3-Integration of the Evolution Equation
3.1 Operator split : isotropic
- Evolution eqn:
− 1 2 L v b e ⋅ b e − 1 = V − 1 : τ N E Q \begin{aligned} \boxed{-\frac{1}{2}\mathscr L_vb_e\cdot b_e^{-1}=\mathscr V^{-1}:\tau_{NEQ}} \end{aligned} −21Lvbe⋅be−1=V−1:τNEQ
- rewrite it as the potential form:
− 1 2 L v b e ⋅ b e − 1 = 1 τ ∂ ∂ τ N E Q ( τ 2 τ N E Q : V − 1 : τ N E Q ) = 1 τ ∂ Φ v i s ∂ τ N E Q \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} -\frac{1}{2}\mathscr L_vb_e\cdot b_e^{-1}=\frac{1}{\tau}\frac{\partial }{\partial \tau_{NEQ}}(\frac{\tau}{2}\tau_{NEQ}:\mathscr V^{-1}:\tau_{NEQ}) = \frac{1}{\tau}\frac{\partial \Phi_{vis}}{\partial \tau_{NEQ}} \end{aligned} \end{equation} −21Lvbe⋅be−1=τ1∂τNEQ∂(2ττNEQ:V−1:τNEQ)=τ1∂τNEQ∂Φvis
- Φ v i s \Phi_{vis} Φvis: interpreted as creep potential
- Algorithm of the integration of evolution equations
- The main features of algorithms is to carry out an operator split of material derivative of b e b_e be into an elastic predictor E E E and an inelastic corrector I I I:
b ˙ e = ( F ⋅ C i − 1 ⋅ F T ) ‾ ˙ = F ˙ F i − 1 F i − T F T + F ( C i − 1 ) ‾ ˙ F T + F F i − 1 F i − T F ˙ T = F ˙ F − 1 F e F e T F − T F T + F F − 1 F e F e T F − T F ˙ T + F ( C i − 1 ) ‾ ˙ F T = l b e + b e l + F ( C i − 1 ) ‾ ˙ F T \begin{aligned} \dot b_e &= \dot {\overline{(F\cdot C_i^{-1}\cdot F^T)}} \\ & = \dot FF_i^{-1}F_i^{-T}F^T+F\dot{\overline{(C_i^{-1})}}F^T+FF_i^{-1}F_i^{-T}\dot F^T \\ & = \dot FF^{-1}F_eF_e^TF^{-T}F^T+FF^{-1}F_eF_e^TF^{-T}\dot F^T+F\dot{\overline{(C_i^{-1})}}F^T \\ & = lb_e+b_el+F\dot{\overline{(C_i^{-1})}}F^T \end{aligned} b˙e=(F⋅Ci−1⋅FT)˙=F˙Fi−1Fi−TFT+F(Ci−1)˙FT+FFi−1Fi−TF˙T=F˙F−1FeFeTF−TFT+FF−1FeFeTF−TF˙T+F(Ci−1)˙FT=lbe+bel+F(Ci−1)˙FT
b ˙ e = l ⋅ b e + b e ⋅ l ⏟ E + F ⋅ ( C i − 1 ) ‾ ˙ ⋅ F T ⏟ I \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} \dot b_e = \underbrace{l\cdot b_e+b_e\cdot l}_{E}+\underbrace{F\cdot \dot{\overline{(C_i^{-1})}}\cdot F^T}_{I} \end{aligned} \end{equation} b˙e=E l⋅be+be⋅l+I F⋅(Ci−1)˙⋅FT
In elastic predictor step the material time derivative of C i − 1 C_i^{-1} Ci−1 is set to zero
( C i − 1 ) t r i a l = ( C i − 1 ) t = t n − 1 ⇒ ( b e ) t r i a l = ( F ) t = t n ⋅ ( C i − 1 ) t = t n − 1 ⋅ ( F ) t = t n T \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} (C_i^{-1})_{trial}=(C_i^{-1})_{t=t_{n-1}}\Rightarrow (b_e)_{trial} = (F)_{t =t_n}\cdot (C_i^{-1})_{t=t_{n-1}}\cdot (F)_{t=t_n}^T \end{aligned} \end{equation} (Ci−1)trial=(Ci−1)t=tn−1⇒(be)trial=(F)t=tn⋅(Ci−1)t=tn−1⋅(F)t=tnT
- Analogy to elastoplasticity, the state calculated with the elastic predictor step is called the trial state
In inelastic corrector step, the spatial velocity gradient l l l is set to zero, leads L v b e = b ˙ e \mathscr L_vb_e = \dot b_e Lvbe=b˙e
by:
b
˙
e
=
F
⋅
(
C
i
−
1
)
‾
˙
⋅
F
T
⏟
I
=
L
v
b
e
\dot b_e = \underbrace{F\cdot \dot{\overline{(C_i^{-1})}}\cdot F^T}_{I} = \mathscr L_vb_e
b˙e=I
F⋅(Ci−1)˙⋅FT=Lvbe
L v b e = b ˙ e \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} \mathscr L_vb_e = \dot b_e \end{aligned} \end{equation} Lvbe=b˙e
by:
−
1
2
L
v
b
e
⋅
b
e
−
1
=
V
−
1
:
τ
N
E
Q
\begin{aligned} -\frac{1}{2}\mathscr L_vb_e\cdot b_e^{-1}=\mathscr V^{-1}:\tau_{NEQ} \end{aligned}
−21Lvbe⋅be−1=V−1:τNEQ
b ˙ e = − ( 2 V − 1 : τ N E Q ) ⋅ b e \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} \dot b_e=-(2\mathscr V^{-1}:\tau_{NEQ})\cdot b_e \end{aligned} \end{equation} b˙e=−(2V−1:τNEQ)⋅be
- Solving the differential equation by exponential mapping:
