论文Conclusions不会写？AI一键总结，高效又精准！

论文Conclusion部分，是论文正文最后一部分。

摘要和Conclusions都是对论文主要结果和意义的总结，两者有什么异同之处呢？           

1 内容组成不同：

摘要分为“研究背景-研究方法和研究结果-研究意义”。Conclusions结论部分不需要陈述研究背景，开门见山直接总结方法和结果，方法也不需要很详细，简略带过即可。最后都是以点明研究意义结尾。           

2 对结果的陈述有区别：

摘要部分对结果的陈述除了得出具体结论，中间的数据展示也很重要，研究人群数量，结果数据、统计学差异数据等都要展示；Conclusions结论部分则侧重结论的陈述和总结，细节的数据可不用在重复，人群数据、分组数据更是不需要再结论部分展示。           

娜姐见过不少同学，不会写还是想偷懒，直接把摘要中的句子复制粘贴，在Conclusion部分再重复一遍，这是万万不可取的。即使是陈述同样的结果，也要换一种说法。           

不想写或者不会写，让AI帮你总结，它行啊！

               

最近学员群的同学又提了让AI一键总结Conlcusions的需求：

           

娜姐尝试对比了好几个模型，然后又进一步优化提示词。得出结论：还是Claude总结的最好。最后调试出来的效果如下：      

原文“Need for inpatient rehabilitation and skilled nursing services in COVID-19 patients post hospitalization: a retrospective cohort study”结论部分如下：

This study reports the number of patients admitted from home who needed discharge to a facility for inpatient rehabilitation/nursing services post-hospitalization for COVID-19. The information regarding utilization of these services can assist further research on appropriate resource allocation for future pandemic preparedness. Older patients, males and those with a longer hospital stay, along with the patients who needed a new PEG tube, tracheostomy, initiation of hemodialysis or CRRT, or had an acute stroke during the admission were more likely to require inpatient skilled services warranting discharge to a facility post-hospitalization. These findings can facilitate efficient discharge planning and help optimize the long-term care of COVID-19 survivors.    

标红部分的关键结论Claude精准总结出来了。我甚至觉得Claude写的更好一点。

           

再来测试一篇，看看提示词是否表现稳定：

原文“H1 and H2 antihistamines pretreatment for attenuation of protamine reactions after cardiopulmonary bypass: a randomized-controlled study”：

Conclusions：

In conclusion, pretreatment with H1 and H2 antihistamines does not attenuate blood pressure responses to protamine administration in patients after CPB. Moreover, none of the patients in our study had significant elevation in serial serum tryptase levels, thus suggesting that it is not common for protamine administration to cause systemic mast cell degranulation and histamine release in patients without allergy. Other mechanisms might be responsible for protamine-induced cardiovascular changes after protamine administration.

Claude写的：    

主要结论总结很精准，研究意义写的也很恰当。           

当然，如果你的论文Conclusions部分风格不是这样一段式的，提示词也能适配来写。