0.970543321899
Iteration 4 : recall score = 0.960211472725
Iteration 5 : recall score = 0.960903924995
Mean recall score 0.935343628474
*********************************************************************************
Best model to choose from cross validation is with C parameter = 100.0
*********************************************************************************
打印一下混淆矩阵的结果：
-
lr = LogisticRegression(C = best_c, penalty =
'l1')
-
lr.fit(os_features,os_labels.values.ravel())
-
y_pred = lr.predict(features_test.values)
-
-
# Compute confusion matrix
-
cnf_matrix = confusion_matrix(labels_test,y_pred)
-
np.set_printoptions(precision=
2)
-
-
print(
"Recall metric in the testing dataset: ", cnf_matrix[
1,
1]/(cnf_matrix[
1,
0]+cnf_matrix[
1,
1]))
-
-
# Plot non-normalized confusion matrix
-
class_names = [
0,
1]
-
plt.figure()
-
plot_confusion_matrix(cnf_matrix
-
, classes=class_names
-
, title=
'Confusion matrix')
-
plt.show()
总结：
1万+
被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?
到【灌水乐园】发言
