Note: 旧的wordpress博客弃用,于是将以前的笔记搬运回来。
Question:
Prove that the union of two subspaces of
V
V
V is a subspace of
V
V
V if and only if one of the subspaces of
V
V
V is contained in the other.
证明V的两个子空间的并是B的子空间当且仅当其中一个子空间包含领一个子空间。
Solution:
Assume two set A, B are subspaces of
V
V
V.
Part 1:
Assume
A
∪
B
=
A
A \cup B = A
A∪B=A or
B
B
B.
Clearly
A
∪
B
=
A
A \cup B = A
A∪B=A or
B
∈
V
B \in V
B∈V.
Therefor if one subspace of
V
V
V is contained in the other, the union of two subspaces is a subspace of
V
V
V.
Part 2:
Assume
A
∪
B
≠
A
A \cup B \neq A
A∪B=A or
B
B
B.
Now we take
a
∈
A
a \in A
a∈A but not in
B
B
B, and
b
∈
B
b \in B
b∈B but not in
A
A
A.
Since
a
∈
A
a \in A
a∈A, we know
−
a
∈
A
-a \in A
−a∈A.
Assume
a
+
b
∈
A
a + b \in A
a+b∈A.
As we know,
A
A
A is a subspace of
V
V
V. So
A
A
A is closed under addition.
Therefor,
(
a
+
b
)
+
(
−
a
)
(a + b) + (-a)
(a+b)+(−a) should be in A.
But in fact,
(
a
+
b
)
+
(
−
a
)
=
b
(a + b) + (-a) = b
(a+b)+(−a)=b. We have assumed that
b
∉
A
b \notin A
b∈/A. We have reached a contradiction on the assumption that
a
+
b
∈
A
a + b \in A
a+b∈A. Thus
a
+
b
∉
A
a + b \notin A
a+b∈/A.
If we assume
a
+
b
∈
B
a + b \in B
a+b∈B, we will also reach a contradiction like this.
Therefor,
a
+
b
a + b
a+b is not in A and B.
i.e.
a
+
b
∉
A
∪
B
a + b \notin A \cup B
a+b∈/A∪B.
Then the set
A
∪
B
A \cup B
A∪B isn’t closed under addition.
Therefor if
A
∪
B
≠
A
A \cup B \neq A
A∪B=A or
B
B
B,
A
∪
B
A \cup B
A∪B is not a subspace of V.
Now we have proved that the union of two subspaces of
V
V
V is a subspace of
V
V
V if and only if one of the subspaces of
V
V
V is contained in the other.