2D OBB Intersection

http://www.flipcode.com/archives/2D_OBB_Intersection.shtml

http://blog.163.com/zhoulong19880518@126/blog/static/607097022012101214522945/

http://blog.csdn.net/szlyc57/article/details/6657018

--------------------------------------------------------------------
2D OBB Intersection

For 2D graphics or movement of 3D objects on a 2D ground plane it is often
useful to discover if the 2D oriented bounding boxes of two objects overlap
(have a non-empty intersection).  One motivating example is the placement of
a new building in a Real-Time Strategy game.  The UI needs to continuously 
check whether the footprint of the new building overlaps the footprint of
any existing building.  If there is any overlap, the UI should indicate that
is an illegal placement.

Stefan Gottschalk's thesis (Collision Queries using Oriented Bounding
Boxes, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of North
Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1999) introduces the separating-axis method
for performing the equivalent test on 3D oriented bounding boxes.
This method depends on the observation that
for two boxes to be disjoint (i.e. *not* intersecting), there must be some axis
along which their projections are disjoint.  The 3D case considers each of 15
 axes as a potential
separating axis.  These axes are the three edge axes of box 1, the three edge
axes of box 2, and the nine cross products formed by taking some edge of box 1
and some edge of box 2.  

In 2D this simplifies dramatically and only four axes need be considered. 
These are
the orthogonal edges of each bounding box.  If a few values are precomputed
every time a box moves, we end up performing only 16 dot products and some
comparisons in the worst case for each overlap test. One nice property of the
separating-axis method is that it can be
structured in an early out fashion, so that many fewer operations are needed in
the case where the boxes do not intersect.  In general, the first test is
extremely
likely to fail (and return "no overlap") when there is no overlap.  If it
passes,
the second test is even more likely to fail if there is no overlap, and so on. 
Only when the boxes are in extremely close proximity is there even a 50% chance
of
executing more than 2 tests.

The C++ code sample provided efficiently computes this fast 2D oriented
bounding box
overlap.  I augmented the OBB2D class with some methods for rendering and
construction to help visualize the result.  OBB2D::overlaps1Way performs the
real work.  It tests to see whether the box passed as an argument overlaps the
current box along either of the current box's dimensions.  Note that this test
must be performed for each box on the other to determine whether there is truly
any overlap.  To make the tests extremely efficient, OBB2D::origin stores the
projection of corner number zero onto a box's axes and the axes are stored
explicitly in OBB2D::axis.  The magnitude of these stored axes is the inverse
of the corresponding edge length so that all overlap tests can be performed on
the interval [0, 1] without normalization, and square roots are avoided
throughout the entire class.

Morgan McGuire morgan@cs.brown.edu



class OBB2D {
private:
    /** Corners of the box, where 0 is the lower left. */
    Vector2         corner[4];

    /** Two edges of the box extended away from corner[0]. */
    Vector2         axis[2];

    /** origin[a] = corner[0].dot(axis[a]); */
    double          origin[2];

    /** Returns true if other overlaps one dimension of this. */
    bool overlaps1Way(const OBB2D& other) const {
        for (int a = 0; a < 2; ++a) {

            double t = other.corner[0].dot(axis[a]);

            // Find the extent of box 2 on axis a
            double tMin = t;
            double tMax = t;

            for (int c = 1; c < 4; ++c) {
                t = other.corner[c].dot(axis[a]);

                if (t < tMin) {
                    tMin = t;
                } else if (t > tMax) {
                    tMax = t;
                }
            }

            // We have to subtract off the origin

            // See if [tMin, tMax] intersects [0, 1]
            if ((tMin > 1 + origin[a]) || (tMax < origin[a])) {
                // There was no intersection along this dimension;
                // the boxes cannot possibly overlap.
                return false;
            }
        }

        // There was no dimension along which there is no intersection.
        // Therefore the boxes overlap.
        return true;
    }


    /** Updates the axes after the corners move.  Assumes the
        corners actually form a rectangle. */
    void computeAxes() {
        axis[0] = corner[1] - corner[0]; 
        axis[1] = corner[3] - corner[0]; 

        // Make the length of each axis 1/edge length so we know any
        // dot product must be less than 1 to fall within the edge.

        for (int a = 0; a < 2; ++a) {
            axis[a] /= axis[a].squaredLength();
            origin[a] = corner[0].dot(axis[a]);
        }
    }

public:

    OBB2D(const Vector2& center, const double w, const double h, double angle)
{
        Vector2 X( cos(angle), sin(angle));
        Vector2 Y(-sin(angle), cos(angle));

        X *= w / 2;
        Y *= h / 2;

        corner[0] = center - X - Y;
        corner[1] = center + X - Y;
        corner[2] = center + X + Y;
        corner[3] = center - X + Y;

        computeAxes();
    }


    /** For testing purposes. */
    void moveTo(const Vector2& center) {
        Vector2 centroid = (corner[0] + corner[1] + corner[2] + corner[3]) / 4;

        Vector2 translation = center - centroid;

        for (int c = 0; c < 4; ++c) {
            corner[c] += translation;
        }

        computeAxes();
    }

    /** Returns true if the intersection of the boxes is non-empty. */
    bool overlaps(const OBB2D& other) const {
        return overlaps1Way(other) && other.overlaps1Way(*this);
    }

    void render() const {
        glBegin(GL_LINES);
            for (int c = 0; c < 5; ++c) {
              glVertex2fv(corner[c & 3]);
            }
        glEnd();
    }
};


  • 0
    点赞
  • 0
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值