b e = exp [ − 2 ∫ t n − 1 t V − 1 : τ N E Q d t ] ⋅ b e \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} b_e = \exp{[-2\int_{t_{n-1}}^t\mathscr V^{-1}:\tau_{NEQ}dt]}\cdot b_e \end{aligned} \end{equation} be=exp[−2∫tn−1tV−1:τNEQdt]⋅be
( b e ) t = t n ≈ exp [ − 2 ( t n − t n − 1 ) ⏟ Δ t ( V − 1 : τ N E Q ) t = t n ] ⋅ ( b e ) t r i a l \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} (b_e)_{t=t_n} \approx \exp{[-2\underbrace{(t_n-t_{n-1})}_{\Delta t}(\mathscr V^{-1}:\tau_{NEQ})_{t=t_n}]}\cdot (b_e)_{trial} \end{aligned} \end{equation} (be)t=tn≈exp[−2Δt (tn−tn−1)(V−1:τNEQ)t=tn]⋅(be)trial
- approximate expression is first order accurate
For isotropy case
- τ N E Q \tau_{NEQ} τNEQ is commutes with b e b_e be and also with ( b e ) t r i a l (b_e)_{trial} (be)trial
- Prove b e b_e be and ( b e ) t r i a l (b_e)_{trial} (be)trial share the same set of eigenvectors in the case of isotropy
- Note that:
b e = exp [ − 2 Δ t V − 1 : τ N E Q ] ⏟ a ⋅ ( b e ) t r i a l \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} b_e = \underbrace{\exp{[-2\Delta t\mathscr V^{-1}:\tau_{NEQ}]}}_{\mathsf a}\cdot (b_e)_{trial} \end{aligned} \end{equation} be=a exp[−2ΔtV−1:τNEQ]⋅(be)trial
- By assumption of isotropy of Ψ N E Q \Psi_{NEQ} ΨNEQ that τ N E Q \tau_{NEQ} τNEQ has the same eigenspace as b e b_e be , (isotropic tensor function representation theorem)
- Since V − 1 \mathscr V^{-1} V−1 is isotropic, V − 1 : τ N E Q \mathscr V^{-1}:\tau_{NEQ} V−1:τNEQ shares the same eigenspace as b e b_e be
- a \mathsf a a has the same Eigen space as b e b_e be
- Because of the properties of exponential map on symmetric tensor, the existence of inverse of a \mathsf a a is guaranteed
a − 1 ⋅ b e = ( b e ) t r i a l \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} \mathsf a^{-1}\cdot b_e = (b_e)_{trial} \end{aligned} \end{equation} a−1⋅be=(be)trial
- a − 1 ⋅ b e \mathsf a^{-1}\cdot b_e a−1⋅be and b e b_e be shares the same eigenspace
- Thus, b e b_e be and ( b e ) t r i a l (b_e)_{trial} (be)trial shares the same eigenspace
- Solve (8) in terms of principal values, finite viscoelastic evolution is:
by:
V − 1 = 1 2 η D ( 1 4 − 1 3 1 ⊗ 1 ) + 1 9 η V 1 ⊗ 1 V − 1 : τ N E Q = 1 2 η D d e v [ τ N E Q ] + 1 9 η V τ N E Q : 1 \mathscr V^{-1}=\frac{1}{2\eta_D}(\textbf 1^4-\frac{1}{3}\textbf 1\otimes \textbf1)+\frac{1}{9\eta_V}\textbf 1\otimes \textbf 1 \\ \quad \\ \mathscr V^{-1} : \tau_{NEQ} = \frac{1}{2\eta_D}dev[\tau_{NEQ}]+\frac{1}{9\eta_V}\tau_{NEQ}: \textbf 1 V−1=2ηD1(14−311⊗1)+9ηV11⊗1V−1:τNEQ=2ηD1dev[τNEQ]+9ηV1τNEQ:1
λ A e 2 = exp [ − Δ t ( 1 η D d e v [ τ A ] + 2 9 η V τ N E Q : 1 ) ] ( λ A e 2 ) t r i a l \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} \lambda_{Ae}^2=\exp{[-\Delta t(\frac{1}{\eta_D}dev[\tau_{A}]+\frac{2}{9\eta_V}\tau_{NEQ}: \textbf 1)]} (\lambda_{Ae}^2)_{trial} \end{aligned} \end{equation} λAe2=exp[−Δt(ηD1dev[τA]+9ηV2τNEQ:1)](λAe2)trial
- d e v [ τ A ] dev[\tau_{A}] dev[τA] are the principal values of d e v [ τ N E Q ] dev[\tau_{NEQ}] dev[τNEQ]
- λ A e 2 \lambda_{Ae}^2 λAe2 are the principal values of ( b e ) t = t n (b_e)_{t=t_n} (be)t=tn
- ( λ A e 2 ) t r i a l (\lambda_{Ae}^2)_{trial} (λAe2)trial are the principal values of ( b e ) t r i a l (b_e)_{trial} (be)trial
- Take the Logarithm of both sides:
ε A e = − Δ t ( 1 2 η D d e v [ τ A ] + 1 9 η V τ N E Q : 1 ) + ( ε A e ) t r i a l \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} \boxed{\varepsilon_{Ae}=-\Delta t(\frac{1}{2\eta_D}dev[\tau_{A}]+\frac{1}{9\eta_V}\tau_{NEQ}: \textbf 1)+(\varepsilon_{Ae})_{trial}} \end{aligned} \end{equation} εAe=−Δt(2ηD1dev[τA]+9ηV1τNEQ:1)+(εAe)trial
