Alcohol intake and cause-specific mortality: conventional and genetic evidence in a prospective---

Millwood IY, Im PK, Bennett D, Hariri P, Yang L, Du H, Kartsonaki C, Lin K, Yu C, Chen Y, Sun D, Zhang N, Avery D, Schmidt D, Pei P, Chen J, Clarke R, Lv J, Peto R, Walters RG, Li L, Chen Z; China Kadoorie Biobank Collaborative Group. Alcohol intake and cause-specific mortality: conventional and genetic evidence in a prospective cohort study of 512 000 adults in China. Lancet Public Health. 2023 Dec;8(12):e956-e967. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00217-7. Epub 2023 Nov 21. PMID: 38000378.
Background Genetic variants that affect alcohol use in East Asian populations could help assess the causal effects of
alcohol consumption on cause-specific mortality. We aimed to investigate the associations between alcohol intake and
cause-specific mortality using conventional and genetic epidemiological methods among more than 512 000 adults in
China.
Methods The prospective China Kadoorie Biobank cohort study enrolled 512724 adults (210205 men and
302 519 women) aged 30–79 years, during 2004–08. Residents with no major disabilities from ten diverse urban and
rural areas of China were invited to participate, and alcohol use was self-reported. During 12 years of follow-up,
56 550 deaths were recorded through linkage to death registries, including 23457 deaths among 168050 participants
genotyped for ALDH2 -rs671 and ADH1B -rs1229984. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for cause-specific mortality by self
reported and genotype-predicted alcohol intake were estimated using Cox regression.
Findings 33% of men drank alcohol most weeks. In conventional observational analyses, ex-drinkers, non-drinkers,
and heavy drinkers had higher risks of death from most major causes than moderate drinkers. Among current
drinkers, each 100 g/week higher alcohol intake was associated with higher mortality risks from cancers (HR 1·18
[95% CI 1·14−1·22]), cardiovascular disease (CVD; HR 1·19 [1·15−1·24]), liver diseases (HR 1·51 [1·27−1·78]), non
medical causes (HR 1·15 [1·08−1·23]), and all causes (HR 1·18 [1·15−1·20]). In men, ALDH2 -rs671 and ADH1B
rs1229984 genotypes predicted 60-fold differences in mean alcohol intake (4 g/week in the lowest group vs 255 g/week
in the highest). Genotype-predicted alcohol intake was uniformly and positively associated with risks of death from all
causes (n=12 939; HR 1·07 [95% CI 1·05−1·10]) and from pre-defined alcohol-related cancers (n=1274; 1·12
[1·04−1·21]), liver diseases (n=110; 1·31 [1·02−1·69]), and CVD (n=6109; 1·15 [1·10−1·19]), chiefly due to stroke
(n=3285; 1·18 [1·12–1·24]) rather than ischaemic heart disease (n=2363; 1·06 [0·99–1·14]). Results were largely
consistent using a polygenic score to predict alcohol intake, with higher intakes associated with higher risks of death
from alcohol-related cancers, CVD, and all causes. Approximately 2% of women were current drinkers, and although
power was low to assess observational associations of alcohol with mortality, the genetic evidence suggested that the
excess risks in men were due to alcohol, not pleiotropy.
Interpretation Higher alcohol intake increased the risks of death overall and from major diseases for men in China. There was no genetic evidence of protection from moderate drinking for all-cause and cause-specific mortality, including CVD.
Research in context
Evidence before this study
Moderate alcohol intake has been associated with lower risks of
mortality overall and from specific diseases—in particular,
ischaemic heart disease. However, these associations might be
largely non-causal, as conventional observational studies of
alcohol use are susceptible to bias from reverse causation and
residual confounding. Genetic evidence from Mendelian
randomisation studies, in particular using the ALDH2 -rs671 and
ADH1B -rs1229984 variants, which strongly affect alcohol
intake and are common in East Asian populations, can help
assess the causal relevance of alcohol intake for cause-specific
mortality.
We searched PubMed from database inception to Feb 25, 2023
using the following search terms (title or abstract) for articles
published in English: ([Alcohol AND Mendelian) or (ALDH2 or
ADH1B or rs671 or rs1229984 or aldehyde dehydrogenase or
alcohol dehydrogenase]) AND (mortality or death or fatal), and
reviewed bibliographies within the identified publications.
Two previous Mendelian randomisation studies of alcohol and
mortality in populations with European ancestry, and one in
Chinese men, reported that higher alcohol intake was
associated with higher risks of all-cause mortality. However,
these studies did not assess causal relevance across a wide range
of alcohol intakes and did not evaluate effects on cause-specific
mortality.
Added value of this study
The present prospective study used both conventional and
genetic approaches within the same population. The genetic
analyses minimised artefacts of confounding and reverse
causation and assessed potential causal relevance across a wide
range of alcohol intakes, from negligible to moderate and
heavy intakes. Among Chinese men, conventional
observational analyses showed characteristic J-shaped
associations of self-reported alcohol intake categories with
overall and cause-specific mortality, with highest risks among
ex-drinkers, non-drinkers, and heavy drinkers, and lowest risks
among moderate drinkers, consistent with findings from
similar studies in populations of high-income countries.
