《亲密关系》读后感_设计的直觉和亲密感

最新推荐文章于 2024-09-17 23:15:58 发布

cunya6061

最新推荐文章于 2024-09-17 23:15:58 发布

阅读量201

点赞数

文章标签： python java linux 人工智能算法

原文链接：https://timkadlec.com/2010/09/intuition-and-intimacy-in-design/

版权

《亲密关系》读后感

In an old, but still relevant, article from Wired, Brian Eno talks about the value of designing with limited options:

Brian Eno 在Wired的一篇古老而又相关的文章中谈到了有限选项设计的价值：

Designers struggle endlessly with a problem that is almost nonexistent for users: “How do we pack the maximum number of options into the minimum space and price?” In my experience, the instruments and tools that endure (because they are loved by their users) have limited options.

设计师不断地为用户解决一个几乎不存在的问题：“我们如何将最大数量的选件包装到最小的空间和价格中？” 以我的经验，可以忍受的工具和工具(因为受到用户的喜爱)具有有限的选择。

He further elaborates, explaining our desire for intimacy with our tools:

他进一步阐述，用我们的工具解释了我们对亲密关系的渴望：

With tools, we crave intimacy. This appetite for emotional resonance explains why users - when given a choice - prefer deep rapport over endless options. You can’t have a relationship with a device whose limits are unknown to you, because without limits it keeps becoming something else.

使用工具，我们渴望亲密。这种对情绪共鸣的胃口解释了为什么用户(在给予选择时)更喜欢深厚的感情而不是无尽的选择。您无法与限制未知的设备建立关系，因为如果没有限制，它将不断成为其他事物。

It’s not a revolutionary concept, designing and building only what is necessary, but it’s a good one to keep in mind. With tools, it’s often better to be the master of few than the jack of all trades.

这不是一个革命性的概念，仅设计和构建必需的东西，但要牢记这一点。借助工具，成为少数几个大师通常比各行各业的杰克更好。