- ε A e = ln λ A e 2 \varepsilon_{Ae} = \ln \lambda_{Ae}^2 εAe=lnλAe2 : are the elastic logarithmic principal stretches
- (11) furnishes an implicit nonlinear equation for determining the principal values of b e b_e be
3.2 Linearized case
− 1 2 ( L v b e ⋅ b e − 1 ) l i n = 1 2 τ ( b e − 1 ) \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} \boxed{-\frac{1}{2}(\mathscr L_vb_e\cdot b_e^{-1})_{lin} = \frac{1}{2\tau}(b_e-1)} \end{aligned} \end{equation} −21(Lvbe⋅be−1)lin=2τ1(be−1)
- in inelastic corrector step: L v b e = b ˙ e \mathscr L_vb_e = \dot b_e Lvbe=b˙e
b ˙ e = − 1 τ ( b e − 1 ) ⋅ b e \dot b_e=-\frac{1}{\tau}(b_e-1)\cdot b_e b˙e=−τ1(be−1)⋅be
- Solving the differential equation by exponential mapping:
b e = exp [ − 1 τ ∫ t n − 1 t ( b e − 1 ) d t ] ⋅ ( b e ) t r i a l ( b e ) t = t n ≈ exp [ − 1 τ ( t n − t n − 1 ) ⏟ Δ t ( ( b e ) t = t n − 1 ) ] ⋅ ( b e ) t r i a l b_e = \exp [-\frac{1}{\tau}\int_{t_{n-1}}^t(b_e-1)dt] \cdot (b_e)_{trial} \\ \quad \\ (b_e)_{t=t_n} \approx \exp [-\frac{1}{\tau}\underbrace{(t_n-t_{n-1})}_{\Delta t}((b_e)_{t=t_n}-1)]\cdot (b_e)_{trial} be=exp[−τ1∫tn−1t(be−1)dt]⋅(be)trial(be)t=tn≈exp[−τ1Δt (tn−tn−1)((be)t=tn−1)]⋅(be)trial
- For isotropic case
λ A e 2 = exp [ − Δ t τ ( λ A e 2 − 1 ) ] ( λ A e 2 ) t r i a l \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} \lambda_{Ae}^2=\exp[-\frac{\Delta t}{\tau}(\lambda_{Ae}^2-1)](\lambda_{Ae}^2)_{trial} \end{aligned} \end{equation} λAe2=exp[−τΔt(λAe2−1)](λAe2)trial
- hence:
ε A e = − Δ t τ 1 2 ( λ A e 2 − 1 ) + ( ε A e ) t r i a l \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} \varepsilon_{Ae}=-\frac{\Delta t}{\tau}\frac{1}{2}(\lambda_{Ae}^2-1)+(\varepsilon_{Ae})_{trial} \end{aligned} \end{equation} εAe=−τΔt21(λAe2−1)+(εAe)trial
- linearizes ε A e = ln λ A e \varepsilon_{Ae} = \ln \lambda_{Ae} εAe=lnλAe with respect to λ A e 2 \lambda_{Ae}^2 λAe2 around thermodynamic equilibrium λ A e 2 = 1 \lambda_{Ae}^2=1 λAe2=1:
( ε A e ) l i n = [ ∂ ( ln λ A e ) ∂ ( λ A e 2 ) ] E Q ( λ A e 2 − 1 ) = [ ∂ ( 1 2 ln λ A e 2 ) ∂ ( λ A e 2 ) ] E Q ( λ A e 2 − 1 ) = [ 1 2 1 λ A e 2 ] λ A e 2 = 1 ( λ A e 2 − 1 ) = 1 2 ( λ A e 2 − 1 ) \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} (\varepsilon_{Ae})_{lin} &= [\frac{\partial (\ln \lambda_{Ae})}{\partial (\lambda _{Ae}^2)}]_{EQ}(\lambda_{Ae}^2-1) \\ & = [\frac{\partial (\frac{1}{2}\ln \lambda_{Ae}^2)}{\partial (\lambda _{Ae}^2)}]_{EQ}(\lambda_{Ae}^2-1) \\ & = [\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{\lambda_{Ae}^2}]_{\lambda_{Ae}^2=1}(\lambda_{Ae}^2-1) \\ & = \frac{1}{2}(\lambda_{Ae}^2-1) \end{aligned} \end{equation} (εAe)lin=[∂(λAe2)∂(lnλAe)]EQ(λAe2−1)=[∂(λAe2)∂(21lnλAe2)]EQ(λAe2−1)=[21λAe21]λAe2=1(λAe2−1)=21(λAe2−1)
- evolution equation (12) is valid for small perturbation away from thermodynamic equilibrium, no restriction for (15)
- substitue (15) into (14):
ε A e = − Δ t τ ε A e + ( ε A e ) t r i a l \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} \boxed{\varepsilon_{Ae} = -\frac{\Delta t}{\tau}\varepsilon _{Ae}+(\varepsilon_{Ae})_{trial}} \end{aligned} \end{equation} εAe=−τΔtεAe+(εAe)trial
- Solving for ε A e \varepsilon_{Ae} εAe:
ε A e = ( 1 + Δ t τ ) − 1 ( ε A e ) t r i a l \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} \varepsilon_{Ae} = (1+\frac{\Delta t}{\tau})^{-1}(\varepsilon_{Ae})_{trial} \end{aligned} \end{equation} εAe=(1+τΔt)−1(εAe)trial
- is explicit update formula for the logarithmic principal values of b e b_e be
3.3 Local Newton Iteration
for isotropic case
- non-equilibrium free energy Ψ N E Q \Psi_{NEQ} ΨNEQ can be represented as a function of principal values b A e = λ A e 2 b_{Ae}=\lambda_{Ae}^2 bAe=λAe2 of b e \mathbf b_e be:
