The Complex Field. We firstly introduce the definition of complex
numbers.
Definiton: A complex numbers is an ordered pair
(
a
,
b
)
(a,b)
(a,b) of real
numbers.
(
a
,
b
)
(a,b)
(a,b) and
(
b
,
a
)
(b,a)
(b,a) are regarded as distinct if
a
≠
b
a\ne b
a=b. Let
x
=
(
a
,
b
)
,
y
=
(
c
,
d
)
x=(a,b),y=(c,d)
x=(a,b),y=(c,d) be two complex numbers. We write
x
=
y
x=y
x=y if and only if
a
=
c
a=c
a=c and
b
=
d
b=d
b=d. We define
x
+
y
=
(
a
+
c
,
b
+
d
)
x
y
=
(
a
c
−
b
d
,
a
d
+
b
c
)
\left. \begin{aligned} x+y&=(a+c,b+d)\\ xy&=(ac-bd, ad+bc) \end{aligned} \right.
x+yxy=(a+c,b+d)=(ac−bd,ad+bc)
From the definition, we can easily prove that complex numbers is a
field, with
(
0
,
0
)
(0,0)
(0,0) and
(
1
,
0
)
(1,0)
(1,0) in the role of
0
0
0 and
1
1
1. On the other
hand, we shall also note that real numbers is a subfield of complex
field. You might have noticed that we have defined the complex numbers
without any reference to the square root of
−
1
-1
−1. It is because that
notation
(
a
,
b
)
(a,b)
(a,b) is equivalent to
a
+
b
i
a+bi
a+bi.
Definiion: i = ( 0 , 1 ) i=(0,1) i=(0,1)
According to this definition, we have i 2 = ( 0 , 1 ) ( 0 , 1 ) = ( − 1 , 0 ) = − 1 i^2=(0,1)(0,1)=(-1,0)=-1 i2=(0,1)(0,1)=(−1,0)=−1
a + b i = ( a + 0 ) + ( b , 0 ) ( 0 , 1 ) = ( a , 0 ) + ( 0 , b ) = ( a , b ) a+bi=(a+0)+(b,0)(0,1)=(a,0)+(0,b)=(a,b) a+bi=(a+0)+(b,0)(0,1)=(a,0)+(0,b)=(a,b)
Definition If
a
,
b
a,b
a,b are real and
z
=
a
+
b
i
z=a+bi
z=a+bi, then the complex number
z
ˉ
=
a
−
b
i
\bar{z}=a-bi
zˉ=a−bi is called the conjugate of
z
z
z. The numbers
a
a
a and
b
b
b
are the real part and the imaginary part of
z
z
z, respectively.
a = R e ( z ) , b = I m ( z ) . a=Re(z), b=Im(z). a=Re(z),b=Im(z).
Cauchy-Schwarz inequality: If
(
a
1
,
a
2
,
⋯
,
a
n
)
\left( a_1, a_2, \cdots, a_n \right)
(a1,a2,⋯,an)
and
(
b
1
,
b
2
,
⋯
,
b
n
)
\left( b_1, b_2, \cdots, b_n \right)
(b1,b2,⋯,bn) are complex numbers, then
∣
∑
i
=
1
n
a
i
b
i
ˉ
∣
2
⩽
∑
i
=
1
n
∣
a
i
∣
2
∑
i
=
1
n
∣
b
i
∣
2
\left|\sum_{i=1}^{n}a_i\bar{b_i}\right|^2\leqslant \sum_{i=1}^{n}|a_i|^2 \sum_{i=1}^{n}|b_i|^2
∣∣∣∣∣i=1∑naibiˉ∣∣∣∣∣2⩽i=1∑n∣ai∣2i=1∑n∣bi∣2
We omit the proof because it is not instructive. It does not give any
insight of the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. However, there must be some
reasons why Rudin did it like that, but I cannot figure it out.