Genetic analyses, using two genetic variants that predicted a
60-fold difference in mean intake (from 4 g/week in the lowest
category to 255 g/week in the highest category) showed that
higher alcohol intake was associated with a uniform dose–
response increase in risks of death overall and from some
cancers, CVD, and liver diseases. There were no genetic
associations with respiratory or non-medical (mainly accidents
and injuries) causes of death. There was no genetic evidence
that moderate alcohol intake (ie, 10–20 g/day) had substantial
protective effects for cause-specific or overall mortality,
including for ischaemic heart disease deaths. In separate genetic
analyses using a polygenic score to predict alcohol intake, there
were similar associations with mortality overall, and from
alcohol-related cancers and cardiovascular disease (CVD), across
different alcohol intakes.
Alcohol intake was extremely low among women in the study,
and the genetic variants had little effect on mortality overall or
from specific causes, suggesting that the higher risks in men
were chiefly mediated by alcohol, rather than by any pleiotropic
effects of the genotypes studied.
Implications of all the available evidence
Genetic studies, particularly in East Asian ancestry populations,
have helped to reliably clarify the causal relevance of alcohol
intake with mortality by accounting for biases in conventional
observational approaches. The genetic evidence provides
strong support for causal harmful effects of alcohol use, with
risks of deaths from CVD, cancer, liver disease, and all-causes.
There is no genetic evidence of any net beneficial effects of
moderate drinking compared with not drinking for any causes
of death, including CVD. These genetic studies that assess
causal relevance have improved our understanding of the
adverse effects of alcohol use on mortality, particularly at lower
intakes. This knowledge can improve estimation of the
regional and global burden of alcohol use, and inform public
health policies to address the risks of moderate and heavy
drinking
Mendelian randomisation uses genetic variants as
instrumental variables to assess the causal relevance of
alcohol intake while minimising the biases inherent to
conventional observational studies
Figure 1: Conventional and genetic associations of alcohol intake with major
cause-specific and all-cause mortality in men
Conventional epidemiological analyses relate self-reported drinking patterns at
baseline to mortality from major causes (all major causes are shown except for
infectious diseases, for which the number of deaths was lower) and all-causes.
Current drinkers with the lowest mean alcohol intake are the reference group.
The black squares represent findings from the main model adjusted for age-at
risk, area, education, household income, smoking, physical activity, and fresh
fruit intake, with exclusion of participants with previous chronic disease. The
HRs for current drinkers are plotted against usual alcohol intake, and a weighted
linear regression through the plotted estimates gives the HR (95% CI) per
100 g/week (~1–2 drinks per day, assuming 1 drink contains 10 g alcohol).
The grey squares represent findings from sensitivity analyses that further
exclude the first 5 years of follow-up. Genetic epidemiological analyses relate
mean alcohol intake in six categories of genotype-predicted intake to mortality
from major causes. The lowest mean intake group is the reference, and analyses
are adjusted for age-at-risk, area, and genomic national principal components.
HRs are plotted against the mean alcohol intake in each category. The HR
(95% CI) per 100 g/week is the inverse-variance-weighted mean of a weighted
linear regression through the plotted estimates within each study area, adjusted
for age-at-risk and genomic regional principal components. The HR (95% CI)
across six genetic categories in women applied the mean male intakes for each
category, and the heterogeneity of effects was compared between men and
women, to assess pleiotropy. The HR is plotted on a log scale. Each box
represents HR with the area inversely proportional to the variance of the group
specific log hazard within each subplot. The vertical lines indicate group-specific
95% CIs. HR=hazard ratio.
Figure 2: Conventional and genetic associations of alcohol intake with
mortality from aggregated cancers and cardiovascular disease types in men
Conventional epidemiological analyses relate self-reported drinking patterns at
baseline to mortality from aggregated cancers and cardiovascular disease types.
Alcohol-related cancers include lip, oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, oesophagus,
liver, and colon-rectum, defined as related to alcohol by the International
Agency for Research on Cancer. Current drinkers with the lowest mean alcohol
intake are the reference group. The black squares represent findings from the
main model adjusted for age-at-risk, area, education, household income,
smoking, physical activity, and fresh fruit intake, with exclusion of participants
with previous chronic disease. The HRs for current drinkers are plotted against
usual alcohol intake, and a weighted linear regression through the plotted
estimates gives the HR (95% CI) per 100 g/week (~1–2 drinks per day, assuming
1 drink contains 10 g alcohol). The grey squares represent findings from
sensitivity analyses that further exclude the first 5 years of follow-up. Genetic
epidemiological analyses relate mean alcohol intake in six categories of
genotype-predicted intake to mortality. The lowest mean intake group is the
reference, and analyses are adjusted for age-at-risk, area, and genomic national
principal components. HRs are plotted against the mean alcohol intake in each
category. The HR (95% CI) per 100 g/week is the inverse-variance-weighted
mean of a weighted linear regression through the plotted estimates within each
study area, adjusted for age-at-risk and genomic regional principal components.
The HR (95% CI) across six genetic categories in women applied the mean male
intakes for each category, and the heterogeneity of effects was compared
between men and women, to assess pleiotropy. The HR is plotted on a log scale.
Each box represents HR with the area inversely proportional to the variance of
the group-specific log hazard within each subplot. The vertical lines indicate
group-specific 95% CIs. HR=hazard ratio.
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值