Ψ N E Q = Ψ N E Q ( b 1 e , b 2 e , b 3 e ) \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} \Psi_{NEQ} = \Psi_{NEQ}(b_{1e},b_{2e}, b_{3e}) \end{aligned} \end{equation} ΨNEQ=ΨNEQ(b1e,b2e,b3e)
- Split the non-equilobrioum Kirchhoff stress tensor and the non-equilibrium part of free energy into volumetric and deviatoric parts:
Ψ N E Q = ( Ψ N E Q ) D ‾ ^ ( b ‾ 1 e , b ‾ 2 e , b ‾ 3 e ) + ( Ψ N E Q ) V ‾ ^ ( J e ) \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} \Psi_{NEQ} =\hat{\overline{(\Psi_{NEQ})_D}}(\overline b_{1e}, \overline b_{2e},\overline b_{3e})+\hat{\overline{(\Psi_{NEQ})_V}}(J_e) \end{aligned} \end{equation} ΨNEQ=(ΨNEQ)D^(b1e,b2e,b3e)+(ΨNEQ)V^(Je)
- Here, J e J_e Je denotes the determinant of F e F_e Fe:
J e = λ 1 e λ 2 e λ 3 e \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} J_e = \lambda_{1e}\lambda_{2e}\lambda_{3e} \end{aligned} \end{equation} Je=λ1eλ2eλ3e
- And the principal values of b ‾ e \overline b_e be:
b ‾ A e = J e − ( 2 / 3 ) b A e = J e − ( 2 / 3 ) λ A e 2 \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} \overline b_{Ae}=J_e^{-(2/3)}b_{Ae}=J_e^{-(2/3)}\lambda_{Ae}^2 \end{aligned} \end{equation} bAe=Je−(2/3)bAe=Je−(2/3)λAe2
- where:
b ‾ e = h e − ( 2 / 3 ) b e \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} \overline b_e = h_e^{-(2/3)}b_e \end{aligned} \end{equation} be=he−(2/3)be
Ogden Models
- Ψ N E Q \Psi_{NEQ} ΨNEQ split into the deviatoric and volumetric part :
Ψ N E Q = ∑ r = 1 3 ( μ m ) r ( α m ) r ( b ‾ 1 e ( α m ) r / 2 + b ‾ 2 e ( α m ) r / 2 + b ‾ 3 e ( α m ) r / 2 − 3 ) ⏟ ( Ψ N E Q ) D + K m 4 ( J e 2 − 2 ln J e − 1 ) ⏟ ( Ψ N E Q ) V \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} \Psi_{NEQ} = \underbrace{\sum_{r=1}^3 \frac{(\mu_m)_r}{(\alpha_m)_r}(\overline b_{1e}^{(\alpha_m)_r/2}+\overline b_{2e}^{(\alpha_m)_r/2}+\overline b_{3e}^{(\alpha_m)_r/2}-3)}_{(\Psi_{NEQ})_D}+\underbrace{\frac{K_m}{4}(J_e^2-2\ln J_e-1)}_{(\Psi_{NEQ})_V} \end{aligned} \end{equation} ΨNEQ=(ΨNEQ)D r=1∑3(αm)r(μm)r(b1e(αm)r/2+b2e(αm)r/2+b3e(αm)r/2−3)+(ΨNEQ)V 4Km(Je2−2lnJe−1)
- ( μ m ) r (\mu_m)_r (μm)r and ( α m ) r (\alpha_m)_r (αm)r are elasticity constant
- the shear modulus μ m \mu_m μm :
μ m = ∑ r = 1 3 1 2 ( μ m ) r ( α m ) r \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} \mu_m = \sum_{r = 1}^3\frac{1}{2}(\mu_m)_r(\alpha_m)_r \end{aligned} \end{equation} μm=r=1∑321(μm)r(αm)r
- For rubberlike material, we have K m ≈ 1000 ( μ m ) r K_m \approx 1000(\mu_m)_r Km≈1000(μm)r, which means that the material behavior is nearly incompressible
- Non-equilibrium part of the Kirchhoff stress tensor:
By:
A : ( u ⊗ v ) = u ⋅ A v = ( u ⊗ v ) : A A:(u\otimes v)=u\cdot Av=(u\otimes v):A A:(u⊗v)=u⋅Av=(u⊗v):A
d b e = d ( ∑ A = 1 3 λ A e 2 n A ⊗ n A ) = ∑ A = 1 3 ( 2 λ A e d λ A e n A ⊗ n A + λ A e 2 ( d n A ⊗ n A + n A ⊗ d n A ) ) ⇒ n A ⋅ d b e ⋅ n A = 2 λ A e d λ A e ∵ n A ⋅ d b e ⋅ n A = d b e : ( n A ⊗ n A ) ⇒ d b e : ( n A ⊗ n A ) = 2 λ A e d λ A e ⇒ ∂ b e ∂ λ A e d λ A e : ( n A ⊗ n A ) = 2 λ A e d λ A e ⇒ 1 2 λ A e ∂ b e ∂ λ A e : ( n A ⊗ n A ) = 1 ∵ 1 = ∂ b e ∂ λ A e : ∂ λ A e ∂ b e ⇒ ∂ λ A e ∂ b e = 1 2 λ A e ( n A ⊗ n A ) \begin{aligned} db_e &= d(\sum_{A=1}^3\lambda_{Ae}^2 n_A \otimes n_A) \\ &= \sum_{A=1}^3(2\lambda_{Ae}d\lambda_{Ae}n_A\otimes n_A+\lambda_{Ae}^2(dn_A\otimes n_A+n_A\otimes dn_A)) \\ \Rightarrow &n_A\cdot db_e \cdot n_A =2\lambda_{Ae}d\lambda_{Ae} \\ \because \ \ \ & n_A\cdot db_e\cdot n_A = db_e:(n_A\otimes n_A) \\ \Rightarrow & db_e:(n_A\otimes n_A) = 2\lambda_{Ae}d\lambda_{Ae} \\ \Rightarrow& \frac{\partial b_e}{\partial \lambda_{Ae}}d\lambda_{Ae}:(n_A\otimes n_A) = 2\lambda_{Ae}d\lambda_{Ae} \\ \Rightarrow & \frac{1}{2\lambda_{Ae}}\frac{\partial b_e}{\partial \lambda_{Ae}}:(n_A\otimes n_A) = 1 \\ \because \ \ \ & 1=\frac{\partial b_e}{\partial \lambda_{Ae}}:\frac{\partial \lambda_{Ae}}{\partial b_e} \\ \Rightarrow & \frac{\partial \lambda_{Ae}}{\partial b_e} = \frac{1}{2\lambda_{Ae}}(n_A \otimes n_A) \end{aligned} dbe⇒∵ ⇒⇒⇒∵ ⇒=d(A=1∑3λAe2nA⊗nA)=A=1∑3(2λAedλAenA⊗nA+λAe2(dnA⊗nA+nA⊗dnA))nA⋅dbe⋅nA=2λAedλAenA⋅dbe⋅nA=dbe:(nA⊗nA)dbe:(nA⊗nA)=2λAedλAe∂λAe∂bedλAe:(nA⊗nA)=2λAedλAe2λAe1∂λAe∂be:(nA⊗nA)=11=∂λAe∂be:∂be∂λAe∂be∂λAe=2λAe1(nA⊗nA)
τ N E Q = 2 ∂ Ψ N E Q ∂ b e ⋅ b e = 2 ∑ A = 1 3 ∂ Ψ N E Q ∂ λ A e ∂ λ A e ∂ b e ⋅ λ A e 2 n A ⊗ n A = 2 ∑ A = 1 3 ∂ Ψ N E Q ∂ λ A e 1 2 λ A e ( n A ⊗ n A ) ⋅ λ A e 2 n A ⊗ n A = ∑ A = 1 3 ∂ Ψ N E Q ∂ λ A e λ A e n A ⊗ n A = ∑ A = 1 3 τ A n A ⊗ n A \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} \tau_{NEQ} &= 2\frac{\partial \Psi_{NEQ}}{\partial b_e} \cdot b_e \\ &=2\sum_{A=1}^3\frac{\partial \Psi_{NEQ}}{\partial \lambda_{Ae}}\frac{\partial \lambda_{Ae}}{\partial b_e}\cdot \lambda_{Ae}^2 n_A \otimes n_A \\ & =2\sum_{A=1}^3\frac{\partial \Psi_{NEQ}}{\partial \lambda_{Ae}}\frac{1}{2\lambda_{Ae}}(n_A \otimes n_A)\cdot \lambda_{Ae}^2 n_A \otimes n_A \\ & =\sum_{A=1}^3\frac{\partial \Psi_{NEQ}}{\partial \lambda_{Ae}}\lambda_{Ae}n_A \otimes n_A \\ & =\sum_{A=1}^3\tau_An_A \otimes n_A \end{aligned} \end{equation} τNEQ=2∂be∂ΨNEQ⋅be=2A=1∑3∂λAe∂ΨNEQ∂be∂λAe⋅λAe2nA⊗nA=2A=1∑3∂λAe∂ΨNEQ2λAe1(nA⊗nA)⋅λAe2nA⊗nA=A=1∑3∂λAe∂ΨNEQλAenA⊗nA=A=1∑3τAnA⊗nA
- τ A \tau_A τA is the principal Kirchhoff stress :
By: (19), (20), (21)
∂ J e ∂ λ A e = ∂ ( λ 1 e λ 2 e λ 3 e ) ∂ λ A e = J e λ A e \frac{\partial J_e}{\partial \lambda_{Ae}}=\frac{\partial (\lambda_{1e}\lambda_{2e}\lambda_{3e})}{\partial \lambda_{Ae}}=\frac{J_e}{\lambda_{Ae}} ∂λAe∂Je=∂λAe∂(λ1eλ2eλ3e)=λAeJe
τ A = ∂ Ψ N E Q ∂ λ A e λ A e = ∂ ( Ψ N E Q ) D ∂ λ A e λ A e + ∂ ( Ψ N E Q ) V ∂ λ A e λ A e = ∑ B = 1 3 ∂ ( Ψ N E Q ) D ∂ b ‾ B e ∂ b ‾ B e ∂ λ A e λ A e + ∂ ( Ψ N E Q ) V ∂ J e ∂ J e ∂ λ A e λ A e = ∑ B = 1 3 ∂ ( Ψ N E Q ) D ∂ b ‾ B e ∂ b ‾ B e ∂ λ A e λ A e ⏟ d e v τ A + ∂ ( Ψ N E Q ) V ∂ J e J e ⏟ 1 3 τ N E Q : 1 \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} \tau_A &= \frac{\partial \Psi_{NEQ}}{\partial \lambda_{Ae}}\lambda_{Ae} \\ & = \frac{\partial (\Psi_{NEQ})_D}{\partial \lambda_{Ae}}\lambda_{Ae}+\frac{\partial (\Psi_{NEQ})_V}{\partial \lambda_{Ae}}\lambda_{Ae} \\ & = \sum_{B=1}^3\frac{\partial (\Psi_{NEQ})_D}{\partial \overline b_{Be}}\frac{\partial \overline b_{Be}}{\partial \lambda_{Ae}}\lambda_{Ae}+\frac{\partial (\Psi_{NEQ})_V}{\partial J_e}\frac{\partial J_e}{\partial \lambda_{Ae}}\lambda_{Ae} \\ & = \underbrace{ \sum_{B=1}^3\frac{\partial (\Psi_{NEQ})_D}{\partial \overline b_{Be}}\frac{\partial \overline b_{Be}}{\partial \lambda_{Ae}}\lambda_{Ae}}_{dev \tau_A}+\underbrace{\frac{\partial (\Psi_{NEQ})_V}{\partial J_e}J_e}_{\frac{1}{3}\tau_{NEQ}:\textbf 1} \end{aligned} \end{equation} τA=∂λAe∂ΨNEQλAe=∂λAe∂(ΨNEQ)DλAe+∂λAe∂(ΨNEQ)VλAe=B=1∑3∂bBe∂(ΨNEQ)D∂λAe∂bBeλAe+∂Je∂(ΨNEQ)V∂λAe∂JeλAe=devτA B=1∑3∂bBe∂(ΨNEQ)D∂λAe∂bBeλAe+31τNEQ:1 ∂Je∂(ΨNEQ)VJe
- Verify:
By: (22)
∂
det
A
∂
A
=
det
A
A
−
1
⇒
∂
J
e
2
∂
b
e
=
J
e
2
b
e
−
1
⇒
∂
J
e
∂
b
e
=
J
e
2
b
e
−
1
⇒
∂
J
e
−
2
/
3
∂
b
e
=
−
2
3
J
e
−
5
/
3
∂
J
e
∂
b
e
=
−
1
3
J
e
−
2
/
3
b
e
−
1
