斯科特·汉塞尔曼（Scott Hanselman），MC *。*，良好的SAT，AS，几乎是BS，3位智商，等等等等……...

Dear Blog,

亲爱的博客：

Lately I've noticed a lot of people (no names, you know who you are) who are Microsoft Technologists writing articles, blogging, emailing, and suffixing their names like "Joe Blow - MCAD, MCSD, MCDBA, MCT, MCSE."  Is this really necessary?  Is it really informative?  Isn't it like "Joe Blow - I know my shit so step lively!"  Is it better to see all these certifications or would you rather see "Joe Blow - BS CS, MS CS, MBA, 1400 SATs, 158 IQ."  I have a great friend in Boston who's team is arguably the most certified on the planet.  It became a game for them.  For a while in 2000, one of his guys had passed every test MS offered. Sure, I'm MS Certified up the wazoo, who isn't?  Is/are certification(s) going to ship my product on time?  Will my product, written by an MCSD, scale to 20,000 concurrent users?  Is my SQL Server database, written by a MCDBA, indexed appropriately?  Certifications aside people...ship software.  Shrinkwrap it and sell it.  Run successful projects and deliver on time and under budget.  Enjoy your work and teach others.

最近，我注意到很多人(没有名字，你知道你是谁)是Microsoft技术专家，他们在撰写文章，写博客，通过电子邮件发送电子邮件，并在其后缀上加上“ Joe Blow-MCAD，MCSD，MCDBA，MCT，MCSE”之类的名字。 这真的有必要吗？ 真的有用吗？ 是不是像“ Joe Blow-我知道我的狗屎这么活泼！ ”是看所有这些证书还是更好的？或者您宁愿看到“ Joe Blow-BS CS，MS CS，MBA，1400 SAT，158 IQ”。我在波士顿有一个好朋友，他的团队可以说是这个星球上获得最多认证的人。 对他们来说，这成了一场比赛。 在2000年的一段时间里，他的一个家伙通过了MS提供的所有测试。 当然，我通过了MS认证，而且不是吗？ 认证会按时发货吗？ 我的产品(由MCSD编写)能否扩展到20,000个并发用户？ 我的由MCDBA编写SQL Server数据库是否已正确索引？ 除了人员认证...运输软件。 拆包出售。 运行成功的项目，并在预算内按时交付。 享受您的工作并教别人。

Signed,Scott Hanselman, MC*.*

签名， Scott Hanselman，MC *。*

翻译自: https://www.hanselman.com/blog/scott-hanselman-mc-good-sats-as-almost-bs-3-digit-iq-blah-blah-blah