最近在协助导师完成审稿工作,邀请到的几位 reviewer 十分负责,回复结构很清晰,所以总结在这里,供大家学习。
(1)概括作者工作
The authors investigated that ?
They analyzed ?
It was found that ?
The authors claimed that ?
(2)适当赞扬
The study is well desinged and conducted. The sample is relevant.
I find the paper relevant and interesting.
Methods, results and data interpretation are scientifically sound.
Methods, results and data interpretation are excellent and clear.
Limitiations are well described at the end of the article.
Excellent important message with a clear and high level methodology.
(3)话锋一转,指出问题
However, I see that ……
I have just a couple of questions for the authors.
The authors should better support why ……
Please explain ……
In the introduction authors should clearly justify why ……
(4)审稿意见
What is the level of revision required based on your comments:
Substantial revisions
Moderate revisions
Minor revisions
Rejected
本文总结了学术论文审稿过程中的关键步骤与建议,包括概括作者的研究内容、适当赞扬研究的优点、指出存在的问题以及提出具体的审稿意见。

4005

被折叠的 条评论
为什么被折叠?