\quad \frac{\partial \det A}{\partial A} =\det AA^{-1} \\ \quad \\ \Rightarrow \quad \frac{\partial J_e^2}{\partial b_e}=J_e^2b_e^{-1} \quad \Rightarrow \quad \frac{\partial J_e}{\partial b_e}=\frac{J_e}{2}b_e^{-1} \\ \quad \\ \Rightarrow \quad \frac{\partial J_e^{-2/3}}{\partial b_e}=-\frac{2}{3}J_e^{-5/3}\frac{\partial J_e}{\partial b_e}=-\frac{1}{3}J_e^{-2/3}b_e^{-1}
∂A∂detA=detAA−1⇒∂be∂Je2=Je2be−1⇒∂be∂Je=2Jebe−1⇒∂be∂Je−2/3=−32Je−5/3∂be∂Je=−31Je−2/3be−1
∂ ( Φ A ) ∂ C = A ⊗ ∂ Φ ∂ C + Φ ∂ A ∂ C ⇒ ∂ b ‾ e ∂ b e = ∂ ( J e − 2 / 3 b e ) ∂ b e = J e − 2 / 3 ∂ b e ∂ b e + b e ⊗ ∂ J − 2 / 3 ∂ b e = J e − 2 / 3 1 4 − 1 3 J e − 2 / 3 b e ⊗ b e − 1 = J e − 2 / 3 ( 1 4 − 1 3 b e ⊗ b e − 1 ) ⇒ 2 ∂ ( Ψ N E Q ) D ∂ b e ⋅ b e = 2 ∂ ( Ψ N E Q ) D ∂ b ‾ e : ∂ b ‾ e ∂ b e ⋅ b e = 2 ∂ ( Ψ N E Q ) D ∂ b ‾ e ⋅ J e 2 / 3 b ‾ e : ( J e − 2 / 3 ( 1 4 − 1 3 b e ⊗ b e − 1 ) ) = 2 ∂ ( Ψ N E Q ) D ∂ b ‾ e ⋅ b ‾ e : ( 1 4 − 1 3 b e ⊗ b e − 1 ) = d e v [ 2 ∂ ( Ψ N E Q ) D ∂ b ‾ e ⋅ b ‾ e ] = d e v [ τ A ] \begin{aligned} &\frac{\partial (\Phi A)}{\partial C} = A\otimes \frac{\partial \Phi}{\partial C}+\Phi \frac{\partial A}{\partial C} \\ \quad \\ \Rightarrow & \quad \frac{\partial \overline b_e}{\partial b_e}=\frac{\partial (J_e^{-2/3}b_e)}{\partial b_e}=J_e^{-2/3}\frac{\partial b_e}{\partial b_e}+b_e\otimes \frac{\partial J^{-2/3}}{\partial b_e} \\ &=J_e^{-2/3}\textbf 1^4-\frac{1}{3}J_e^{-2/3}b_e\otimes b_e^{-1} \\ & = J_e^{-2/3}(\textbf 1^4-\frac{1}{3}b_e\otimes b_e^{-1}) \\ \Rightarrow & \ 2 \frac{\partial (\Psi_{NEQ})_D}{\partial b_e}\cdot b_e=2\frac{\partial (\Psi_{NEQ})_D}{\partial \overline b_e}:\frac{\partial \overline b_e}{\partial b_e}\cdot b_e \\ & = 2\frac{\partial (\Psi_{NEQ})_D}{\partial \overline b_e}\cdot J_e^{2/3}\overline b_e:(J_e^{-2/3}(\textbf 1^4-\frac{1}{3}b_e\otimes b_e^{-1})) \\ & = 2\frac{\partial (\Psi_{NEQ})_D}{\partial \overline b_e}\cdot \overline b_e:(\textbf 1^4-\frac{1}{3}b_e\otimes b_e^{-1}) \\ & = dev[2\frac{\partial (\Psi_{NEQ})_D}{\partial \overline b_e}\cdot \overline b_e] \\ &= dev[\tau_A] \end{aligned} ⇒⇒∂C∂(ΦA)=A⊗∂C∂Φ+Φ∂C∂A∂be∂be=∂be∂(Je−2/3be)=Je−2/3∂be∂be+be⊗∂be∂J−2/3=Je−2/314−31Je−2/3be⊗be−1=Je−2/3(14−31be⊗be−1) 2∂be∂(ΨNEQ)D⋅be=2∂be∂(ΨNEQ)D:∂be∂be⋅be=2∂be∂(ΨNEQ)D⋅Je2/3be:(Je−2/3(14−31be⊗be−1))=2∂be∂(ΨNEQ)D⋅be:(14−31be⊗be−1)=dev[2∂be∂(ΨNEQ)D⋅be]=dev[τA]
⇒ ∑ B = 1 3 ∂ ( Ψ N E Q ) D ∂ b ‾ B e ∂ b ‾ B e ∂ λ A e λ A e = 2 ∂ ( Ψ N E Q ) D ∂ b ‾ e ⋅ b ‾ e = d e v [ τ A ] \begin{aligned} \Rightarrow \sum_{B=1}^3\frac{\partial (\Psi_{NEQ})_D}{\partial \overline b_{Be}}\frac{\partial \overline b_{Be}}{\partial \lambda_{Ae}}\lambda_{Ae} =2\frac{\partial (\Psi_{NEQ})_D}{\partial \overline b_e}\cdot \overline b_e = dev[\tau_A] \end{aligned} ⇒B=1∑3∂bBe∂(ΨNEQ)D∂λAe∂bBeλAe=2∂be∂(ΨNEQ)D⋅be=dev[τA]
∵ τ N E Q : 1 = τ A : 1 ⇒ ∂ ( Ψ N E Q ) V ∂ J e J e = 1 3 τ N E Q : 1 \because \quad \tau_{NEQ}:\textbf 1= \tau_A : \textbf 1\\ \quad \\ \Rightarrow \frac{\partial (\Psi_{NEQ})_V}{\partial J_e}J_e = \frac{1}{3}\tau_{NEQ}:\textbf 1 ∵τNEQ:1=τA:1⇒∂Je∂(ΨNEQ)VJe=31τNEQ:1
- (11) is nonlinear equation, solved by means of Newton iteration, Local Newton Iteration
- (16) is the linearized evolution equation, is explicitly solved
Remark 4:
- Ψ N E Q \Psi_{NEQ} ΨNEQ represent strain energy in a single Maxwell element
- To model viscous of certain material it’s necessary to use several Maxwell elements parallel
- In this case, solve an evolution equation for each Maxwell element and additional contribution to non-equilibrium part of Kirchhoff stress tensor
Local Newton Iteration
- [1] Non-linear equation, from (11)
