论文写作 18: 审稿意见回复要直截了当

闵帆

已于 2022-12-09 15:36:06 修改

阅读量1.4k

点赞数 5

分类专栏：论文写作文章标签：论文写作

于 2021-12-16 23:24:18 首次发布

本文链接：https://blog.csdn.net/minfanphd/article/details/121986124

版权

论文修改审稿人回复期刊投稿学术写作论文质量

关键词由CSDN通过智能技术生成

论文写作专栏收录该内容

49 篇文章

订阅专栏

这篇博客分享了在期刊投稿过程中，面对编辑和审稿人反馈的修改意见时，如何正确和有效地进行论文修改及回复。内容包括：1) 保持积极态度，理解审稿人的帮助性质；2) 直接回应问题，避免偏离主题；3) 修改重点在于正文，用蓝色标记改动；4) 注意审稿人的细节，如拼写错误；5) 精炼地回复审稿人的总结；6) 在论文中详细解释重要问题；7) 如有遗漏，自行添加；8) 尽量简洁回复；9) 对英文写作进行润色；10) 增加对实验结果的讨论。

摘要生成于 C知道，由 DeepSeek-R1 满血版支持，前往体验 >

稿件投到期刊, 如果编辑让你修改, 多半就有戏了. 在修改论文的同时, 需要准备一个 point-to-point 的回复. 几点注意事项:

思想上务必要端正态度, 编辑和审稿人花大量时间义务审稿不是想为难你, 而是来帮助你改进论文质量.
问题应该直接回答, 而不要顾左右而言他.
回复不要太长, 正文中进行相应的修改才是重点. 审稿人更关注你正文修改得如何, 毕竟它才是呈现给读者的内容.
正文中修改部分应用蓝色字标出.
审稿人的拼写错误要帮他纠正.

例子:
The paper clearly states what it will do. Giving a reasonable estimation to the number of labels in cost-sensitive active learning is indeed important. The idea is new.
Response: We thank the reviewer for the kind words.

审稿人会对你的论文进行一个总结, 你直接这样回复表示感谢即可.

Why is determining the number of labels in cost-sensitive active learning
an important issue?
Response: In cost-sensitive active learning, a higher number of queried labels leads to higher teacher costs, but may also reduce the misclassification cost. Hence, the number of labels determines the trade-off between the teacher and misclassification costs. We have added some text to explain this in the second paragraph of the introduction.
问题通常有编号, 如果审稿人没给编号, 你自己也给一个. 这里直接回答问题, 同时指出在论文中哪里进行了修改.
Why is the optimization objective of cost-sensitive active learning to minimize the sum of the teacher cost and the misclassification cost?
Response: Cost-sensitive learning usually aims to minimize the total cost. Because we consider teacher and misclassification costs in this paper, the optimization objective is to minimize their sum. We have added some explanations to clarify this in Section 3.1.
和上一条相似.
Page 7, “Min et al. [23] considered the classification expectation and divided the entire data into three regions.” Do you use a similar method of three regions in this paper?
Response: In paper [23] (now [28]), Region I contains instances for which the expected misclassification cost is lower than the teacher cost, Region II contains instances to be labeled by the oracle, and Region III contains the remaining instances. In this paper, we use a similar method that consists of three regions. Region I contains instances labeled by the oracle, Region II contains instances classified by the active learner, and Region III contains the remaining instances.
参考文献编号可能改变.
In Figure 1, “Round 1” may be better than “Step 1.”
Response: We accept the reviewer’s suggestion.
这个回复就很短, 甚至可以写成 “Suggestion accepted.”
The English writing should be polished, especially in the experimental part.
Response: We thank the reviewer for this important suggestion. We have consulted Edanz Editing to address the language issues.
有钱任性, 就可以找专业编辑修改语言. 一篇论文需要 3000-5000 RMB, 而且现在的科研经费不能报销 (曾经可以).
Experiments: I missed a discussion of the results. A discussion of the results is needed.
Response: Thank you for bringing this important issue to our attention. We have added Section 6.5 to discuss the advantages and limitations of ALSE.
为了一个审稿意见, 我们会增加一个小节甚至新的对比算法. 本文算法的优势和劣势都要讨论, 这才是科研的态度.
如果你自己找到以前版本的某些问题, 悄悄改了就行, 不要给审稿人说. 除非这个修改太大, 肯定会被看到.