【归档】证明V的两个子空间的并是V的子空间当且仅当其中一个子空间包含另一个子空间

Note: 旧的wordpress博客弃用,于是将以前的笔记搬运回来。


Question:
Prove that the union of two subspaces of V V V is a subspace of V V V if and only if one of the subspaces of V V V is contained in the other.
证明V的两个子空间的并是B的子空间当且仅当其中一个子空间包含领一个子空间。
Solution:
Assume two set A, B are subspaces of V V V.
Part 1:
Assume A ∪ B = A A \cup B = A AB=A or B B B.
Clearly A ∪ B = A A \cup B = A AB=A or B ∈ V B \in V BV.
Therefor if one subspace of V V V is contained in the other, the union of two subspaces is a subspace of V V V.
Part 2:
Assume A ∪ B ≠ A A \cup B \neq A AB=A or B B B.
Now we take a ∈ A a \in A aA but not in B B B, and b ∈ B b \in B bB but not in A A A.
Since a ∈ A a \in A aA, we know − a ∈ A -a \in A aA.
Assume a + b ∈ A a + b \in A a+bA.
As we know, A A A is a subspace of V V V. So A A A is closed under addition.
Therefor, ( a + b ) + ( − a ) (a + b) + (-a) (a+b)+(a) should be in A.
But in fact, ( a + b ) + ( − a ) = b (a + b) + (-a) = b (a+b)+(a)=b. We have assumed that b ∉ A b \notin A b/A. We have reached a contradiction on the assumption that a + b ∈ A a + b \in A a+bA. Thus a + b ∉ A a + b \notin A a+b/A.
If we assume a + b ∈ B a + b \in B a+bB, we will also reach a contradiction like this.
Therefor, a + b a + b a+b is not in A and B.
i.e. a + b ∉ A ∪ B a + b \notin A \cup B a+b/AB.
Then the set A ∪ B A \cup B AB isn’t closed under addition.
Therefor if A ∪ B ≠ A A \cup B \neq A AB=A or B B B, A ∪ B A \cup B AB is not a subspace of V.
Now we have proved that the union of two subspaces of V V V is a subspace of V V V if and only if one of the subspaces of V V V is contained in the other.

  • 0
    点赞
  • 3
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 0
    评论

“相关推荐”对你有帮助么?

  • 非常没帮助
  • 没帮助
  • 一般
  • 有帮助
  • 非常有帮助
提交
评论
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值