r A = ε A e + Δ t ( 1 2 η D d e v [ τ A ] + 1 9 η V τ N E Q : 1 ) − ( ε A e ) t r i a l = 0 \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} r_A = \varepsilon_{Ae} +\Delta t(\frac{1}{2\eta_D}dev[\tau_{A}]+\frac{1}{9\eta_V}\tau_{NEQ}: \textbf 1)-(\varepsilon_{Ae})_{trial}=0 \end{aligned} \end{equation} rA=εAe+Δt(2ηD1dev[τA]+9ηV1τNEQ:1)−(εAe)trial=0
- [2] Linearize around ε A e = ( ε A e ) k \varepsilon_{Ae}=(\varepsilon_{Ae})_k εAe=(εAe)k
r A ≈ r A ∣ ( ε A e ) k ⏟ ( r ~ A ) k + ∑ B = 1 3 ∂ r A ∂ ε B e ∣ ( ε A e ) k ⏟ ( K A B ) k ( Δ ε B e ) k = 0 \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} r_A \approx \underbrace {r_A|_{(\varepsilon_{Ae})_k}}_{(\tilde r_A)_k}+\sum_{B=1}^3 \underbrace{\frac{\partial r_A}{\partial \varepsilon_{Be}}|_{(\varepsilon_{Ae})_k}}_{(K_{AB})_k}(\Delta\varepsilon_{Be})_k=0 \end{aligned} \end{equation} rA≈(r~A)k rA∣(εAe)k+B=1∑3(KAB)k ∂εBe∂rA∣(εAe)k(ΔεBe)k=0
Calculation of K A B K_{AB} KAB:
K A B = ∂ r A ∂ ε B e K_{AB} = \frac{\partial r_A}{\partial \varepsilon_{Be}} KAB=∂εBe∂rA
First, principal stress (26) has to be determined:
from (23):
∂
(
Ψ
N
E
Q
)
D
∂
b
‾
B
e
=
∑
r
=
1
3
(
μ
m
)
r
2
b
‾
B
e
[
(
α
m
)
r
/
2
−
1
]
∂
(
Ψ
N
E
Q
)
V
∂
J
e
=
K
m
2
(
J
e
−
1
J
e
)
\frac{\partial (\Psi_{NEQ})_D}{\partial \overline b_{Be}}= \sum_{r = 1}^3\frac{(\mu_m)_r}{2}\overline b_{Be}^{[(\alpha_m)_r/2-1]} \\ \quad \\ \frac{\partial (\Psi_{NEQ})_V}{\partial J_e}=\frac{K_m}{2}(J_e-\frac{1}{J_e})
∂bBe∂(ΨNEQ)D=r=1∑32(μm)rbBe[(αm)r/2−1]∂Je∂(ΨNEQ)V=2Km(Je−Je1)
from (21):
∂ b ‾ B e ∂ λ A e = ∂ ( J e − 2 / 3 λ B e 2 ) ∂ λ A e = − 2 3 J e − 2 / 3 λ B e 2 λ A e ∂ b ‾ A e ∂ λ A e = ∂ ( J e − 2 / 3 λ A e 2 ) ∂ λ A e = 4 3 J e − 2 / 3 λ A e \frac{\partial \overline b_{Be}}{\partial \lambda_{Ae}}=\frac{\partial (J_e^{-2/3}\lambda_{Be}^2)}{\partial \lambda_{Ae}}=-\frac{2}{3}J_e^{-2/3}\frac{\lambda_{Be}^2}{\lambda_{Ae}} \\ \quad \\ \frac{\partial \overline b_{Ae}}{\partial \lambda_{Ae}}=\frac{\partial (J_e^{-2/3}\lambda_{Ae}^2)}{\partial \lambda_{Ae}}=\frac{4}{3}J_e^{-2/3}\lambda_{Ae} ∂λAe∂bBe=∂λAe∂(Je−2/3λBe2)=−32Je−2/3λAeλBe2∂λAe∂bAe=∂λAe∂(Je−2/3λAe2)=34Je−2/3λAe
from (26) & (21): A ≠ B , A ≠ C , B ≠ C A \neq B, A \neq C, B \neq C A=B,A=C,B=C
τ A = ∑ B = 1 3 ∂ ( Ψ N E Q ) D ∂ b ‾ B e ∂ b ‾ B e ∂ λ A e λ A e + ∂ ( Ψ N E Q ) V ∂ J e J e = ∂ ( Ψ N E Q ) D ∂ b ‾ A e ∂ b ‾ A e ∂ λ A e λ A e + ∂ ( Ψ N E Q ) D ∂ b ‾ B e ∂ b ‾ B e ∂ λ A e λ A e + ∂ ( Ψ N E Q ) D ∂ b ‾ C e ∂ b ‾ C e ∂ λ A e λ A e + ∂ ( Ψ N E Q ) V ∂ J e J e = ∑ r = 1 3 ( μ m ) r ( 2 3 b ‾ A e [ ( α m ) r / 2 ] − 1 3 b ‾ B e [ ( α m ) r / 2 ] − 1 3 b ‾ C e [ ( α m ) r / 2 ] ) ⏟ d e v [ τ A ] + K m 2 ( J e 2 − 1 ) ⏟ 1 3 τ N E Q : 1 \begin{aligned} \tau_A & = \sum_{B=1}^3\frac{\partial (\Psi_{NEQ})_D}{\partial \overline b_{Be}}\frac{\partial \overline b_{Be}}{\partial \lambda_{Ae}}\lambda_{Ae}+\frac{\partial (\Psi_{NEQ})_V}{\partial J_e}J_e \\ &=\frac{\partial (\Psi_{NEQ})_D}{\partial \overline b_{Ae}}\frac{\partial \overline b_{Ae}}{\partial \lambda_{Ae}}\lambda_{Ae}+\frac{\partial (\Psi_{NEQ})_D}{\partial \overline b_{Be}}\frac{\partial \overline b_{Be}}{\partial \lambda_{Ae}}\lambda_{Ae}+\frac{\partial (\Psi_{NEQ})_D}{\partial \overline b_{Ce}}\frac{\partial \overline b_{Ce}}{\partial \lambda_{Ae}}\lambda_{Ae}\\ &\quad \quad \quad \quad \quad +\frac{\partial (\Psi_{NEQ})_V}{\partial J_e}J_e \\ & = \underbrace{\sum_{r = 1}^3(\mu_m)_r(\frac{2}{3}\overline b_{Ae}^{[(\alpha_m)_r/2]}-\frac{1}{3}\overline b_{Be}^{[(\alpha_m)_r/2]}-\frac{1}{3}\overline b_{Ce}^{[(\alpha_m)_r/2]})}_{dev[\tau_A]}+\underbrace{\frac{K_m}{2}(J_e^2-1) }_{\frac{1}{3}\tau_{NEQ}:\textbf 1} \end{aligned} τA=B=1∑3∂bBe∂(ΨNEQ)D∂λAe∂bBeλAe+∂Je∂(ΨNEQ)VJe=∂bAe∂(ΨNEQ)D∂λAe∂bAeλAe+∂bBe∂(ΨNEQ)D∂λAe∂bBeλAe+∂bCe∂(ΨNEQ)D∂λAe∂bCeλAe+∂Je∂(ΨNEQ)VJe=dev[τA] r=1∑3(μm)r(32bAe[(αm)r/2]−31bBe[(αm)r/2]−31bCe[(αm)r/2])+31τNEQ:1 2Km(Je2−1)
