你见过最狠的SCI评论是什么?

链接：https://www.zhihu.com/question/430036342

编辑：深度学习与计算机视觉

声明：仅做学术分享，侵删

作者：万老师
https://www.zhihu.com/question/430036342/answer/1590607788

“This paper is, simply manure"

"What the authors have done is an insult to science"

还有一条更让人崩溃的是：

"You should look closely at a career outside of scinece"

这是直接劝作者退出学术圈了啊……

所以，想想如果你平时投稿时只是收到一些普通的拒稿邮件，哪怕就文章内容批评几句，已经是多么幸运的事！

然而……

还有大量更毒的审稿意见，有些时候连审稿人自己都被“ 毒”到了，以下是 从2001年至2011年，《Environmental Microbiology》每年都会发布一些审稿意见集锦中收集的

毒舌搞笑篇：

1. Reject – More holes than my grandad’s string vest!

拒发。漏洞比我爷爷的网眼背心上的网眼还多！

2. "Done! Difficult task, I don’t wish to think about constipation and faecal flora during my holidays! But, once a referee, always and anywhere a referee; we are good boy scouts in the research wilderness. Even under the sun and near a wonderful beach."

搞定了！太不容易了。我才不想装着一脑子便秘和粪便菌落来度假。但是，一朝做了审稿人，永远都是审稿人，到哪儿都是审稿人。在科学研究的荒漠中，我们是勇敢的童子军。即使在洒满阳光的沙滩上也是。哼！

3. "This paper is desperate. Please reject it completely and then block the author’s email ID so they can’t use the online system in future."

这篇论文烂到家了。请彻底拒稿，然后封了作者的账号，免得他日后继续投稿。

4. "The writing and data presentation are so bad that I had to leave work and go home early and then spend time to wonder what life is about."

写作水平和数据展示让我整个人都不好了，我不得不提前下班，早点回家，甚至开始怀疑人生。

5. "The biggest problem with this manu, which has nearly sucked the will to live out of me, is the terrible writing style."

这篇稿件的写作风格太糟糕了，审得我都不想活了。

6. "The presentation is of a standard that I would reject from an undergraduate student."

就算回到本科生时期，我都会拒掉这种水平的投稿。

7. "This paper is awfully written. There is no adequate objective and no reasonable conclusion. The literature is quoted at random and not in the context of argument. I have doubts about the methods and whether the effort of data gathering is sufficient to arrive at a useful conclusion."

这篇论文写得太烂了。目的不明确，结论不合理。引文都是乱引的，跟正文的论证完全对不上号。我怀疑这样的实验方法，也怀疑他们收集的数据不足以得出有效结论。

8. "Season’s Greetings! I apologise for my slow response but a roast goose prevented me from answering emails for a few days."

节日快乐！回复慢了，真抱歉。有一只烤鹅妨碍我，让我几天都没顾得上回邮件。

见识过了审稿人的毒舌和幽默，再来见识一下审稿人怎么夸人。但当审稿人遇到非常棒的论文，也会给出衷心的好评。

好吧，为了鼓励大家继续好好写论文投论文，我们最后还是放些点赞的审稿意见吧

1. “Very much enjoyed reading this one, and do not have any significant comments. Wish I had thought of this one.”

这篇论文读起来简直是一种享受，没有任何意见。这么好的点子我当初怎么没想到！

2. “There was little I could think of to improve this nice paper.”

这篇论文好得我都不知道要怎么改了。

3. "This is as solid a write up as I have seen, many spend much more time and space to say considerably less. It is a perfect example of a compact report."

这是我见过的最确凿的报告，许多人花更多时间精力写出来的比这个差多了。作为一篇翔实的报告，这是一个完美的例子。

4. "landmark paper on P. putida physiology."

假单胞菌生理学研究的里程碑

5. "It is always a joy to review manus such as this. Well conceived, well executed, well edited. Clean. Pristine. From start to finish."

评审这样的稿件是件人生乐事：构思周详，实施得当，写得漂亮。干净，纯朴，从头至尾。

作者：中间派
https://www.zhihu.com/question/430036342/answer/1587408730

I cannot see any scientific contribution of this paper to the literature already published in the 19th century. Moreover, it contains substantial English and scientific errors nearly in every sentence.

.......（然后逐句指出错误）

In summary，the paper could have been more relevant had it been published prior to the year 1818.

———————————（分割线）————————

发现回答写的有歧义  审稿人并没有全文一句句指出错误啊！我只是想表达审稿人把有错误的句子逐个列出来的意思

作者：Jiazi
https://www.zhihu.com/question/430036342/answer/1593064029

应该是我自己写的吧：

To be honest, I just read the abstract and took a quick glance on the tables and figures in the manuscript.
Considering that there are issues with literally EVERY sentence in the abstract, and the complete mess in the figures/tables, there is no need to waste time on it. 

说实话，我就读了一下摘要，扫了一眼文中的图表。考虑到摘要中的每一句话都有问题，以及图表乱成渣，就没有必要在这上面浪费时间了。

然后把摘要里的每一句的错误指出来——真的是摘要里每一句话都有错误！！！！

作者：覚醒屋
https://www.zhihu.com/question/430036342/answer/1599194181

哈哈，我贴一个之前审过稿，这周刚抄送来的decision邮件——

• 暴怒的Reviewer1：

"The descriptions of the design are very vague, and, overall, authors do not highlight the differences between their design and previous proposals in the literature."

"Besides that, there are many dubious statements and imprecisions along the paper"

"It is the last straw that I have found four other papers of the same authors, not referenced or mention in the submission, which describe very similar designs or the same parts of it. Bellow there are the references:"

• 无语的Reviewer2：

Comments to the Author

(There are no comments. Please check to see if comments were included as a file attachment with this e-mail or as an attachment in your Author Center.)

☆ END ☆

如果看到这里，说明你喜欢这篇文章，请转发、点赞。微信搜索「uncle_pn」，欢迎添加小编微信「 mthler」，每日朋友圈更新一篇高质量博文。

↓扫描二维码添加小编↓