如何写 peer review

最近在协助导师完成审稿工作,邀请到的几位 reviewer 十分负责,回复结构很清晰,所以总结在这里,供大家学习。

(1)概括作者工作
The authors investigated that ?
They analyzed ?
It was found that ?
The authors claimed that ?

(2)适当赞扬
The study is well desinged and conducted. The sample is relevant.
I find the paper relevant and interesting.
Methods, results and data interpretation are scientifically sound.
Methods, results and data interpretation are excellent and clear.
Limitiations are well described at the end of the article.
Excellent important message with a clear and high level methodology.

(3)话锋一转,指出问题
However, I see that ……
I have just a couple of questions for the authors.
The authors should better support why ……
Please explain ……
In the introduction authors should clearly justify why ……

(4)审稿意见
What is the level of revision required based on your comments:
Substantial revisions
Moderate revisions
Minor revisions
Rejected

  • 4
    点赞
  • 5
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论

“相关推荐”对你有帮助么?

  • 非常没帮助
  • 没帮助
  • 一般
  • 有帮助
  • 非常有帮助
提交
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值