By means of the relation:
from
λ
A
e
=
exp
[
ε
A
e
]
\lambda_{Ae}=\exp [\varepsilon_{Ae}]
λAe=exp[εAe]
∂ b ‾ A e ∂ ε A e = ∂ b ‾ A e ∂ λ A e ∂ λ A e ∂ ε A e = ∂ b ‾ A e ∂ λ A e λ A e = 4 3 b ‾ A e ∂ b ‾ A e ∂ ε B e = ∂ b ‾ A e ∂ λ B e ∂ λ B e ∂ ε B e = ∂ b ‾ A e ∂ λ B e λ B e = − 2 3 b ‾ A e . ( A ≠ B ) ∂ J e ∂ ε B e = ∂ J e ∂ λ B e ∂ λ B e ∂ ε B e = J e λ B e λ B e = J e \frac{\partial \overline b_{Ae}}{\partial \varepsilon_{Ae}}=\frac{\partial \overline b_{Ae}}{\partial \lambda_{Ae}}\frac{\partial \lambda_{Ae}}{\partial \varepsilon_{Ae}}=\frac{\partial \overline b_{Ae}}{\partial \lambda_{Ae}}\lambda_{Ae}=\frac{4}{3}\overline b_{Ae} \\ \quad \\ \frac{\partial \overline b_{Ae}}{\partial \varepsilon _{Be}}=\frac{\partial \overline b_{Ae}}{\partial \lambda_{Be}}\frac{\partial \lambda_{Be}}{\partial \varepsilon_{Be}}=\frac{\partial \overline b_{Ae}}{\partial \lambda_{Be}}\lambda_{Be}=-\frac{2}{3}\overline b_{Ae}. (A \neq B) \\ \quad \\ \frac{\partial J_e}{\partial \varepsilon_{Be}}=\frac{\partial J_e}{\partial \lambda_{Be}}\frac{\partial \lambda_{Be}}{\partial \varepsilon_{Be}}=\frac{J_e}{\lambda_{Be}}\lambda_{Be}=J_e ∂εAe∂bAe=∂λAe∂bAe∂εAe∂λAe=∂λAe∂bAeλAe=34bAe∂εBe∂bAe=∂λBe∂bAe∂εBe∂λBe=∂λBe∂bAeλBe=−32bAe.(A=B)∂εBe∂Je=∂λBe∂Je∂εBe∂λBe=λBeJeλBe=Je
We arrive: A ≠ B , A ≠ C , B ≠ C A \neq B, A \neq C, B \neq C A=B,A=C,B=C
∂ d e v [ τ A ] ∂ ε A e = ∑ r = 1 3 ( μ m ) r ( α m ) r ( 4 9 b ‾ A e [ ( α m ) r / 2 ] + 1 9 b ‾ B e [ ( α m ) r / 2 ] + 1 9 b ‾ C e [ ( α m ) r / 2 ] ) ∂ d e v [ τ A ] ∂ ε B e = ∑ r = 1 3 ( μ m ) r ( α m ) r ( − 2 9 b ‾ A e [ ( α m ) r / 2 ] − 2 9 b ‾ B e [ ( α m ) r / 2 ] + 1 9 b ‾ C e [ ( α m ) r / 2 ] ) ∂ ( 1 3 τ N E Q : 1 ) ∂ ε A e = K m J e 2 \begin{aligned} &\frac{\partial dev[\tau_A]}{\partial \varepsilon_{Ae}}=\sum_{r = 1}^3(\mu_m)_r(\alpha_m)_r(\frac{4}{9}\overline b_{Ae}^{[(\alpha_m)_r/2]}+ \frac{1}{9}\overline b_{Be}^{[(\alpha_m)_r/2]}+\frac{1}{9}\overline b_{Ce}^{[(\alpha_m)_r/2]}) \\ &\frac{\partial dev[\tau_A]}{\partial \varepsilon_{Be}}=\sum_{r = 1}^3(\mu_m)_r(\alpha_m)_r(-\frac{2}{9}\overline b_{Ae}^{[(\alpha_m)_r/2]}- \frac{2}{9}\overline b_{Be}^{[(\alpha_m)_r/2]}+\frac{1}{9}\overline b_{Ce}^{[(\alpha_m)_r/2]}) \\ &\frac{\partial(\frac{1}{3}\tau_{NEQ}:\textbf 1)}{\partial \varepsilon _{Ae}}=K_mJ_e^2 \end{aligned} ∂εAe∂dev[τA]=r=1∑3(μm)r(αm)r(94bAe[(αm)r/2]+91bBe[(αm)r/2]+91bCe[(αm)r/2])∂εBe∂dev[τA]=r=1∑3(μm)r(αm)r(−92bAe[(αm)r/2]−92bBe[(αm)r/2]+91bCe[(αm)r/2])∂εAe∂(31τNEQ:1)=KmJe2
Assume η D \eta_D ηD and η V \eta_V ηV to be constant
K A B = ∂ r A ∂ ε A e = δ A B + Δ t 1 η D ∂ d e v [ τ A ] ∂ ε B e − Δ t 1 3 η V K m J e 2 \begin{aligned} K_{AB} = \frac{\partial r_A}{\partial \varepsilon_{Ae}}=\delta_{AB}+\Delta t\frac{1}{\eta_D}\frac{\partial dev [\tau_A]}{\partial \varepsilon_{Be}}-\Delta t\frac{1}{3\eta_V}K_mJ_e^2 \end{aligned} KAB=∂εAe∂rA=δAB+ΔtηD1∂εBe∂dev[τA]−Δt3ηV1KmJe2
- [3] Solve for ( Δ ε B e ) k (\Delta \varepsilon_{Be})_k (ΔεBe)k:
∑ B = 1 3 ( K A B ) k ( Δ ε B e ) k = − ( r ~ A ) k \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} \sum_{B=1}^3 (K_{AB})_k(\Delta \varepsilon_{Be})_k=-(\tilde r_A)_k \end{aligned} \end{equation} B=1∑3(KAB)k(ΔεBe)k=−(r~A)k
- [4] Update:
( ε A e ) k + 1 = ( ε A e ) k + ( Δ ε A e ) k , k ← k + 1 \begin{equation} \begin{aligned} (\varepsilon_{Ae})_{k+1}=(\varepsilon_{Ae})_k+(\Delta \varepsilon_{Ae})_k, \quad k\leftarrow k+1 \end{aligned} \end{equation} (εAe)k+1=(εAe)k+(ΔεAe)k,k←k+1
- [5] Repeat until ∣ ∣ r A ∣ ∣ < t o l ||r_A||< tol ∣∣rA∣∣<tol