Why Scrum will never work

http://maurits.wordpress.com/2011/07/13/why-scrum-will-never-work/


Why Scrum will never work

July 13, 2011 at 11:22 am | Posted in Agile, Programming | 37 Comments

With such a slightly provocative title I will probably have to start with the disclaimer first: what is written here is my own opinion and not necessarily that of my employer. That is, if I still have one after posting this blog. What’s more: I’m a big fan of Scrum and other Agile methods. It pays my bills. Uh wait, let me rephrase that a bit more accurate: I’m totally 100 % convinced that Scrum works for software development.

Now with these formalities behind me let’s get a bit more serious: I really like Scrum. I have been using it for the last 5 years, I haven given several presentations about (distributed) Scrum at several conferences, I’ve written an article about it together with Scrum guru Jeff Sutherland, etc. However now that the Agile Manifesto is 10 years old I thought it would be fun to put on Edward de Bono‘s black hat and explain why Scrum is never ever going to work.


Reason 1: the cornerstone of Scrum is about trusting people. Creating a safe environment so that we can be open to each other, learn from our mistakes. And all that other touchy-feely hippy back to the 60′s stuff. That is not going to work! Did you notice my disclaimer when I started this blog? I had to put it there because quite a few people read my blog, including customers and my boss. There are a lot of pointy haired bosses out there (oh no, another disclaimer: by boss isn’t one, he is a nice friendly guy, bla bla bla). This world is full of alpha males (and females?) who are not at the least interested in you, your process, the outcome, etc. Being open is only going to hurt your career. Room for mistakes, taking risks? Don’t be naive!

Reason 2: according to Scrum ‘people do the best they can’ if you give them enough freedom. What the hell is this based upon? They don’t. They will probably do the least they can because in general most software developers are underpaid, especially compared to their managers. That’s why they want to become managers or software architects as soon as possible, since they can then still be lazy without anyone noticing and the added bonus that they are getting better paid.

Reason 3: because of the previous reason we still have to put project management on top of Scrum teams, so at least it has some output. So this is probably going to be business as usual. Assigning tasks to team members, micromanaging developers, demanding progress reports, etc. All the usual actions to slow your team down as much as possible.

Reason 4: Scrum is just a process. I have seen many processes (like CMM which is nowadays called CMMI) and I have seen them all fail and leave a lot of frustrated people behind. So if you are stuck (like most companies) with a bunch of average people then nothing is going to change. Scrum doesn’t improve your software, good people do! And by definition, you don’t have those good people since you just have Joe Average (or worse) as a programmer because your company doesn’t want to pay a decent salary.

Reason 5: Scrum delivers ‘business value’. Well no, actually it doesn’t. For many reasons. The guys or girls that know about business are not going to be involved in your project. They like to lunch with customers, not work on this weird thing called backlog to explain a bunch of introvert nerdy software developers what to do. So your team ends up with a junior help desk employee as a product owner. And besides, your whole ICT department is a cost center anyhow. So don’t start about business value.


Reason 6: an Agile team is supposed to continuously improve. That is why Scrum has retrospectives to see what went well, what can be improved and to define actions. Now do you really think people want to improve? First they have to think of possible improvement actions. Next they may even have to execute them, which might well take them way out of their comfort zone. People resist change, and therefor improvements. Your old working habits may suck, but at least they kinda work and it gets you through the day.

Reason 7: the Product Owner focusses on the ‘what’ and ‘why’ questions, the development team decides ‘how’. Nicely separated so the team can go for quality and thus high velocity on the long term. However, this is not going to work. Your product owner wants this functionality right now and doesn’t care the least about software quality. Just deliver those features as fast as possible because there always is a deadline, promises made to this important customer, etc. And don’t think you can blow away this junior product owner, because behind him is this business manager ranked high in the companies hierarchy. You as a developer are just part of a cost center and probably going to be outsourced soon anyhow. Now how is that for motivation and trust?

