贴图比较：DDS vs TGA vs PNG

最新推荐文章于 2022-09-06 17:54:49 发布

玄冬Wong

最新推荐文章于 2022-09-06 17:54:49 发布

阅读量3k

点赞数

分类专栏： 3D 文章标签： Texture

本文链接：https://blog.csdn.net/wag2765/article/details/84766267

版权

本文探讨了在游戏开发中选择纹理格式的问题，重点比较了DDS、TGA和PNG三种格式的优缺点。作者偏爱无损且支持MIP映射的格式，最终结论是，PNG适合开发和原始文件，对于单位的团队颜色，推荐使用DDS(DXT3)，而特征、地图和无团队颜色的单位则推荐DDS(DXT1)。对于高分辨率工作流程，建议使用PNG并用批处理工具如The Compressonator转换为DDS格式。

摘要由CSDN通过智能技术生成

原文：https://springrts.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=18231

I can see this debate has raged awhile and opinions differ but I'm having trouble working out the factual information from the opinions and out-of-date stuff. Basically I'm at the start of my mod work and I want to use the "best" texture format going forward.

I'd prefer the format not be lossy and to be capable of mip-mapping. It would be good for it to have good performance on game start and during the game. It should also be reasonable easy to load in image software. I know I can't have everything but my preference would be for performance over other concerns (I'll be running games with very high unit counts).

My preferred format is currently PNG, but I was wondering if anyone could shed some light on the matter as far as the current engine goes.

PNG (32bit) / TIFF
Lossless
Very good compression (use LZW or Deflate for Tiff)
Excellent image software support
No embedded mip-maps

TGA