Richard Dillon,1-3 Robert Hills,4 Sylvie Freeman,5 Nicola Potter,1,2 Jelena Jovanovic,1 Adam Ivey,1 Anju Shankar Kanda,1 Manohursingh Runglall,1 Nicola Foot,2 Mikel Valganon,2 Asim Khwaja,6 Jamie Cavenagh,7 Matthew Smith,7 Hans Beier Ommen,8 Ulrik Malthe Overgaard,9 Mike Dennis,10 Steven Knapper,11 Harpreet Kaur,12 David Taussig,13 Priyanka Mehta,14 Kavita Raj,3 Igor Novitzky-Basso,15 Emmanouil Nikolousis,16 Robert Danby,17 Pramila Krishnamurthy,18 Kate Hill,19 Damian Finnegan,20 Samah Alimam,1,3 Erin Hurst,21 Peter Johnson,22 Anjum Khan,23 Rahuman Salim,24 Charles Craddock,25 Ruth Spearing,26 Amanda Gilkes,11 Rosemary Gale,6 Alan Burnett,27 Nigel H. Russell,3,28 David Grimwade,1,3 on behalf of the UK National Cancer Research Institute Acute Myeloid Leukaemia Working Group
1Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, King’s College, London, United Kingdom; 2Cancer Genetics Service, Viapath, Guy’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom; 3Department of Haematology, Guy’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom; 4Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, United Kingdom; 5Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom; 6Department of Haematology, University College, London, United Kingdom; 7Bart’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom; 8University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; 9Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; 10Christie Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom; 11Department of Haematology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom; 12Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom; 13Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, United Kingdom; 14Bristol Haematology and Oncology Centre, Bristol, United Kingdom; 15Beatson Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom; 16Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom; 17Churchill Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom; 18Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom; 19University Hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom; 20Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, United Kingdom; 21Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle, United Kingdom; 22Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; 23St James’ Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom; 24Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Liverpool, United Kingdom; 25Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom; 26Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand;27Blackwaterfoot, Isle of Arran, United Kingdom; 28Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, United Kingdom
翻译:黄燕 福建医科大学附属协和医院血液科
审校:胡建达 福建医科大学附属协和医院血液科
摘要
关键点:
- 移植前MRD水平可预测结局;外周血中200个拷贝/105 ABL和骨髓中1,000个拷贝/105 ABL的阈值是有区别的。
- 移植前MRD阳性低于这些水平的患者的复发主要限于FLT3-ITD患者。
摘要
对于接受异基因造血干细胞移植(allogeneic stem cell transplantation, alloSCT)的急性髓系白血病(acute myeloid leukemia, AML)患者来说,复发仍然是治疗失败的最常见原因,且预后不良。多项研究已表明,在alloSCT前通过流式细胞术评估存在微小残留病灶(measurable residual disease, MRD)是复发的有力预测因素。但是,尚不清楚如何将这些发现应用于由具有更高敏感性的分子学检测为MRD阳性的患者中。针对入组英国国家癌症研究中心AML17研究的107例
NPM1突变型AML患者,我们进行了移植前血液和骨髓样本的逆转录聚合酶链式反应分析。在中位随访4.9年后,MRD阴性、低水平(外周血中<200个拷贝/10
5 ABL,骨髓液中<1,000个拷贝/10
5 ABL)和高水平患者的2年总生存率(2-year overall survival, 2y-OS)分别为83%、63%和13%(
P<0.0001)。对alloSCT前MRD低水平患者来说,存在
FLT3内部串联重复序列(internal tandem duplications, ITDs)的患者预后明显较差(风险比[hazard ratio, HR],6.14;
P=0.01)。结合这些具有高预测价值的变量将患者分为2组,其2y-OS分别为17%和82%(HR,13.2;
P<0.0001)。在整个队列和MRD阳性的患者中,去T细胞治疗与显著降低的生存率有关,2y-OS分别为 56% vs 96%(HR,3.24;
P=0.0005)及34% vs 100%(HR,3.78;
P=0.003),但是预处理方案或供者来源则对其没有显著影响。本研究注册于ISRCTN(http://www.ISRCTN.com/ISRCTN55675535)。(Blood. 2020;135(9):680-688)
表1.每个MRD定义的组中的临床、分子和移植相关变量。
![63eb5206d1d5093f4d4d61ad884a427c.png](https://i-blog.csdnimg.cn/blog_migrate/0d10a74c137324acf7a8ce7c90e07ae0.png)
Spearman相关性
P值用于年龄比较,Mantel-Haenszel
P值用于所有其他变量。CR1,首次完全缓解;PB,外周血。
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2019002959
![2581d62aefdc1ac472e6e4297ec9a30c.png](https://i-blog.csdnimg.cn/blog_migrate/2567ba69e01f7e1ec3348d0a6b767151.jpeg)
美国血液学会授权富博思开发Blood中文版,内容摘自Blood原刊。版权
©2019 美国血液学会,版权所有。“美国血液学会”、“ASH”以及ASH的标志皆为美国血液学会的注册商标。