Reason 8: my previous point was about quality. There is some evidence that pushing productivity lowers the quality of software. On the other hand, when you focus on quality, you will get higher productivity. However Joe Average programmer doesn’t care about software quality. If the quality is poor, developing some piece of software takes more time, but why care? He is getting paid between 9 and 5. The project manager (or Scrummaster!) will take the blame for missed schedules. Even worse, if this developer is hired from another company it is in his (and his company’s) interest to stay as long as possible. So this all means that your productivity in Scrum isn’t going to be the least bit higher than with any other method.

Reason 9: “yes, but if we only build the necessary features, then at least we will have a lower total cost, right?” It never stops to amaze me how naive people are when they say something like that. You don’t build necessary features. Most of the time you are on a fixed-price contract for a major banking or insurance company. Or even worse: a government contract. They have selected you because you offered the cheapest bid (which is pretty naive in itself) but they are going to make sure that you will deliver all the requirements they have stated up-front. Of course at least 50 % of these requirements have no business value at all, but hey, you aren’t going to fool the project manager that handles the project from the customer side. He is an alpha male and you are going to deliver that last bloody feature as well!

Wow, wearing that black hat was even more fun than I thought! Must…. take…. it…. off.. now…



在使用Python来安装geopandas包时,由于geopandas依赖于几个其他的Python库(如GDAL, Fiona, Pyproj, Shapely等),因此安装过程可能需要一些额外的步骤。以下是一个基本的安装指南,适用于大多数用户: 使用pip安装 确保Python和pip已安装: 首先,确保你的计算机上已安装了Python和pip。pip是Python的包管理工具,用于安装和管理Python包。 安装依赖库: 由于geopandas依赖于GDAL, Fiona, Pyproj, Shapely等库,你可能需要先安装这些库。通常,你可以通过pip直接安装这些库,但有时候可能需要从其他源下载预编译的二进制包(wheel文件),特别是GDAL和Fiona,因为它们可能包含一些系统级的依赖。 bash pip install GDAL Fiona Pyproj Shapely 注意:在某些系统上,直接使用pip安装GDAL和Fiona可能会遇到问题,因为它们需要编译一些C/C++代码。如果遇到问题,你可以考虑使用conda(一个Python包、依赖和环境管理器)来安装这些库,或者从Unofficial Windows Binaries for Python Extension Packages这样的网站下载预编译的wheel文件。 安装geopandas: 在安装了所有依赖库之后,你可以使用pip来安装geopandas。 bash pip install geopandas 使用conda安装 如果你正在使用conda作为你的Python包管理器,那么安装geopandas和它的依赖可能会更简单一些。 创建一个新的conda环境(可选,但推荐): bash conda create -n geoenv python=3.x anaconda conda activate geoenv 其中3.x是你希望使用的Python版本。 安装geopandas: 使用conda-forge频道来安装geopandas,因为它提供了许多地理空间相关的包。 bash conda install -c conda-forge geopandas 这条命令会自动安装geopandas及其所有依赖。 注意事项 如果你在安装过程中遇到任何问题,比如编译错误或依赖问题,请检查你的Python版本和pip/conda的版本是否是最新的,或者尝试在不同的环境中安装。 某些库(如GDAL)可能需要额外的系统级依赖,如地理空间库(如PROJ和GEOS)。这些依赖可能需要单独安装,具体取决于你的操作系统。 如果你在Windows上遇到问题,并且pip安装失败,尝试从Unofficial Windows Binaries for Python Extension Packages网站下载相应的wheel文件,并使用pip进行安装。 脚本示例 虽然你的问题主要是关于如何安装geopandas,但如果你想要一个Python脚本来重命名文件夹下的文件,在原始名字前面加上字符串"geopandas",以下是一个简单的示例: python import os # 指定文件夹路径 folder_path = 'path/to/your/folder' # 遍历文件夹中的文件 for filename in os.listdir(folder_path): # 构造原始文件路径 old_file_path = os.path.join(folder_path, filename) # 构造新文件名 new_filename = 'geopandas_' + filename # 构造新文件路径 new_file_path = os.path.join(folder_path, new_filename) # 重命名文件 os.rename(old_file_path, new_file_path) print(f'Renamed "{filename}" to "{new_filename}"') 请确保将'path/to/your/folder'替换为你想要重命名文件的实际文件夹路径。
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值