YOLOV3/ YOLOV4/Centernet 指标比较

COCO数据集合,1080Ti:

 

yolov3

yolo4

centernet
fpsapfpsapfpsap
203343432841

 

yolov4:自己数据集合测试结果:5000 valid数据,其中包括BDD80%,自采数据20%。

./darknet detector map data/whl_yolov4.data cfg/cfgs_whl/yolov4-custom.cfg backup/yolov4-custom_last.weight
class_id = 0, name = car, ap = 70.56%        (TP = 31806, FP = 12516)
class_id = 1, name = bus, ap = 55.24%        (TP = 495, FP = 343)
class_id = 2, name = person, ap = 54.52%        (TP = 3196, FP = 1246)
class_id = 3, name = bike, ap = 36.33%        (TP = 152, FP = 146)
class_id = 4, name = truck, ap = 54.24%        (TP = 858, FP = 583)
class_id = 5, name = motor, ap = 30.69%        (TP = 54, FP = 76)
class_id = 6, name = train, ap = 0.00%        (TP = 0, FP = 0)
class_id = 7, name = rider, ap = 40.53%        (TP = 148, FP = 145)
class_id = 8, name = sign, ap = 61.68%        (TP = 10482, FP = 4970)
class_id = 9, name = Red, ap = 73.51%        (TP = 459, FP = 251)
class_id = 10, name = Green, ap = 78.14%        (TP = 525, FP = 169)
class_id = 11, name = Yellow, ap = 60.27%        (TP = 17, FP = 1)
class_id = 12, name = Off, ap = 33.26%        (TP = 35, FP = 37)
class_id = 13, name = GreenHorizontal, ap = 0.00%        (TP = 0, FP = 0)
class_id = 14, name = RedHorizontal, ap = 0.00%        (TP = 0, FP = 0)
class_id = 15, name = YellowHorizontal, ap = 0.00%        (TP = 0, FP = 0)
class_id = 16, name = GreenLeft, ap = 50.39%        (TP = 16, FP = 13)
class_id = 17, name = RedLeft, ap = 64.29%        (TP = 106, FP = 80)
class_id = 18, name = YellowLeft, ap = 0.00%        (TP = 0, FP = 0)
class_id = 19, name = GreenRight, ap = 0.00%        (TP = 0, FP = 0)
class_id = 20, name = RedRight, ap = 0.00%        (TP = 0, FP = 0)
class_id = 21, name = YellowRight, ap = 0.00%        (TP = 0, FP = 0)
class_id = 22, name = GreenTurn, ap = 67.51%        (TP = 14, FP = 6)
class_id = 23, name = RedTurn, ap = 41.25%        (TP = 19, FP = 18)
class_id = 24, name = YellowTurn, ap = 0.00%        (TP = 0, FP = 0)
class_id = 25, name = Cone, ap = 65.88%        (TP = 142, FP = 62)
class_id = 26, name = TriangleWarningSign, ap = 21.08%        (TP = 0, FP = 1)

 for conf_thresh = 0.25, precision = 0.70, recall = 0.65, F1-score = 0.68
 for conf_thresh = 0.25, TP = 48524, FP = 20663, FN = 26059, average IoU = 54.38 %

 IoU threshold = 50 %, used Area-Under-Curve for each unique Recall
 mean average precision (mAP@0.50) = 0.355323, or 35.53 %

 

 

  • 3
    点赞
  • 4
    收藏
    觉得还不错? 一键收藏
  • 6
    评论
CenterNet和YOLOv8都是目标检测算法中比较知名的方法,它们都是实时物体检测框架,但有一些关键的区别: 1. **定位方式**: - CenterNet: 它主要基于中心点检测的思想,先预测每个目标的中心位置和大小,然后在其周围区域进行细化,这使得它可以同时输出类别概率。它使用了特征金字塔网络(FPN)和中心卷积等技术来提高精度。 - YOLOv8: YOLO(You Only Look Once)系列算法,包括YOLOv8,主要采用网格细胞进行预测,每个网格会预测该区域内存在目标的概率以及类别和边界框信息。 2. **框型输出**: - YOLOv8: 直接预测边界框,输出是预先定义好的网格单元格的多个候选框,每个候选框包含了类别、位置和置信度信息。 - CenterNet: 中心点检测需要额外的步骤来生成最终的边界框,通常是通过中心点扩展或回归方法。 3. **速度与精度**: - YOLOv8:作为YOLO系列的后续版本,YOLOv8在保持高精度的同时,通常具有更高的实时性能,因为它减少了计算量和模型复杂度。 - CenterNet:由于其预测机制,可能会稍微慢一些,但中心点检测策略在某些场景下可能带来更好的性能,尤其是在行人检测等对中心位置敏感的任务上。 4. **更新频率**: - YOLOv8: 在YOLO系列中,YOLOv8是对前一代YOLov7的一个改进版本,意味着它是在不断迭代和优化的基础上发布的。 - CenterNet: 相比之下,虽然CenterNet也有后续版本如CenterNet-Human,但更新频率可能没有YOLO那样频繁。 **相关问题--:** 1. CenterNet相对于YOLOv8在处理哪些特定类型的物体检测任务上有优势? 2. 在实际应用中,考虑到速度和精度的权衡,你会倾向于选择哪一种算法? 3. CenterNet是如何通过中心点预测来优化目标检测准确性的?
评论 6
添加红包

请填写红包祝福语或标题

红包个数最小为10个

红包金额最低5元

当前余额3.43前往充值 >
需支付:10.00
成就一亿技术人!
领取后你会自动成为博主和红包主的粉丝 规则
hope_wisdom
发出的红包
实付
使用余额支付
点击重新获取
扫码支付
钱包余额 0

抵扣说明:

1.余额是钱包充值的虚拟货币,按照1:1的比例进行支付金额的抵扣。
2.余额无法直接购买下载,可以购买VIP、付费专栏及课程。

余额充值