unity未探索区域迷雾_Unity的探索性测试

unity未探索区域迷雾

Hello everybody, my name is Claus Petersen and I am a fairly recent addition to the Unity family. I am in charge of leading the Software Test Engineers in QA.

大家好，我叫克劳斯·彼得森，我是Unity家族的新成员。 我负责领导质量检查部门的软件测试工程师 。

Last week I finished reading the book ‘Exploratory Software Testing’ by James Whittaker. Not coincidentally at the same time we concluded the first round of exploratory testing (E.T.) sessions that I have been a part of here at Unity. I thought I would share my thoughts on the book as well as our current and future use of the E.T. *Spoiler Alert* … We have not seen the last of E.T. at Unity.

上周，我读完了詹姆斯·惠特克(James Whittaker)的《探索性软件测试》一书。 我们恰巧结束了我参加Unity的第一轮探索性测试(ET)会议，这并非偶然。 我想分享一下我对本书的想法，以及我们当前和将来使用ET * Spoiler Alert *的想法。。。

If you are interested in software testing and haven’t read the book, I encourage you to do so. It’s a relatively quick and easy read and even though the chapters vary greatly in usefulness, it’s never less than interesting.

如果您对软件测试感兴趣并且还没有读过这本书，那么我建议您这样做。 这是一个相对快速且容易阅读的内容，即使各章的实用性差异很大，也从来不会比它有趣。

The first two chapters – ‘The Magic of Software’ and ‘The Case for Manual Testing’ seem to be aimed at either novice testers getting into the craft or developers who believe that processes, engineering practices, defect prevention and automated testing (while all excellent) have or will make manual testing obsolete. James presents at least one damning evidence to the contrary – Windows Vista – and the fact that he worked at Microsoft during the development of Vista leads credence to his case.

前两章“软件的魔力”和“手动测试的案例”似乎是针对新手测试人员或相信流程，工程实践，缺陷预防和自动化测试的开发人员(尽管它们都很出色)。 )已经或将使手动测试过时。 詹姆斯提出了至少一个与此相反的令人震惊的证据-Windows Vista-并且他在Vista的开发过程中曾在Micros